CY 2021 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and Quality Payment Program Final Rule - Overview December 10, 2020
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
CY 2021 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and Quality Payment Program Final Rule - Overview December 10, 2020 ©2020 All Rights Reserved
Overview Physician Fee Schedule • Evaluation and Management (E/M) services and Conversion Factor • AMGA Consulting • Documentation • Telehealth Additions Quality Payment Program • MIPS Value Pathways • APM Performance Pathway Medicare Shared Savings Program • Quality Performance Standard ©2020 All Rights Reserved 2
CY 2021 PFS and Conversion Factor • CMS finalizes conversion 2020: factor decrease of 10% $36.09 • Lower conversion factor required by budget Proposed: neutrality rules $32.26 • Significant increase in work RVUs for E/M codes Final: $32.41 ©2020 All Rights Reserved 4
Conversion Factor: 2008 – 2021 $39.00 $38.00 $37.00 $36.00 $35.00 $34.00 $33.00 $32.00 $31.00 $30.00 $29.00 2008 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 (1st (2nd (1st (2nd half) half) half) half) ©2020 All Rights Reserved 5
Estimated Impact by Specialty Allowed Work RVU PE RVU MP RVU Combined Service Charges Change Change Change Impact Endocrinology $506 11% 6% 1% 17% Family $5,982 9% 4% 1% 13% Practice Urology $1,803 4% 4% 0% 8% Oncology $1,702 9% 5% 1% 14% Internal $10,654 2% 2% 0% 4% Medicine Allowed charges in millions ©2020 All Rights Reserved 7
Estimated Impact by Specialty Allowed Work RVU PE RVU MP RVU Combined Service Charges Change Change Change Impact Orthopedic $3,792 -3% -1% 0% -5% Surgery Vascular $1,287 -2% -5% 0% -7% Surgery Anesthesiology $74 -4% -2% 0% -7% Radiology $5,253 -6% -5% 0% -11% Allowed charges in millions ©2020 All Rights Reserved 8
Revalue Services Similar to E/M • End-Stage Renal Disease Monthly Capitation Payment Services • Transitional Care Management Services • Maternity Services • Cognitive Impairment Assessment and Care Planning • Initial Preventive Physical Examination and Initial Subsequent Annual Wellness Visits • Emergency Department Visits • Therapy Evaluations • Psychiatric Diagnostic Evaluations & Psychotherapy Services ©2020 All Rights Reserved 9
Documentation • Finalized in 2020 rulemaking • CMS finalized CPT descriptors, guidelines, and payment rates effective on Jan. 1, 2021 • Significant modification to the coding, documentation, and payment of E/M services ©2020 All Rights Reserved 10
Documentation Medical Decision Making Time • Number and complexity of • Total Time on date of the problems addressed in the encounter – Reviewing tests in preparation for a encounter patient’s visit • Amount or complexity of data – Counseling or educating a patient, to be reviewed and analyzed family or caregiver – Reporting test results to a patient • Risk of complications or by phone morbidity of patient – Ordering medications, tests or management procedures – “Pajama time” ©2020 All Rights Reserved 11
Congress and E/M ©2020 All Rights Reserved 12
Legislative Action? • Congressional interest in preventing cuts – In Dec. 18th package? • Multiple approaches to address cuts • Payfors? ©2020 All Rights Reserved 13
AMGA Consulting ©2020 All Rights Reserved 14
15 Online Survey Results Question 1: Percent Overall Type If the E&M changes are enacted by CMS, how will your commercial payers respond: All Independent System Affiliated All of our commercial payers will likely follow CMS’s lead 19.3% 25.5% 14.9% Most of our commercial payers will likely follow CMS’s lead 37.8% 33.3% 40.3% Some of our commercial payers will likely follow CMS’s lead 11.8% 9.8% 13.4% Few or none of our commercial payers will likely follow CMS’s lead 0.8% 0.0% 1.5% Uncertain how commercial payers will respond 30.3% 31.4% 29.9% Question 2: Percent Overall Type How are your non-Medicare payer fee schedules constructed? All Independent System Affiliated Most built upon % of Medicare 58.8% 72.5% 49.3% Most built upon wRVU conversion factors 16.8% 7.8% 23.9% Most built on a per code rate 13.4% 7.8% 16.4% Combo of the above 10.9% 11.8% 10.4% There is uncertainty on how commercial payors will respond; however, it is expected most will follow CMS’s lead (eventually). ©2020 All Rights Reserved 15
16 Online Survey Results Continued Question 3: Percent Overall Which preparations has your organization taken regarding the potential changes in the proposed rule (choose all that apply): All None or very little action / waiting for the final rule before taking any action 6.7% We have discussed the potential changes among leadership 25.9% We have discussed the potential changes with physicians/providers 16.3% We have calculated the specialty/physician-level compensation changes anticipated 14.5% We have considered the impact on medical group reimbursement under the proposal rule 19.2% We have discussed potential changes to our physician compensation model(s) in response to the proposed rule 16.3% Other 1.2% Results suggest that many groups still have work to do to understand the operational and financial implications of these changes. ©2020 All Rights Reserved 16
