Building a TD Securities Mining Conference
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Building a TD Securities Mining Conference Low-Cost Mid-Tier January 22, 2020 TSX:TGZ / OTCQX:TGCDF West African Gold Producer
Forward-Looking Statements All information included in this presentation, including any information as to the future financial or operating performance and other statements of Teranga Gold Corporation (“Teranga”) that express management’s expectations or estimates of future performance, other than statements of historical fact, constitute forward-looking information or forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws and are based on expectations, estimates and projections as of the date hereof. Forward-looking statements are included for the purpose of providing information about management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future. Wherever possible, words such as “plans”, “expects”, “scheduled”, “trends”, “indications”, “potential”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “anticipate”, “to establish”, “believe”, “intend”, “ability to”, or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might”, “will”, or are "likely" to be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of these words or other variations thereof, have been used to identify such forward-looking information. Specific forward-looking statements include, without limitation, all disclosure regarding future results of operations, economic conditions and anticipated courses of action. Although the forward-looking statements contained herein reflect management's current beliefs and reasonable assumptions based upon information available to management as of the date hereof, Teranga cannot be certain that actual results will be consistent with such forward-looking information. Such assumptions include, among others, the ability to obtain any requisite governmental approvals, the accuracy of mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates, gold price, exchange rates, fuel and energy costs, future economic conditions, anticipated future estimates of free cash flow, courses of action, the anticipated impact of combining the two assets, including anticipated synergies, and the potential for the combined Sabodala-Massawa complex to become a top tier gold asset. Teranga cautions you not to place undue reliance upon any such forward- looking statements. The economic analysis presented in the Massawa Technical Report was prepared by Barrick in respect of its feasibility study for a standalone development plan and proposed mining operation at Massawa. Readers are advised that the economic outcomes disclosed by Barrick are presented in order to provide the reader with context regarding the Massawa project as proposed to be developed by Barrick. However, readers are cautioned that as Teranga proposes to process the Massawa deposits at its existing Sabodala Project, the economic analysis presented in the Massawa Technical Report should not be considered as representing the economic outcome stemming from an integrated Sabodala-Massawa mining complex. The risks and uncertainties that may affect forward-looking statements include, among others, the inherent risks involved in exploration and development of mineral properties, including government approvals and permitting, changes in economic conditions, changes in the worldwide price of gold and other key inputs, changes in mine plans and other factors, such as project execution delays, many of which are beyond the control of Teranga. For a more comprehensive discussion of the risks faced by Teranga, and which may cause the actual financial results, performance or achievements of Teranga to be materially different from estimated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by forward-looking information or forward-looking statements, please refer to Teranga’s latest Annual Information Form filed with Canadian securities regulatory authorities at www.sedar.com or on Teranga’s website at www.terangagold.com. The risks described in the Annual Information Form (filed and viewable on www.sedar.com and on Teranga’s website at www.terangagold.com) are hereby incorporated by reference herein. Teranga disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. Nothing herein should be construed as either an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy or sell Teranga securities. This presentation is dated as of January 8, 2020. All references to Teranga include its subsidiaries unless the context requires otherwise. This presentation contains references to Teranga using the words “we”, “us”, “our” and similar words and the reader is referred to using the words “you”, “your” and similar words. 2
Historical Resource Estimate – Massawa Gold Project Massawa was discovered by Randgold Resources Limited, which merged with Barrick effective January 1, 2019. On July 23, 2019, Barrick voluntarily filed a technical report under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) on the Feasibility Study of the Massawa Gold Project, Senegal (the “Massawa Feasibility Study”). The Massawa Feasibility Study disclosed mineral resource statements as well as mineral reserve estimates as of December 31, 2018, which remain current for Barrick as of the date hereof. As the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates pre-date Teranga’s agreement to acquire Massawa, Teranga is treating them as “historical estimates” under NI 43-101, but they remain relevant as the most recent mineral resource and reserves estimates for Massawa. Further drilling and resource modelling would be required to upgrade or verify these historical estimates as current mineral resources or reserves for the combined Sabodala-Massawa Complex and accordingly, they should be relied upon only as a historical resource and reserve estimate of Barrick, which pre-dates Teranga’s agreement to acquire Massawa. A Teranga “Qualified Person” under 43-101 has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves for the combined Sabodala-Massawa Complex and Teranga is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. Third Party Information This presentation includes market and industry data which was obtained from various publicly available sources and other sources believed by Teranga to be true. Although Teranga believes this information to be reliable, Teranga has not independently verified any of the data from third-party sources referred to in this presentation, or analyzed or verified the underlying reports relied upon or referred to by such sources, or ascertained the underlying assumptions relied upon by such sources. Teranga does not make any representation as to the accuracy of such information. Other Notes & Disclaimers ALL DOLLAR AMOUNTS ARE DENOMINATED IN U.S. DOLLARS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. 3
Creating a Low-Cost Mid-Tier Gold Producer Mining-Friendly West Africa Wahgnion Gold Mine(6) Standalone Stage Achieved commercial Sabodala Gold Mine(1) production November 1, 2019 Stage 2019 Production† Production 47,492 oz Au(7) Senegal 2019 Production Niger 2019 AISC/oz* Guidance 241,276 oz Au(2) $750-$825/oz Au 2019 AISC/oz* Guidance Mali $825-$900/oz Au Burkina Faso 2P Reserves 1.6Moz @ 1.61 g/t Au(8) 2P Reserves 2.4Moz @ 1.35 g/t Au(3) Guinea Golden Hill Project Standalone Stage Benin Massawa Project(4) Sierra Leone Ghana Togo Exploration/PFS Stage Indicated Resource Development Côte d’Ivoire 415koz @ 2.02 g/t Au(9) Liberia Inferred Resource Years 1-10 Average Production 203koz Au/year 644koz @ 1.68 g/t Au(9) Historical 2P Reserves 2.6Moz @ 3.94 g/t Au(5) West African Birimian Greenstone Belt Miminvest & Afema Stage Refer to Endnotes (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) in the Appendix. *Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix. Early Exploration †Life of mine initial 5-year average of 132koz Au per year. 4
