Decolonizing the Internet's Structured Data - SUMMARY REPORT - Whose ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
IN OCTOBER 2021, OVER 40 PARTICIPANTS FROM AROUND THE WORLD WERE BROUGHT TOGETHER FOR A CONVERSATION ABOUT DECOLONIZING THE INTERNET’S STRUCTURED DATA, LEADING UP TO WIKIDATACON. THE EVENT WAS JOINTLY ORGANIZED BY WHOSE KNOWLEDGE?, WIKI MOVIMENTO BRASIL, AND WIKIMEDIA DEUTSCHLAND. THIS IS THE REPORT BACK FROM OUR GATHERING AND THE REFLECTIONS THAT EMERGED FROM IT. Image by Whose Knowledge?, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons Image by Whose Knowledge?, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Content Why did we organize this conversation? 4 What did we do, and how did we do it? 5 What emerged 6 Perspectives and provocations 6 Imaginations and Implementations 9 Listening and learning 10 What is next? 11 Gratitude 12
Why did we organize this the power dynamics of structured data, we can examine whose views, whose colonial languages. Yet we are the majority of the world’s population, the conversation? agenda, whose ontologies (categories of majority of those online, and the ones classification), and whose decisions build most impacted by how structured data is Structured data is at the core of how the and sustain these classifications and used, or abused. We are the internet - as we currently know it - works. systems. We can then work together to communities that are most impacted by These are pieces of information build more just and equitable systems of historical and ongoing structures of organized in such a way that they can be structured data. power and privilege and interlocking easily read, understood, and processed systems of oppression, whether it is by machines. Countless apps and This transformation of structured data colonization, patriarchy, racism, platforms are built upon such structured systems - and knowledge itself - requires homophobia, classism, casteism, data systems, including tools created by an ongoing conversation and ableism, and beyond. This is why we content providers like Google and commitment that is not limited to need to start decolonizing the internet as collaborative initiatives like Wikidata. As a technology companies or specific a practice, not simply a metaphor: we result, they permeate every corner of our sectors. It needs to be a collective effort need to transform the different forms of daily lives online, from maps and from individuals, organizations, and power and privilege that shape our navigation systems to movie reviews and communities with different forms of digital technologies. rankings. knowledge and expertise, a process we call allyship or “solidarity in action”. Most Learn more about why knowledge Through these systems, massive importantly though, this shared process justice matters for structured data from amounts of data get sorted out, needs to center the expertise, lived this presentation by our co-director organized, and classified in relation to experiences, and leadership of the Anasuya Sengupta. other pieces of data. As a result, they are minoritized majority of the world. informed and structured by and around specific regulations, traditions, and As we’ve shared before, only a fraction of What a powerful and heartfelt presentation on epistemologies. In an attempt to online public knowledge is produced on knowledge decolonization and its importance to categorize the world, they prescribe or by women, people of color, LGBTQI certain frames and worldviews — in folks, Indigenous communities, and structured data from @Anasuyashh other words, they are far from the often- peoples from the Global South, in @WhoseKnowledge at #WikidataCon2021. assumed neutrality of data. By analyzing languages that are not English or other Thank u. We are not here to fill the gaps, but 4 to restruct and rethink the ways of doing things. FLAVIA DORIA @AFLAVIADORIA ON TWITTER, 29 OCTOBER 2021
Decolonizing the Internet’s Structured Data was born out of the pressing, What did we do, and how did lay the groundwork for key areas and future concrete actions. urgent need for such a collective we do it? conversation, centering those who are We carried out the conversation virtually, often marginalized. On October 13th, and offered simultaneous interpretation Decolonizing the Internet’s Structured 2021, we invited over 40 knowledge in English, Portuguese and Spanish. We Data was organized in three different activists, community organizers, tech- wanted everyone to be able to fully panels. In Panel 1, our guest speakers builders, and other “unusual allies” to join express themselves in a language that offered Perspectives and Provocations to a safe, multilingual, collaborative space. they felt comfortable with and to share frame the overall conversations. Then, This group of thoughtful, powerful their experiences and knowledges with participants split into seven groups for thinkers and doers, was mostly female- each other regardless of language discussions named