17 Online Survey Results Continued Question 4: Percent Overall Several respondents Is your organization (per your employment agreements) commented that they automatically allowed to make adjustments to physician worked through their compensation to mitigate the potential impacts of work RVU or reimbursement conversion factor changes? compensation All committees to maintain Yes 38.3% No 40.8% 2020 wRVU weights and Some 20.8% conversion factors for another year. Question 4.1: Percent Overall If you answered “no” or “some” in the previous question, which of the Some smaller groups following might you consider? Check all options that apply. All use net collections Requesting physicians voluntarily renegotiate compensation formula(s) models which will not before January 1, 2021, to minimize the financial impact on the group overall be impacted the same 15.9% way. Offering a modest one-time bonus as an incentive to agree to a change in the compensation per work RVU to manage budget impact for the group 3.2% Including language in all future employment agreements that CMS work RVU weight or reimbursement conversion factor changes will trigger contract re- negotiation (or will be neutralized) 34.9% Other 46.0% ©2020 All Rights Reserved 17
18 Online Survey Results: Action Steps Immediate actions to take if you have not done so already: Analyze the financial impact of these changes on your organization Determine your best option(s) for moving forward (e.g., maintain 2020 values, etc.) Validate your best options with legal/compliance Educate leaders and physicians/providers on the changes that need to occur Manage the change management/implementation process ©2020 All Rights Reserved 18
Telehealth ©2020 All Rights Reserved 19
CARES Act and Telehealth • CMS temporarily removed the geographic and site of service originating site restrictions for Medicare telehealth services. • This rule does not address these provisions. • CMS is limited by statute and cannot permanently expand the list of telehealth providers. CMS notes that making these flexibilities permanent requires an act of Congress. ©2020 All Rights Reserved 20
Additions to Telehealth Category 1 • Group Psychotherapy (CPT 90853) • Domiciliary, Rest Home, or Custodial Care services, Established patients (CPT 99334-99335) • Home Visits, Established Patient (CPT 99347- 99348) Finalized as permanent additions as • Cognitive Assessment and Care Planning Medicare Telehealth services Services (CPT 99483) • Visit Complexity Inherent to Certain Office/Outpatient E/Ms (HCPCS G2211) • Prolonged Services (HCPCS G2212) • Psychological and Neuropsychological Testing (CPT 96121) ©2020 All Rights Reserved 21
Temporary Additions • Domiciliary, Rest Home, or Custodial Care services, Established patients (CPT 99336-99337) • Home Visits, Established Patient (CPT 99349-99350) • Emergency Department Visits, Levels 1-5 (CPT 99281-99285) • Nursing facilities discharge day management (CPT 99315-99316) • Psychological and Neuropsychological Testing ( CPT 96130- 96133; CPT 96136- 96139) • Therapy Services, Physical and Occupational Therapy, All levels (CPT 97161- 97168; CPT 97110, 97112, 97116, 97535, 97750, 97755, 97760, 97761, 92521- 92524, 92507) • Hospital discharge day management (CPT 99238- 99239) • Inpatient Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care, Subsequent (CPT 99469, 99472, 99476) • Continuing Neonatal Intensive Care Services (CPT 99478- 99480) • Critical Care Services (CPT 99291-99292) • End-Stage Renal Disease Monthly Capitation Payment codes (CPT 90952, 90953, 90956, 90959, and 90962) • Subsequent Observation and Observation Discharge Day Management (CPT 99217; CPT 99224- 99226) Bold = Not included in Proposed Rule ©2020 All Rights Reserved 22
Not Adding Permanently or Temporarily • Initial Nursing Facility Visits, All Levels (Low, Moderate, and High Complexity) (CPT 99304-99306) • Initial hospital care (CPT 99221-99223) • Radiation Treatment Management Services (CPT 77427) • Domiciliary, Rest Home, or Custodial Care services, New (CPT 99324- 99328) • Home Visits, New Patient, all levels (CPT 99341- 99345) • Inpatient Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care, Initial (CPT 99468, 99471, 99475, 99477) • Initial Neonatal Intensive Care Services (CPT 99477) • Initial Observation and Observation Discharge Day Management (CPT 99218 – 99220; CPT 99234- 99236) • Medical Nutrition Therapy (CPT G0271) ©2020 All Rights Reserved 23