Strong Organic Growth Pipeline Anticipated to transform Teranga Moving to into a low-cost, mid-tier gold producer Feasibility Pro Forma Increasing Sabodala- Production, Massawa Complex Wahgnion Gold Mine Golden Hill Project Miminvest & Afema JVs Exploration & Resource EBITDA*, Senegal Burkina Faso Burkina Faso Côte d’Ivoire Conversion Earnings & Cash Flow *Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix. 55
Sabodala: Largest Gold Producer in Senegal Diadiako Gora 2.4Moz 4.1Moz 13-Year 2P Reserves M&I Resources Mine Life(1) at 1.35 g/t Au(3) at 1.56 g/t Au(3) Sabodala Masato Mamasato Soukhoto Niakafiri Strong 5-Year Profile with Potential to Increase Mine Life Niakafiri East Kouroundi West Golouma Life of Mine Summary(10) 5 Years Maki North Kerekounda Kourouloulou 2018-2022 Medina Golouma West Golouma South Kobokoto Koulouqwinde Annual production(11) 213koz Goumbati West Koutoniokollo All-in sustaining costs* $885/oz Kinemba East Total free cash flow*(12) $230M Another Strong Year in 2019 Sabodala Gold Mine (Open Pit) 2019 Guidance Actual Senegal, West Africa Permitted mining license: 291 km2 Production 215-230koz(2) 241koz(2) *Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix Refer to Endnotes (1),(2),(3),(10),(11) and (12) in the Appendix 8
+2.0Moz of Gold Produced at Sabodala Since IPO in December 2010 Exceeded the Higher End of 2019 Production Guidance On Track To Meet Lower End of Cost Per Ounce Guidance (Koz Au) Nine months ended 2019 September 30 Consolidated Guidance $/oz Au sold 2018 2019 (Except for Cash Costs) Cost of sales $928 $993 $1,050 - $1,125 241 Total cash costs* (Sabodala only) $650 $677 $725 - $775 233 245 214 207 212 217 182 All-in sustaining costs* $972 $991 $1,000 - $1,100 131 Cash/(non-cash) inventory movements ($52) ($87) ($100) 17 and amortized advanced royalty costs (2) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 All-in sustaining costs (excluding cash/(non-cash) inventory movements $920 $904 $900- $1,000 and amortized advanced royalty costs)* *Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix 9 Refer to Endnote (2) in the Appendix
Senegal Transformational Acquisition: High-Grade Massawa Project Map View Mali One of the highest-grade undeveloped open-pit gold projects in Africa(13) Sabodala +4Mtpa Significant opportunity for operating & capital synergies and value creation(14) CIL Plant 30km FROM THE PLANT Sabodala-Massawa Complex anticipated to create a top tier gold asset Bambaraya Delya Pro forma Teranga to transform into a low-cost, mid-tier gold producer Massawa Gold Project Tina Sofia Massawa Tablo and Barrick supportive of the transaction through equity investments (CZ & NZ) Current TGZ P/NAV of ~0.6x compared to select African peers at ~0.9x(15) Senegal, West Africa Sabodala Mine (920km2) & Massawa Project (~600km2) Map not drawn to scale. 11 Refer to Endnotes (13), (14) and (15) in the Appendix.
Compelling Acquisition Rationale Massawa project hosts one of Africa’s highest-grade undeveloped open-pit gold projects(13) Total historical mineral reserves of 2.6Moz @ 3.94 g/t Au(5) High-Grade Robust economics on a standalone basis as per Barrick’s July 2019 Massawa Feasibility Study Massawa Project After-tax NPV5% of $677 million and IRR of 41% (at $1,400/oz gold price; $1,200/oz pit shell)(4) Exploration opportunity on large prospective land package Proximity of Massawa project to Sabodala‘s mill and infrastructure (within 30 km) provides opportunity for capex/opex synergies(14) – Reduces phase 1 and phase 2 capex for standalone mill and infrastructure Synergies & – Minimal infrastructure development anticipated to initiate mining at Massawa project and process free-milling ore at Sabodala Value Creation Targeting near-term higher production and lower costs at pro forma Sabodala-Massawa complex with an optimized mine schedule to be defined in technical studies Priority mining of higher-grade ore from Massawa project with first gold production targeted for H2 2020 Building the Newest Pro forma Teranga anticipated to transition to a low-cost, mid-tier gold producer – as a result, cash margins and free cash Low-Cost, Mid-Tier flows* are expected to increase commensurate with the increased production Gold Producer Teranga will continue to progress its attractive organic pipeline, including Golden Hill – an advanced exploration project Accelerates Teranga’s repositioning as a low-cost mid-tier West African gold producer Teranga Re-Rate The Massawa project’s historical mineral reserves base of 2.6Moz from 20.9Mt at 3.94 g/t (5) is expected to augment Sabodala’s current mineral reserves base of 2.4Moz from 55.7Mt at 1.35 g/t (3) Opportunity Current TGZ P/NAV of ~0.6x compared to select African peers at ~0.9x(15) *Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix. Refer to Endnotes (3), (4), (5), (13), (14) and (15) in the Appendix. 12
Transaction Summary Teranga has entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which it will acquire a 90% interest in the Massawa Gold Project from a wholly-owned subsidiary of Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick”) and Compagnie Sénégalaise de Transaction Transports Transatlantiques Afrique de l’Ouest SA (“CSTTAO”) (collectively, the “ Vendors”) Upfront consideration of $380 million in the form of $300 million in cash and $80 million in common shares ‒ $225 million will be funded by existing lender Taurus Funds Management, including $25 million to be provided by Barrick Consideration ‒ Balance to be funded through a private placement to the Vendors and a public offering Additional gold price-linked contingent payments of either nil, $25 million, $35 million, or $50 million due the later of the three years following completion of Transaction or January 31, 2023(16) Closing is subject to receipt of the Massawa exploitation license, residual exploration license, and other consents from the Government of Senegal including Teranga’s integration plans for the Sabodala-Massawa Complex Conditions Transaction is also conditional upon the closing of Teranga’s concurrent debt financing, prospectus financing and private placement financing, each of which are also inter-conditional No shareholder vote required Transaction announced on December 10, 2019 Timeline Bought deal equity offering closed on December 18, 2019 Transaction expected to close in Q1 2020 Tablo, controlled by Teranga director David Mimran, expected to invest $45 million to retain 21.2% ownership on a pro forma basis Other Terms Barrick expected to hold a 11.45% ownership in Teranga (pro forma basis) and is entitled to nominate one member to the Company’s board of directors so long as it retains 10% equity ownership 13 Refer to Endnote (16) in the Appendix.
Massawa: One of the Highest-Grade Undeveloped Open-Pit Gold Projects in Africa Reserve Grade vs. Contained Gold (Open Pit, >1.5 Moz Au Reserve and 100% Basis) Reserve Grade (g/t Au) 10.0 Massawa project grade 3.94 2.6x 3.5x 9.0 Ahafo 8.0 1.51 Reserve Contained Metal (Moz Au) 1.11 Tasiast 7.0 6.0 Massawa Producing Development Tarkwa Median Median 5.0 4.0 Essakane Sadiola Hill Fekola 3.0 Ity Block 14 Loulo-Gounkoto Siguiri Hounde 2.0 Sabodala Lefa Akyem Bissa Damang Massawa Project Bouly Navachab Bombore Iduapriem Yaoure Mana 1.0 Wahgnion 0.0 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Reserve Grade (g/t Au) Producing Asset Development Asset Teranga Asset 14 Source: Publically filed information by each Company. Note: Reserves shown exclusive of any underground deposits.