Imaginations and identifying (71%), in/from the Global barriers. Implementations. Finally, listeners South (66%), and indigenous/black/ brought back key insights in a session of people of color(s) (82%) in origin. The Listening and Learning, in which we conversation served as a pre-conference shared reflections and ideas for the next for WikidataCon 2021, and was jointly steps. It has really been an extremely organized by Whose Knowledge?, Wikimedia Deutschland, and Wiki enlightening conversation, and We started the conversation by clearly Movimento Brasil. As a result, we also laying out three core beliefs and listening to the voices from prioritized the participation of commitments: love, respect, and different academic disciplines, the communities from Latin America and solidarity. Based on this set of guiding dialogue of knowledges — which the Caribbean. principles, we wanted participants to be always enriches so much — and aware of their positionalities and not only that but also from so privileges, and to be able to be their full, multiple selves during the whole session. many countries, and with so many Our goal was to promote interactions languages. A little Babel. centered around listening and learning, MONICA CECILIA CALDERON and around respect (of each other and of CLOSING SESSION, 13 OCTOBER 2021 our time together). By engaging in meaningful conversations, we wanted to 5
Additionally, we established clear privacy an academic at the University of Toronto, categories that classify the world in a practices in order to guarantee people’s librarian, Wikidata enthusiast, and a certain way. Participants navigated the safety and wellbeing during the entire citizen of the Métis Nation from Ontario, nuances that emerge when we question call. For instance, participants could keep Canada. This initial panel grounded us in how data is classified and based on their cameras off if preferred and needed what is at stake when we talk about which epistemologies, while also to seek clear consent to publish and structured data. centering the needs and the right of attribute any identifiable quote from refusal and determination of our another participant, before sharing it on We began by situating the questions communities. How do we build social media during and after the event. and frames we would cover during the alternatives based on emancipation and event: what structured data is, and what liberation? As beautifully put by our Here is how the conversations unfolded. it means to build systems around it that panelists, this conversation needs to go center multiple epistemologies. In order beyond a nice-to-have, and be to advance in those discussions, we were recognized as an urgent matter that What emerged rooted in power analysis: questioning requires resources in order to be how the control over resources — from changed and improved. Perspectives and provocations the design of platforms to the access to content in one’s languages — plays out Here’s a sneak peek of this initial at different levels online. Questions such discussion. Answers have been edited The conversation began with a panel as “whose story?,” “who is the storyteller and condensed for the sake of clarity and named Perspectives and Provocations in and curator?,” and “whose systems of length. which we framed the urgent issues categorization?” permeated many around decolonizing structured data, interventions. As the panel progressed, and panelists explained what it meant to we engaged with the importance of them. This first part counted on the structured data and laid the ground for insights of Lydia Pintscher, who is a imagining other possibilities. product manager at Wikidata; Matariki Williams, a Māori writer, curator and In this first part of the event, panelists historian, who is currently at the Ministry challenged the alleged neutrality of of Culture and Heritage in New Zealand; structured data. We framed structured Paz Peña, an activist and feminist techie data as pieces of ideology, not as neutral based in Chile; and Stacy Allison-Cassin, 6
What does structured data mean, and why is it important What does it mean to have multiple knowledge frames, that we talk about it? multiple epistemic frames, or epistemologies at the heart of structured data? We have all of these different systems that interact, that One of the things I've just been thinking about is the way in structure our movement through a space in particular ways, which power plays a role in structured data. And as someone and sometimes that way of thinking really funnels us [...]