Remote Physiologic Monitoring Services • Once the public health emergency ends, a care provider must have an established patient-physician relationship for Remote Physiologic Monitoring (RPM) services to be furnished. • RPM can be ordered and billed only by physicians or non-physician practitioners who are eligible to bill Medicare for E/M services. – CPT code 99091 can only be furnished by a physician or other qualified healthcare professional, CPT codes 99457 and 99458 can be furnished by a physician or other qualified healthcare professional, or by clinical staff under the general supervision of the physician. • Consent to receive RPM services may be obtained at the time that RPM services are furnished. • RPM services may be medically necessary for patients with acute conditions as well as patients with chronic conditions. • “Interactive Communication” for purposes of CPT codes 99457 and 99458 requires, at a minimum, a real-time synchronous, two-way audio interaction that is capable of being enhanced with video or other kinds of data transmission ©2020 All Rights Reserved 24
Telehealth Direct Supervision • CMS is finalizing proposal to allow direct supervision using real-time, interactive audio and video technology – Does not included audio-only – Available until the later of the end of the calendar year in which the Public Health Emergency ends or Dec. 31, 2021 ©2020 All Rights Reserved 25
Audio Only Separate Payment Final Rule • March 31 IFC established separate • After the end of the PHE, there payment for audio-only E/M services – CPT codes 99441, 99442, and 99443 will be no separate payment for the audio-only E/M visit codes. • CMS is not proposing to continue • At the end of the PHE CMS will payment beyond the PHE assign a status of “bundled” and – Cannot waive the requirement that telehealth services be furnished using post the RUC-recommended an interactive telecommunications RVUs for these codes system that includes two-way, audio/video communication technology. ©2020 All Rights Reserved 26
Quality Payment Program ©2020 All Rights Reserved 27
MIPS Value Pathways (MVPs) • CMS finalized in the CY 2020 PFS final rule the definition of MVPs at § 414.1305 as “a subset of measures and activities established through rulemaking.” • MVPs would: – Connect measures and activities across the 4 MIPS performance categories – Incorporate a set of administrative claims-based quality measures – Provide data and feedback to clinicians – Enhance information provided to patients • CMS has delayed MVPs until at least performance year 2022 due to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) PHE. Note: Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) ©2020 All Rights Reserved 28
MVP: Diabetes Example Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) QPP ©2020 All Rights Reserved 29
APM Performance Pathway • APM Performance Pathway (APP) is a new framework that CMS seeks to have align with the MVP: – Available only to participants in MIPS APMs – APP will begin in the 2021 performance year • APP would consist of six measures (3 active reporting measures, 2 claims- based measures, and CAHPS for MIPS). – For performance year 2021 only, ACOs will be able to report through the CMS web interface • The four categories in the proposed APP framework would be weighted as follows: – Quality: 50%, Promoting Interoperability: 30%, Improvement Activities: 20%, Cost: 0% ©2020 All Rights Reserved 30
APP Measure Set ©2020 All Rights Reserved 31
CY 2021 MIPS: Category Weights and Performance Threshold Promoting Improvement Quality 40% Cost 20% Interoperability Activities 15% 25% The Performance threshold: 60 points The Exceptional Performance threshold: 85 points ©2020 All Rights Reserved 32
MIPS Proposals: Quality & Cost Quality Performance Category • CMS will extend the use of the CMS Web Interface as a collection type and submission type through the 2021 performance period. The agency will sunset its use in performance year 2022. • Finalized changes to MIPS quality measures Cost Performance Category • CMS will add costs associated with telehealth services to the previously established cost measures. ©2020 All Rights Reserved 33
MIPS Proposals: IA & PI Improvement Activities Performance Category • Modify two existing Improvement Activities, remove one • Establish policies in relation to the Annual Call for Activities • Establish a process for agency-nominated improvement activities Promoting Interoperability Performance Category • The Query of Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) measure will remain an optional measure, worth 10 bonus points. • Finalized a name change for a measure (Support Electronic Referral Loops by Receiving and Reconciling Health Information) • Added new measure: Health Information Exchange (HIE) Bi-Directional Exchange ©2020 All Rights Reserved 34