Robust Standalone Massawa Project Economics(4) Pit Shell Gold Standalone Net Present Value (5%) Gold Price Sensitivity (100% basis)(4) Price $1,200/oz Pit Shell Gold Price ($M) $1,200/oz $805 After-Tax NPV5% $M 421 Economics(4) $677 After-Tax IRR % 28 $550 Total Ore Mined Mt 21 $421 Average Grade g/t Au 3.94* Contained Gold Moz 2.6 Operational Total Tonnes Mined Mt 166 Summary(4) Average Strip Ratio w:o 6.9 $1,200/oz $1,300/oz $1,400/oz $1,500/oz Average Production Koz 201 Total Production Moz 2.1 Mine Life Years 10+ Standalone Life of Mine Production(100% basis)(4) Mining Cost $/t mined 3.55 300 $1,200/oz Pit Shell Gold Price Cost Haulage Cost $/t milled 1.25 250 Summary(4) 245 237 245 Plant Cost $/t milled 18.02 200 221 227 201 206 G&A Cost $/t milled 8.60 175 150 162 Construction incl. of BIOX $M 413 100 115 Capex BIOX Capital $M 80 Summary(4) Sustaining $M 16 50 Rehabilitation Cost $M 23 25 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 *Ore reserve grade 15 Refer to Endnote (4) in the Appendix.
Anticipated Operating & Capital Synergies Support Teranga as Natural Acquirer of Massawa Standalone Standalone Anticipated Massawa Operation(4) Sabodala Operation Synergies and Opportunities(14) (July 2019 Massawa Feasibility Study) (Year-to-date as at September 30, 2019*) (relative to July 2019 Massawa Feasibility Study) Infrastructure $333 million for all +4Mtpa mill & TSF Reduces phase 1 and phase 2 Capex phase 1 and phase 2 infrastructure within ~30 km from Massawa capex for standalone mill and infrastructure $3.55/t mined (contractor; LOM) Mining $2.86/t mined* Lower mine opex + $1.25/t ore haul to standalone mill Processing $18.02/t milled (LOM), including BIOX $11.39/t milled* Lower processing opex G&A $8.60/t milled or ~$17 million/year $4.71/t milled* Lower G&A opex Accelerated production with higher Timing 2-year build; 10+ year mine life 13-year mine life grade and longer mine life *Year-to-date as at September 30, 2019. Refer to Endnotes (4) and (14) in the Appendix. 16
Optimizing Mill Feed for Grade, Recovery & Cash Flow 2P Reserve Grade Indicative Sabodala-Massawa Processed Ore Profile* (g/t Au) (Mtpa) 4.5 3.94(5) 4 3.5 3 2.5 1.35(3) +4Mtpa Sabodala Current Mill Capacity 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Sabodala Massawa Sabodala Ore 2P Reserves Contained Metal (Moz Au) 2.65 2.6(5) 2.6 2.55 2.4(3) 2.5 2.45 Massawa Project Ore 2.4 2.35 2.3 Prioritize high-grade ore Sabodala Massawa for maximum free cash flow** Annual Production (koz Au) 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E 2025E 241(2) 203(4) Intend to complete a pre-feasibility study to develop an optimized, integrated mine plan within six months of transaction closing followed by a definitive feasibility study Sabodala 2019 Massawa LOM Average 17 *Refer to Endnotes (2), (3), (4) and (5) in the Appendix. Subject to integrated technical studies. **Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix. (First 10 Years)
Majority of Reserves are Free-Milling; BIOX a Proven Method for Refractory Ore Massawa Feasibility Study July 2019: ~80% of Massawa Project Ore Processed Through Whole Ore Leach Plant and ~20% Through BIOX(5) Central Zone, North Zone and Delya contain refractory ore Massawa Feasibility Study envisioned BIOX addition to CIL plant later in the mine life with $80 million capital cost(4) Teranga will evaluate opportunities to combine CIL/BIOX and optimize blend and recovery Well-Established Method for Processing Refractory Ore BIOX (biological oxidation) uses bacteria to oxidize sulphides in large agitated tanks before treatment in a conventional plant Applied at 18 mine-sites worldwide since 1986 – Fosterville Mine has one of the world's leading BIOX systems and has achieved record recoveries (~98% recovery as at YTD Q3 2019) Testing, studies, and experts support BIOX at the Massawa project(4) 18 SOURCE: OUTOTEC.COM Refer to Endnote (4) in the Appendix
Strong Exploration Upside Potential Mali Sabodala Gold Mine & Massawa Project Two Extensive Regional Shear Zone Structures Senegal, West Africa Both Sabodala (920 km2) and Massawa (~600 km2) properties are underlain by two extensive regional shear zone structures which Sabodala host the majority of current resources and exploration prospects +4Mtpa CIL Plant Between these two regional shear systems there exists an internal 30km structural corridor of oblique and inter-active secondary structures FROM THE PLANT known to host gold mineralization Bambaraya Potential Exploration Upside Delya Massawa Gold Tina Considerable additional exploration upside remains at both free- Sofia Project milling and refractory ore bodies to expand the resource base in Massawa advance of an integrated feasibility study (CZ & NZ) New discovery opportunities exist as exploration expands along the regional shears and within the internal structural corridor Teranga will embark on a drill program to expand the Massawa project resource base in advance of a definitive feasibility study, which is expected to be completed in 2021 Sabodala-Sofia Shear Zone Main Transcurrent Map not drawn to scale. 19 Shear Zone
Fully Funded Acquisition $225 million acquisition facility amortizing over 3-year period ending Dec 31, 2022, including $25 million to be provided by Barrick as a part of the lending syndicate Source of Funds ($M) Taurus 2.75% upfront fee and 7.85% annual interest paid quarterly in arrears Taurus 3-Year Acquisition Facility $225 Debt Other terms: (i) 100% offtake rights on Massawa project production (subject to buyback right); (ii) 4 million Teranga call rights* New Equity A total of $231 million in new equity (broker and private placement) Tablo Equity $45 – $75 million in cash to be paid as part of the Massawa acquisition Equity Barrick Equity $80 – $80 million in Teranga common shares to the Vendors Financing – $76 million to be retained for deal costs, reserve development, exploration of Teranga’s Public Equity $106 existing portfolio and working capital purposes Total Sources of Funds $456 Through the equity financing, $45 million invested by Tablo (Teranga's largest shareholder) Tablo Tablo will retain 21.2% ownership on a pro forma basis Use of Funds ($M) Equity Massawa Transaction $380 Vendors to receive $80 million in Teranga common shares through the equity financing Teranga Corporate $76 Vendors Equity On a pro forma basis, Barrick will hold 11.45% of Teranga and CSTTAO will own 0.9% & Contingent Total Use of Funds $456 Barrick to nominate one Board member so long as it retains a 10% equity ownership Consideration Gold price-linked contingent payments due the later of the three years following completion Completion of the acquisition facility, equity offering, and private placement are all inter-conditional upon completion of the transaction. of Transaction and January 31, 2023(16) *Strike price equal to 120% of the 5-day volume weighted average price of Teranga on the date of the announcement of the Transaction. 20 Refer to Endnote (16) in the Appendix