. Each who is a user rather than a designer of structured data, of those times when we encounter one of those systems of especially as an indigenous person in a colonized country, the structuring it, there is a little piece of ideology that way that plays out in the areas in which I've worked is quite conceptualizes the world in a particular way. It is an huge. [...] We do not fit within the system, as the system has not interaction between those pieces of information or data and been designed by us. That has many implications in the way in the information system that surrounds them. [...] So, which knowledge itself has been shared, or collected, and structured data for me begins at that very fundamental place gathered, and added to over time. [...] When we talk about of how we structure the world around us, how we interact internal processes, from a Ministry perspective, it is about with different information systems. Then we come along to a making and structuring data in a way that makes our internal system like Wikidata, which I think is really wonderful in a lot work more efficient. But what does that mean for our partners? of ways, like its ability to be a collaboration between Are we then expecting them to fit within a template that communities, and to have some agency in changing some of enables our work, and are we no longer centering their those knowledge structures. aspirations on how they handle their own knowledge? [...] So, when it comes to thinking about approaching structured data Image by Whose Knowledge?, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons from and with multiple epistemologies, it happens already, and it happens naturally as an indigenous person. Image by Whose Knowledge?, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons — STACY ALLISON-CASIN 7 MATARIKI WILLIAMS —
How can we re-imagine structured data, especially from a What is one thing you would like to see done differently in feminist and anti-colonial lens? structured data today, that will help us come to that space of emancipation and liberation? The structuring of the data in these systems is a historical continuation of this white, Eurocentric, colonial, patriarchal In Wikidata, we are trying to provide structured data in a way fantasy, which assumes that the data floats. They float free that is more just, more equitable, more representative of the from their origins, they are stripped from our bodies, from our different experiences and the world that we live in. [...] We're history, and therefore they are free to navigate the world like a trying to strike a balance between providing useful and neutral currency, a universal currency. [...] I also believe that usable data that people can build applications upon, and at structured data often act as a hegemonic force, because they the same time, doing justice to people, and helping them feel literally drag ways of seeing the world, as hegemonic forces represented, and seen in that data, and having it be a do. This hegemonic force presents itself as inevitable, it seeks representation of their world. And that makes the data more to be the only way to order the world. [...] If we want to see the complex in Wikidata sometimes. We regularly get told that data structured from a feminist perspective, we have to fight our data is hard to use because of that. And if I could change for the democratization of the discussion. one thing, it would be finding ways to bridge that gap. Image by Whose Knowledge?, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons Image by Whose Knowledge?, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons — PAZ PEÑA LYDIA PINTSCHER — WATCH THE RECORDING OF THIS PANEL 8
Imaginations and See snapshots from these conversations: Implementations During this part of the event, participants split up into seven small groups that combined members of different backgrounds and expertises. Each group had a facilitator, as well as someone in charge of listening and reporting back to the larger plenary. This time, we posed questions aimed at the future: what would structured data with multiple epistemic frames and anchors look like? We asked folks to imagine an internet in 2040 that has structured data with multiple epistemic frames and anchors at its core. Groups detailed different elements related to the topic: the need to recognize that lived experiences go far beyond online (structured) data; the urgency to create, promote and expand Happy to participate in the Breakout Rooms initiatives around literacy and education of @WhoseKnowledge Decolonizing the about data and its impacts on people, Internet's Structured Data. The most and the possibilities brought up by centering marginalized communities in important outcome here is to think that the design, ownership, and leadership of seeking fairness in #KnowledgeGraphs should online platforms. not only be restricted to facts but also to data models and logical constraints. 9 HOUCEMEDDINE TURKI @CSISC1994 ON TWITTER, 13 OCTOBER 2021