MIPS APM Scoring Standard CMS will terminate Effective the APM scoring standard January 1, 2021 ©2020 All Rights Reserved 35
Methodology for MIPS Final Score: Quality Measure Benchmarks CY 2021 proposed rule • CMS may not have as representative of a sample of data as they would have had due to the national PHE for COVID-19. • CMS intends to use performance period benchmarks for the CY 2021 performance period in accordance with §414.1380(b)(1)(ii) CY 2021 final rule • CMS has determined that sufficient data were submitted for the 2019 performance period to allow them to calculate historical benchmarks for the 2021 performance period. ©2020 All Rights Reserved 36
Advanced APMs • CMS finalized a policy related to calculating Qualifying APM Participant (QP) Threshold Scores used in making QP determinations, beginning in the 2021 QP performance period. – The effect of this finalized policy would be to remove such attributed Medicare patients from the denominator of the QP Threshold Score calculations for APM Entities or individual eligible clinicians in APMs that do not allow for attribution of Medicare patients who have already been prospectively attributed to another APM Entity. – Prevent the dilution of the QP Threshold Score for the APM Entity or individual eligible clinician. ©2020 All Rights Reserved 37
Medicare Shared Savings Program ©2020 All Rights Reserved 38
APM Performance Pathway for MSSP • CMS is applying the APP to Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) accountable care organizations (ACOs) for performance year 2021. • For performance year 2021, ACOs can choose to report either the 10 measures under the CMS Web Interface or the 3 eCQM/MIPS CQM measures. ACOs will be required to field the CAHPS for MIPS survey, and CMS will calculate 2 measures using administrative claims data. • For performance year 2022 and beyond, ACOs will be required to actively report quality data on the 3 eCQM/MIPS CQM measures via the APP. In addition, ACOs will be required to field the CAHPS for MIPS survey, and CMS will calculate two measures using administrative claims data. • CMS will retain the pay-for-reporting year for new ACOs ©2020 All Rights Reserved 39
MSSP Quality Performance Standard For performance years 2021 For performance year 2023 and and 2022 subsequent performance years • ACOs achieve a quality • ACOs achieve a quality performance score that is performance score that is equivalent to or higher than equivalent to or higher than the 30th percentile across all the 40th percentile across all MIPS Quality performance MIPS Quality performance category scores category scores ©2020 All Rights Reserved 40
Quality Performance and Shared Savings/Shared Losses Quality ACO can share in savings at the maximum rate performance standard met ACOs in two-sided arrangements share in losses based on their quality performance or a fixed percentage based on their track. Quality ACOs are not eligible to share in savings performance standard not met ACO owes maximum shared losses ©2020 All Rights Reserved 41
Modifications to Quality Reporting for Performance Year 2020 CAHPS for ACOs • CMS is finalizing its proposal to waive the CAHPS for ACOs reporting requirement for performance year 2020 and to assign all ACOs automatic credit for each of the CAHPS survey measures within the patient/caregiver experience domain. ©2020 All Rights Reserved 42
Questions/Comments AMGA’s Regulatory Team Darryl Drevna, M.A. Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs ddrevna@amga.org Emma Achola Coordinator, Regulatory Affairs eachola@amga.org ©2020 All Rights Reserved 43
44 Speaker Contact Information Fred Horton is President with AMGA Consulting. Fred has over 20 years of experience working inside the healthcare industry. He brings his operational, strategic, and financial acumen to his clients in order to create effective and market-sensitive solutions to their challenges within their unique environments. fhorton@amgaconsulting.com Wayne Hartley is a Vice President with AMGA Consulting. He has worked in the healthcare industry for 20 years. His operational roles were in large, integrated delivery systems including Allina Health in Minneapolis, and HealthEast (now Fairview) in St. Paul, MN, where his responsibilities included physician practice management, clinical service line leadership, and medical group strategy. whartley@amgaconsulting.com Kelsi O’Brien is a Director with AMGA Consulting. Kelsi brings over 10 years of health care experience to the team. Ms. O’Brien received her MHSA from the University of Kansas, School of Medicine. She also holds a bachelor’s degree in Health Information Management from the University of Kansas, School of Allied Health. ©2020 All Rights Reserved 44
You can also read