Relative Positioning Offers Opportunity for Potential Teranga Multiple Re-Rating Price/Consensus Net Asset Value* (as of December 6, 2019) Price/Consensus 2020E CFPS* (as of December 6, 2019) 1.26x 6.2x 1.19x 6.1x 5.8x 1.00x 0.96x 4.6x 4.4x 0.83x 0.72x 0.69x 3.6x 3.6x 0.66x 0.60x 3.0x 2.8x 2.7x 0.49x B2Gold Centamin Perseus Endeavour Golden Resolute Roxgold Semafo Teranga Asanko Centamin Perseus B2Gold Endeavour Golden Resolute Asanko Roxgold Semafo Teranga Star Star Status quo with multiples anticipated to be lower after factoring in acquisition and further re-rate with synergies & value creating opportunities Source: Company materials, Capital IQ, equity research. 21 *Based on consensus equity research estimates. As at December 6, 2019
Targeting Increased Reserves, Grade, Production & Cash Margin 1,600 2020E Production (koz Au) Based on consensus equity research estimates, except for Massawa. Reserve Grade (g/t Au) 1,400 1,200 8.24 1,020 3.94(5) 1,000 800 751 3.36 2.86 600 511 492 424 334* 315 1.70 1.57 1.50 1.47 400 1.44 1.32 228 203(4) 1.16 200 134 119 0 B2Gold Endeavour Centamin Resolute Semafo Teranga Perseus Golden Star Massawa Roxgold Asanko Roxgold Massawa SEMAFO Golden Star Endeavour Asanko Resolute Perseus Teranga B2Gold Centamin Life of Mine Project Average Years 1-10 2020E AISC ($/oz Au) Based on consensus equity research estimates. Reserves - Contained Metal (Moz Au, 100% Basis) $981 $949 $943* 8.7 $916 $871 7.3 6.7 6.4 $821 $800 $789 $779 $702 4.0 3.3 2.9 2.6(5) 2.6** 1.8 0.7 Perseus Asanko Teranga Resolute Centamin Golden Star Semafo Endeavour B2Gold Roxgold Endeavour Centamin Resolute B2Gold Teranga Perseus SEMAFO Massawa Asanko Golden Star Roxgold Project *Not to be interpreted as Teranga’s production and cost guidance for 2020. **Net of 50% JV with Gold Fields. Refer to Endnotes (4) and (5) in the Appendix. 22 Source: Company materials, Capital IQ, equity research.
Teranga’s Pro Forma Corporate Structure Pro Forma Ownership in Teranga As at Transaction Post Transaction Capital Structure (millions) Pro Forma January 17, 2020 Adjustment Basic shares outstanding 107.6 59.8 167.4 CSTTAO Barrick Gold Teranga share price C$7.17 C$7.17 1% 11% Basic market capitalization* $591.4 $920 Retail & As at Transaction Tablo Cash & Debt (millions) September 30, 2019 Adjustment Pro Forma Corporation 21% 167.4M Institutional Shares Shareholders Cash & cash equivalents $28 $76** $104 67% Cash from in-the-money securities* $26 $26 Total debt drawn $189 $225 $414*** *The Company used the January 17, 2020 closing share price of C$7.17 and US$/CDN exchange rate of 1.3041. **Before transaction related costs, and excludes any other changes in cash occurring between October 1, 2019 – December 9, 2019. 23 ***Excludes any changes in debt balances occurring between October 1, 2019 – December 9, 2019.
Wahgnion Burkina Faso, West Africa 24
Wahgnion: Teranga's Recently Commissioned Gold Mine 1.6Moz 2.4Moz Commercial Production Achieved November 1, 2019 13-Year 2P Reserves M&I Resources Mine Life(6) at 1.62 g/t Au(8) at 1.51 g/t Au(8) +5M hours worked without a lost time injury Strong 5-Year Profile with Potential to Increase Mine Life Completed two months ahead of the original schedule Completed approximately $15M below budget Life of Mine Summary(10) Initial 5 Years 2020-2024 First gold pour achieved in August 2019 Annual production(17) 132koz Mill operating above nameplate capacity All-in sustaining costs* $761/oz Continued focus on social responsibility activities, such as housing and livelihood restoration programs Total free cash flow* $311M Raul Exceeded the Upper End of Production Guidance 2019 Guidance Actual Production 30-40koz 47koz(7) *Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix **Pre-production capital costs of $240 million excludes $16 million in construction readiness activities spent prior to major construction Refer to Endnotes (6), (7), (8), (10) and (17) in the Appendix 25
Exploration Upside Potential Kondandougoug Multi-Year Drilling Program to Commence in 2020-2021 Wahgnion Gold Mine (Open-pit) Burkina Faso, West Africa • ~12 regional drill-ready targets with the potential to become Permitted mining license: 89 km2 resources and within trucking distance of mill Mali Bagu Sud Samavogo North • Konatvogo: 2,000-metre NW-trending anomaly between Korindougou Fourkoura and Nogbele deposits. Up to 21.6 g/t Au from altered shear-hosted quartz vein outcrops Samavogo • Bassongoro: 1,500-metre NNE-trending soil and auger anomaly (up to 15g/t Au). Intersection of regional Nianka and Kafina West Bazogo Fourkoura structures undrilled Ouahiri Bassongoro Raul Nogbele Côte d’Ivoire Raul Hillside Konatvogo Stinger Fourkoura Petit Colline Muddhi Sud Plant Reserve Deposits Exploration Targets 26
Golden Hill Burkina Faso, West Africa 27
Houndé Belt Yaramoko Early-Stage Initial Resource Provides Solid Burkina Faso, West Africa M&I: 1.3Moz ² Base From Which to Grow Golden Hill Mana & Siou M&I: 4.2Moz ¹ Houndé M&I: 3.1 Moz ³ 415,000 oz 644,000 oz ACC Holdings at 2.02 g/t(9) at 1.68 g/t(9) Teranga’s Golden Hill Project Permits Indicated Inferred Mineral Resource: (9) Teranga/ACC Indicated: 415koz @ 2.02 g/t Au Holdings JV Inferred: 644koz @ 1.68 g/t Au (Dossi Permit) Highlights of Initial Resource Interpreted Geology Acacia JVs Andesite • Excellent along trend and to-depth continuity of gold Basalt mineralization at all prospects drilled Basin Batholith • Reaffirms interpretations that each prospect offers Chert ThreeBee Karankasso JV substantial upside for size expansion Granitoid M&I: 0.7Moz ⁵ Project M&I: 0.3Moz 6 Tarkwaian Sources ¹ Press Release, SEMAFO (March 5, 2019) South Houndé JV ² Press Release, Roxgold (July 11, 2019) Inferred: 2.1Moz ⁴ ³ Annual Information Form, Endeavour Mining (March 26, 2019) ⁴ Press Release, Sarama Resources (September 4, 2019) ⁵ MD&A, Sarama Resources (August 27, 2019) For full details on Golden Hill, please visit www.terangagold.com 6 MD&A, Sarama Resources (August 27, 2019) 28 Refer to Endnote (9) in the Appendix M&I Resources are inclusive of P&P Reserves
Progressing Towards Feasibility Stage of Development Ma Far North Ma North Ma Main Ma Jonction Rapidly Advancing Project Golden Hill Ma East (Burkina Faso, West Africa) Sebe Ma South • Well advanced on the metallurgical test work Exploration licenses:468 km2 • Initial environmental and social studies have started and Gogoba North MAIN SHEAR ZONE engineering has commenced to support a mine license Nahiri Plateau application in 2020 Nahiri 27,000-Metre Drilling & Exploration Program H2 2019 Gogoba West • 11 separate drill targets identified for inclusion in drilling Geology Jackhammer Hill Offset evaluation program, including five with no previous drilling Tarkwaian Type Sediments Nahiri South • Additional 15,000 metres of auger drilling and 10,000 Volcano Sediments Jackhammer Hill Mixed Volcano Sediments & Volcanics metres of excavator trenching Basalt Peksou North • Focused on identifying additional structural trends that Grantoid Copper Batholith could add resources C-Zone Peksou • Budget of ~$5 million for H2 2019 A-Zone B-Zone Intie • Results expected to be released in Q1 2020 Included in mineral resource estimate 29