Listening and Learning listeners and other participants offered these key insights: This session called Listening and Learning, followed our smaller group ACCESS AND CONTROL OF DATA AGENCY/ENGAGEMENT discussions. We invited listeners from each group to report back to the plenary ▶ Recognize that decolonizing ▶ Deny people the excuses not to and, once again, we had an amazing structured data and the systems built engage with the decolonization of group of members: Thomas Hervé Mboa upon them is a critical and urgent structured data, by creating and Nkoudou, a Cameroonian social scientist, human rights issue, not simply a nice- sharing resources and gradually biochemist and maker; Maya Indira to-have conversation on the margins. create an ecosystem where there are Ganesh, an Indian researcher and ▶ Acknowledge that marginalized no reasonable excuses not to educator on tech, especially ethical AI; communities — the minoritized acknowledge, and represent diversity Jani Pereira, a biologist based in São majority of the world — have little to of contexts and epistemologies Paulo, Brazil; Constanza Verón, a no access or control over the data that ▶ Acknowledge that Indigenous and historian and educator based in Buenos governs their lives currently. other marginalized communities Aires, who is currently at Wikimedia ▶ Share knowledge with different should have the right to refuse to have Argentina; Asaf Bartov, a Wikimedian, communities about data, technical their knowledges online, or to be structured data enthusiast, a digital tools, and how to inhabit and use datafied, and the agency over what librarian; Amanda Jurno, a Brazilian online spaces and digital tools safely information they share with the world. professor and researcher in and fully. communication studies, from Wiki ▶ Be aware that a community-centered Movimento Brasil, and Alex Hanna, a vision for structured data may be sociologist and Director of Research at irreconcilable with the agendas of the Distributed AI Research Institute. some individuals and organizations invested in structured data, especially They explained what had surprised, those using it for profit over human excited, or challenged them and what well-being. had been the most radically imaginative and interesting ideas — as well as suggestions for how to get there. Our 10
DISTRIBUTED DATA PLURALITY OF DATA What is next? ▶ Develop ways of creating smaller and ▶ Redesign systems and model them connected datasets that are governed based on different knowledges and For many participants, Decolonizing the by marginalized communities communities’ glorious complexities. Internet's Structured Data was a much- themselves, rather than by companies ▶ Recognize that most of the world’s needed opportunity to pause for a based only on profit. knowledge systems are not text-based moment and imagine radical (and might include a medium that possibilities for structured data. It also involves songs, tales, artworks of meant a chance of doing it in different kinds), and go beyond text to community and across regions and areas PLANET-CENTERED REDESIGN find different forms of encoding data. of study and of work. Moving forward, ▶ Be mindful of and incorporate in ▶ Learn from local examples and their many of them voiced their interest in discussions the environmental specificities in order to create broader organizing more collective spaces like impacts of the infrastructure needed changes, especially because “local” is this and advancing more concrete steps for the processing of massive rarely “small”, especially in the Global towards emancipatory practices. amounts of data (e.g., data centers). South. ▶ Restructure systems while constantly ▶ Commit to listening and As organizers, we recognize the enormity asking ourselves: what are they for? accommodating different of the challenge, and we knew from the What purpose do they serve? perspectives in changing the nature start that this conversation would need of structured data, knowing that to be the first of many. As we move into decolonization is a process that takes 2022, we are keen to create and convene time and constant effort from more opportunities to radically multiple people and communities. reimagine and redesign the internet’s structured data through a feminist, anti- colonial, anti-racist lens. With these next steps in mind, we are staying connected, through a mailing list, with everyone WATCH THE RECORDINGS OF THE who joined us for this first conversation. LISTENING AND LEARNING PANEL We will also keep our broader AND THE CLOSING SESSION communities informed and involved, through updates in our newsletter. 11
Gratitude Decolonizing the Internet’s Structured Data would not have been possible without everyone who joined the conversation, thank you to all our amazing panelists, listeners and participants. Thank you to our fabulous interpreters as well, without whom this would not have been a multilingual conversation. We also want to express our gratitude to our co-conspirators for this event, Amanda Jurno and Érica Azzellini from Wiki Movimento Brasil, and Sabine Müller and Dominik Scholl at Wikimedia Deutschland. Last but not least, we take this opportunity to thank our incredible supporters, partners, and allies at large, whose everyday support made this conversation happen, and will make the many more to come a reality. This report is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 12
You can also read