Miminvest & Afema Exploration Opportunities Côte d’Ivoire, West Africa 30
Côte d’Ivoire: Future Value Resides with Miminvest and Afema Early-Stage Opportunities 3 4 Mali Other 10% Sissingué Tongon Guinea 4% Miminvest Permits Afema Permits 11% Dianra Miminvest Exploration Properties Côte (100% earning, 3% NSR; JV formed June 2016) Ghana 19% d'Ivoire Côte d’Ivoire 35% • Guitry complex (includes Sangaredougou): Burkina Faso Highly prospective and potential district 21% Yaouré Ity • Dianra: Initial phase of exploration outlines Bonikro favourable follow-up targets Côte d’Ivoire represents more than one-third of the West African Agbaou Afema Afema Mine Joint Venture Birimian Greenstone Belt Guitry Sangaredougou (51%, earning 70%; JV formed December 2017) • Two well mineralized greenstone belts underlie mine license and regional land package Operating Gold Mine/ Development Project • Five major shear structures crossing the regional land package with a combined strike length exceeding 140 km 31
Encouraging Early-Stage Results on Miminvest Permits Sissingué Tongon High Priority Guitry District (including Sangaredougou) • First-ever drilling program at Guitry consisted of a 68-hole, 3,320 metre air-core drilling program Dianra • This program included a series of shallow, widely spaced, multi-hole drill profiles designed to evaluate the central 1,000-metre strike extent within an extensive gold-in-soil Côte d’Ivoire geochemical anomaly covering a 3 x 7 km area • The most favourable results were: Yaouré – 24 metres grading 2.02 g/t Au (GUAC008) Ity – 20 metres grading 6.37 g/t Au (GUAC018) Bonikro – 4 metres grading 5.80 g/t Au (GUAC015) – an additional +10 holes intersected 1.0-1.5 g/t over Agbaou lengths up to 10 metres Afema Sangaredougou Guitry Operating Gold Mine/Development Project 32
Numerous Structures Identified by Airborne Geophysical Survey of Afema Sefwi-Bibiani Ahafo Gold Belt Asankrangwa 17 Moz Ashanti Newmont Gold Belt Gold Belt Kumasi • Completed high-definition Konogo Esaase 1.4 Moz airborne magnetic and Côte d’Ivoire Ghana Bibiani 5.19 Moz Signature Metals radiometric survey of both the 7 Moz Obotan Resolute 5.5 Moz Akyem mine license and regional permits Asanko Newmont 3 Afema Chirano Obuasi 41 Moz • High quality survey data outlines Exploration 5 Moz Anglo Gold Ashanti numerous fault zones, cross- Kinross Permits structures, lithologic contacts and Edikan Kubi 0.9 Moz 6.6 Moz Asaute Gold Corporation areas of folded stratigraphy on Perseus mince license Bogoso/Prestea • Compelling imagery worthy of 18 Moz Winneba-Kibi Golden Star Damang 7.1 Moz extensive follow-up Goldfields Gold Belt Afema • Situated on two shear zones Tarkwa 24 Moz Mining Permit extending down from Ghana Iduapriem 8.2 Moz AngloGold Ashanti Cape Coast 33 Afema Geophysical Survey: Reduced-to-Pole Magnetic Intensity
Appendix 1
Executive Team Richard Young, CPA Paul Chawrun, P.Eng, MBA Navin Dyal, CPA David Savarie, LL.B Chantal Da Silva, J.D., LL.L., BA Gwennael Guillen President & CEO Chief Operating Officer SVP & Chief Financial Officer SVP, General Counsel, VP, Legal Affairs VP, Corporate Social Responsibility 25+ years’ experience in gold 25+ years’ experience in mining 13 years’ experience in mining including Corporate Affairs & People 15 years’ experience as a solicitor and 25 years’ experience in health, mining including 13 years at Barrick including operations and 7 years at Barrick Gold as Head of 11 years’ corporate counsel experience corporate counsel advising on global safety, environment and community Gold including finance and development projects for Fording Finance in copper business unit in mining including Deputy General finance transactions, M&A and relations, including 12 years on corporate development Coal, Suncor, and Detour Gold Counsel and Corporate Secretary of commercial matters in natural mining projects in South America and Gabriel Resources resources and financial services West Africa Nancy Lee, MA David Mallo, B.Sc. Geology Trish Moran, BBM , PPA Leily Omoumi, MBA Aziz Sy, P.Eng, M.Sc., MBA VP, Human Resources VP, Exploration VP, Investor Relations & VP, Corporate Development Regional Manager, West Africa 20 years’ experience in human 35+ years’ mineral exploration in project Corporate Communications 15+ years’ experience in the mining 17+ years’ experience in managing resources with a focus on talent evaluation and program management, 25+ years’ experience in investor and financial services industries, gold exploration projects, including development across industries in playing an integral role in acquisition, relations and communications, including including buy-side and sell-side his work as Vice President Senegal Canada, US and Asia, including discovery, and exploration of world-class the mining and financial services analyst at two major Canadian banks Operations for the Oromin Joint Director, Global Talent deposits including Eskay Creek and industries and at Hatch in a technical capacity Venture Group until its acquisition in 35 Management at Manulife Financial Cobre Panama 2014 by Teranga Gold
Teranga Board of Directors Alan Hill, M.Eng Richard Young, CPA William Biggar, MA, CPA Jendayi Frazer, Ph.D. Edward Goldenberg, MA, BCl Chairman President & CEO Director Director Director 35+ years experience in 25+ years experience in gold 25+ years experience in senior 17 years experience in key roles Distinguished career in policy including mining including 20 years at mining including 13 years at executive positions in investment, supporting initiatives and policies 10 years as Senior Policy Advisor to the Barrick Gold in project Barrick Gold in finance and mining and real estate including to build Africa’s equity and commodity Prime Minister of Canada and the Prime evaluation and development corporate development Barrick Gold and Merrill Lynch markets. First woman U.S. Ambassador Minister's Chief of Staff in 2003. Honourary to South Africa Doctorate of Laws from McGill University Christopher Lattanzi, B.Eng David Mimran Alan Thomas, CPA Frank Wheatley, LL.B Pending close of Director Director & Teranga’s Largest Shareholder Director Director Massawa acquisition 30 years experience in mining CEO of Grands Moulins d’Abidjan and 30+ years mining and energy 30+ years mining industry experience as and Barrick’s retained property valuation, scoping, feasibility Grands Moulins de Dakar, among the industry experience in senior director, senior officer and legal counsel. ownership studies and project monitoring on a largest producers of agri-food in West financial and director roles including Extensive experience in public financing, global basis. Founder of Micon Africa. Special Advisor to the Government 6 years as VP and CFO of ShawCor project debt financing, permitting of large- 36 International of the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire and 11 years as CFO of Noranda scale mining projects and strategic M&A
2019 Guidance (Year Ending December 31, 2019) Sabodala Wahgnion Consolidated(24) Total mined (‘000t) 37,000 – 39,500 8,000 – 10,000(22) - Ore Mined (‘000t) 3,000 – 3,500 1,000 – 1,200(22) - Grade mined (g/t) 1.50 – 2.00 1.80 – 2.00 - Strip ratio waste/ore 9.5 – 12.0 - - Ore milled (‘000t) 4,100 – 4,300 500 – 650 - Head grade (g/t) 1.80 – 2.00 1.80 – 2.00 - Recovery rate % 89.0 – 91.0 ~90.0 - Announced 2019 Gold produced(18) (oz) 215,000 – 230,000 30,000 – 40,000 245,000 – 270,000 consolidated production of Operating Cost of sales per ounce sold $/oz sold 1,050 – 1,125 1,175 – 1,250(23) 1,050 – 1,125(23) 289koz on January 7, 2019 Results Total cash costs per ounce sold* $/oz sold 725 – 775 - - All-in sustaining costs(19)* $/oz sold 900 – 975 1,050 – 1,125(23) 1,000 – 1,100(23) Non-cash inventory movements and $/oz sold (75) (300)(23) ~ (100)(23) amortized advanced royalty costs(19) All-in sustaining costs (excluding non- cash inventory movements and $/oz sold 825 – 900 750 – 825(23) 900 – 1,000(23) amortized advanced royalty costs)(19)* Mine Production Costs $ millions 165 – 180 - - Sustaining Capital $ millions 10 – 15 - - Capital Resettlement Capital $ millions 15 – 20 - - Expenditures Wahgnion Construction $ millions - 115 – 120 - Wahgnion Pre-Operating Costs $ millions - ~30 - Corporate Administration Expense $ millions - - 13.0 – 14.0 Share-Based Compensation Expense(20) $ millions - - 3.5 – 4.5 Corporate and Regional Administration Costs $ millions - - 2.0 – 3.0 Refer to Endnotes (18), (19), (20), (21), (22),(23), Other and (24) in the Appendix Community Social Responsibility $ millions - - 4–5 *Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the 37 Exploration and Evaluation(21) $ millions - - 5 – 15 Appendix
Qualified Persons Statement (Teranga) The technical information contained in this document to the activity which she is undertaking to qualify as a Metallurgy and Petroleum (the "CIM") Standards on Mineral relating to the Sabodala and Wahgnion open pit mineral "Qualified Person" under NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM reserve estimates is based on, and fairly represents, for Mineral Projects. Ms. Nakai-Lajoie has consented to the Council, as may be amended from time to time by the CIM information compiled by Mr. Stephen Ling, P. Eng who is a inclusion in this document of the matters based on her ("CIM Standards"). There can be no assurance that those member of the Professional Engineers Ontario. Mr. Ling is compiled information in the form and context in which it portions of mineral resources that are not mineral reserves a full time employee of Teranga and is not "independent" appears in this document. will ultimately be converted into mineral reserves. within the meaning of NI 43-101. Mr. Ling has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation The technical information contained in this document Teranga confirms that it is not aware of any new information and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity relating to the Sabodala underground ore reserves or data that materially affects the information included in the which he is undertaking to qualify as a "Qualified Person" estimates is based on, and fairly represents, information technical reports for the Sabodala Project (August 30, 2017) under NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral compiled by Jeff Sepp, P. Eng., of Roscoe Postle and the Wahgnion Project (October 31, 2018) pursuant Projects. Mr. Ling has consented to the inclusion in this Associates Inc. (“RPA”), who is a member of the to National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for document of the matters based on his compiled information Professional Engineers Ontario. Mr. Sepp is “independent” Mineral Projects (the “Technical Reports”), or third quarter in the form and context in which it appears in this document. within the meaning of NI 43-101. Mr. Sepp has sufficient 2019 results, market announcements and, in the case of experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material The technical information contained in this document and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the relating to Sabodala, Wahgnion, and Golden Hill’s mineral he is undertaking to qualify as a “Qualified Person” under NI estimates in the relevant market announcements resource estimates is based on, and fairly represents, 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Mr. concerning the Technical Reports continue to apply and information compiled by Ms. Patti Nakai-Lajoie. Ms. Nakai- Sepp has consented to the inclusion in this document of the have not materially changed. Lajoie, P. Geo., is a Member of the Association of matters based on his compiled information in the form and Professional Geoscientists of Ontario. Ms. Nakai-Lajoie is a context in which it appears in this document. full time employee of Teranga and is not "independent" within the meaning of NI 43-101. Ms. Nakai-Lajoie has Teranga's disclosure of mineral reserve and mineral sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of resource information is governed by NI 43-101 under the mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, 38
Appendix 2 Standalone Massawa Project
Massawa Project: Historical Mineral Reserves and Resources Tonnes Grade Total Contained Tonnes Grade Total Contained Mineral Reserve Mineral Resource (Mt) (g/t Au) (Moz Au) (Mt) (g/t Au) (Moz Au) CZ Probable (Central Zone) 7.8 4.59 1.15 OP Measured - - - NZ Probable (North Zone) 5.2 4.67 0.79 OP Indicated 23 4.00 3.0 Total M&I 23 4.00 3.0 Sofia Probable 7.1 2.66 0.61 OP Inferred 3.7 2.2 0.26 Delya Probable 0.81 4.21 0.11 UG Inferred 2.6 4.1 0.35 Total Open Pit Probable Reserves 20.9 3.94 2.6 Total Inferred 6.3 3.0 0.61 Notes to reserve table above: Notes to resource table above: • Open pit Mineral Reserves are reported at a gold price of $1,200/oz and include • Open pit Mineral Resources are reported as the insitu mineral resources falling dilution and ore loss factors. within the $1,500/oz pit shell reported at an average cut-off grade of 0.8 g/t Au. • Open pit Mineral Reserves were generated by Shaun Gillespie, an employee of • Underground Mineral Resources are those insitu mineral resources below the Barrick, under the supervision of Rodney Quick, MSc, Pr Sci Nat, an officer of $1,500/oz pit shell of the North Zone 2 deposit reported at a 2.5 g/t Au cut-off grade. Barrick and Qualified Person. • Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves. • Mineral Resources for Massawa were generated by Simon Bottoms, MGeol, FGS CGeol, FAusIMM, an employee of the Barrick and Qualified Person. Source: Barrick’s July 23, 2019 “Technical Report on the Feasibility Study of the Massawa Gold Project, Senegal” 40
Standalone Massawa Project ($1,200/oz Ore Reserve Case) Production Forecast Year Yr-2 Yr-1 Yr 0 Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10 Total Production (koz) - - 221 227 201 245 237 206 245 115 162 175 25 2,060 Process Operating Cost Estimate Summary CENTRAL ZONE NORTH ZONE SOFIA MAIN SOFIA NORTH DELYA BIOX – BIOX 20% BIOX- WOL BIOX WOL BIOX Rock Type WOL 25%CZ WOL WOL Delya 100% CZ 100% NZ 100% NZ 100% Delya 100% Delya 75%NZ 80%NZ Oxide ($/t milled) 11.29 N/A N/A 11.60 N/A 11.17 12.13 12.01 N/A N/A Oxide Trans ($/t milled) 14.35 N/A N/A 13.41 N/A 12.95 12.84 13.76 N/A N/A Reduced Trans ($/t milled) 15.73 43.09 26.88 14.57 25.79 14.31 13.56 13.93 48.69 29.70 Fresh ($/t milled) 17.40 43.09 26.88 15.74 25.79 15.68 14.30 15.62 48.69 29.70 Capital Cost Estimate per Phase Description PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 TOTAL Direct Field Cost 91,278,343 10,933,099 47,559,136 149,770,578 Indirect Field Costs 21,023,557 4,253,992 12,309,577 187,357,703 Home Office Costs 12,488,244 1,456,895 5,538,306 19,483,445 Total Plant Cost 124,790,144 16,643,986 65,407,019 206,841,148 Other Costs 147,803,128 181,009 7,541,511 155,525,648 Mining Costs 37,102,894 6,525,273 6,565,398 50,193,565 Total Construction Capital 309,696,166 23,350,267 79,513,928 412,560,361 41 Source: Barrick’s July 23, 2019 “Technical Report on the Feasibility Study of the Massawa Gold Project, Senegal”
Standalone Massawa Project ($1,200/oz Ore Reserve Case) Life of Mine Estimated Capital Expenditures at $1,200/oz Gold Price Item Year -1 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Total Construction & Project Capital 89,017,300 166,523,217 77,505,917 53,009,285 26,504,643 412,560,361 On-going Capital - - 1,112,500 1,112,500 1,112,500 1,112,500 1,112,500 1,712,500 1,712,500 1,712,500 1,712,500 1,662,500 1,662,500 15,737,500 Pre-Production Capitalised - - - - - - - - - - - (10,000,000) (10,000,000) Rehabilitation Asset - - - - - - - - - - - - 23,000,000 23,000,000 Total 89,017,300 166,523,217 78,618,417 1,112,500 1,112,500 1,112,500 1,112,500 54,721,785 28,217,143 1,712,500 1,712,500 1,662,500 14,662,500 441,297,861 NPV Sensitivity at Different Gold Prices & Discount Rates ($1,200/oz Pit Shell) US millions Gold Price ($/oz) Discount 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 0% 163 339 518 696 874 1,051 1,229 5% 37 165 293 421 550 677 805 10% (34) 60 156 251 346 441 536 15% (76) (4) 69 142 215 287 360 20% (100) (43) 14 71 127 184 241 25% (113) (68) (22) 23 68 113 159 42 Source: Barrick’s July 23, 2019 “Technical Report on the Feasibility Study of the Massawa Gold Project, Senegal”
Qualified Persons Statement (Barrick) A technical report to support the feasibility study for • Rodney Quick, MSc, Pr Sci Nat; Mineral the Massawa gold project has been prepared in Resource Management and Evaluation Executive accordance with National Instrument 43-101. The of Barrick; report is dated as of 23 July 2019 and is filed on SEDAR and available at www.barrick.com. Refer to • Simon Bottoms, MGeol, FGS CGeol, FAusIMM; the Massawa Feasibility Study for further information Senior Vice President, Africa & Middle East with respect to the key assumptions, parameters and Mineral Resource Manager of Barrick; risks associated with the results of the feasibility study, the mineral reserve estimates included therein • Richard Quarmby, BSc (Chemical Engineering), and other technical information. The Massawa Pr Eng, CEng, MSAIChE, MIMMM; Africa & Feasibility Study was filed by Barrick on a voluntary Middle East Capital Projects Metallurgist of basis, and not as a result of a requirement of National Barrick; and Instrument 43-101. • Graham E. Trusler, MSc, Pr Eng, MIChE, The following QPs, as that term is defined in National MSAIChE; CEO Digby Wells Environmental Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for (Jersey) Limited. Mineral Projects, have prepared or supervised the preparation of their relevant portions of the technical information described above and the related Massawa Feasibility Study on file, and have consented to the inclusion of such information in this document: 43
Non-IFRS Performance Measures The Company provides some non-IFRS financial measures as supplementary The WGC definition of all-in sustaining costs seeks to extend the definition of improve comparability of this non-IFRS financial measure with its peers. The information that management believes may be useful to investors to explain the total cash costs by adding corporate general and administrative costs, comparative 2018 EBITDA has been restated to conform to the new Company’s financial results. Beginning in the second quarter of 2013, we reclamation and remediation costs (including accretion and amortization), presentation. EBITDA is intended to provide additional information to investors adopted an “all-in sustaining costs” measure consistent with the guidance exploration and study costs (capital and expensed), capitalized stripping costs and analysts and do not have any standardized definition under IFRS and issued by the World Gold Council (“WGC”) on June 27, 2013, of which Teranga and sustaining capital expenditures and represents the total costs of producing should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of became a member on November 27, 2018. The Company believes that the use gold from current operations. All-in sustaining costs exclude income tax performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Management believes that of all-in sustaining costs is helpful to analysts, investors and other stakeholders payments, interest costs, costs related to business acquisitions and items EBITDA is a valuable indicator of our ability to generate liquidity by producing of the Company in assessing its operating performance, its ability to generate needed to normalize profits. Consequently, this measure is not representative operating cash flow to: fund working capital needs, service debt obligations and free cash flow from current operations and its overall value. This measure is of all of the Company’s cash expenditures. In addition, the calculation of all-in fund capital expenditures. Beginning second quarter 2019, the Company helpful to governments and local communities in understanding the economics sustaining costs and all- in costs does not include depreciation expense as it adopted adjusted EBITDA as a new non-IFRS financial measure. of gold mining. The “all-in sustaining costs” is an extension of existing “cash does not reflect the impact of expenditures incurred in prior periods. Therefore, Management believes that adjusted EBITDA is a valuable indicator of our cost” metrics and incorporate costs related to sustaining production. it is not indicative of the Company’s overall profitability. The Company also ability to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow to: fund working expands upon the WGC definition of all-in sustaining costs by presenting an capital needs, service debt obligations and fund capital expenditures, after “Total cash cost per ounce sold” is a common financial performance additional measure of “All-in sustaining costs (excluding non-cash inventory adjusting for factors not reflective of the underlying performance of the measure in the gold mining industry but has no standard meaning under IFRS. movements and amortized advanced royalty costs)”. This measure excludes Company. Adjusted EBITDA is intended to provide additional information to The Company reports total cash costs on a sales basis. We believe that, in cash and non-cash inventory movements and amortized advanced royalty investors and analysts and does not have any standardized definition under addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, certain costs which management does not believe to be true cash costs and are not IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures investors use this information to evaluate the Company’s performance and fully indicative of performance for the period. of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The Company calculates ability to generate cash flow. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA adjusted to exclude unrealized and realized information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for “Total cash costs per ounce”, “all-in sustaining costs per ounce” and “all- foreign exchange gains and losses, gains and losses on derivative instruments, measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measure, in sustaining costs (excluding cash/(non-cash) inventory movements and non-cash fair value changes, impairment provisions and reversals thereof, and along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of a Company’s ability to amortized advanced royalty costs)” per ounce are intended to provide other unusual or non-recurring items. generate operating profits and cash flow from its mining operations. Total cash additional information only and do not have any standardized definition under costs figures are calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures “Free cash flow” is a non-IFRS financial measure. The Company calculates Gold Institute, which was a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measures are not free cash flow as net cash flow provided by operating activities less sustaining products and included leading North American gold producers. The Gold necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as capital expenditures. The Company believes this to be a useful indicator of our Institute ceased operations in 2002, but the standard is considered the determined under IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures ability to generate cash for growth initiatives. Other companies may calculate accepted standard of reporting cash cost of production in North America. differently. this measure differently. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measure of other companies. EBITDA is a non-IFRS financial measure, which excludes income tax and For more information and the reconciliation of these measures, please related expenses, finance costs (including accretion expense), interest income refer to the Company’s latest management’s discussion and analysis and depreciation and amortization from net (loss)/profit for the period. In 2019, accessible on the Company’s website at www.terangagold.com. Teranga amended the definition of EBITDA to exclude accretion expense to 44
Endnotes 1. Based on the NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Sabodala Gold Project dated August 30, 2017 available on the Company’s website at www.terangagold.com and SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 2. At Sabodala, the Company produced a total of 241,276 ounces of gold in 2019, exceeding its production guidance of 215,000-230,000 ounces. 3. Sabodala’s Mineral Reserve estimate as at December 31, 2018. For more information regarding Sabodala’s mineral reserves and resources and related notes, please refer to the Company’s amended and restated annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2018 dated July 31, 2019 available on the Company’s website at www.terangagold.com and SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 4. Based on Barrick Gold’s NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Feasibility Study of the Massawa Gold Project dated July 23, 2019 (the “Massawa Feasibility Study”) available at www.barrick.com and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 5. The Massawa project’s standalone historical mineral reserve estimate as at December 31, 2018 at a $1,200 gold price pit shell mineral reserves. For more information regarding the Massawa project’s ore reserve and mineral resource estimates and related notes, please refer to the Massawa Feasibility Study available at www.barrick.com and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 6. Based on Teranga’s amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Wahgnion Gold Operations dated July 31, 2019 (the “Wahgnion Technical Report”) available on the Company’s website at www.terangagold.com and SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 7. At Wahgnion, the Company produced a total of 47,492 ounces of gold in 2019, exceeding its production guidance of 30,000-40,000 ounces. 8. Wahgnion’s Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates as at May 31, 2018. Mineral Reserves are estimated using a gold price of $1,250 per ounce. Mineral Resources are estimated using a long-term gold price of $1,500 per ounce, adjusted to match existing industry standards. For more information regarding Wahgnion’s Mineral Reserves and Resources and related notes, please refer to the Wahgnion Technical Report available on the Company’s website at www.terangagold.com and SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 9. Golden Hill’s Mineral Resource estimate as at November 30, 2018. For more information regarding Golden Hill’s Mineral Resource and related notes, please refer to the press release dated February 21, 2019 available on the Company’s website at www.terangagold.com and SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 10) Life of mine assumptions include: Gold Price $1,250 per ounce Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO): Wahgnion - $0.59 per litre; Sabodala - $0.46 per litre Light Fuel Oil (LFO): Wahgnion - $1.04 per litre ($0.88 per litre during construction period); Sabodala - $0.81 per litre Euro to USD Exchange Rate: $1.10. 11) This production target is based on proven and probable reserves only from Teranga’s Sabodala Project as at December 31, 2018. For more information regarding Sabodala’s Mineral Reserves and Resources and related notes, please refer to the amended and restated annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2018 dated July 31, 2019 available on the Company’s website at www.terangagold.com and SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 12) This Sabodala free cash flow is an estimate that is based on the updated life of mine plan and reserve estimate for the Sabodala project, as set out in the Technical Report of Teranga for the Sabodala Project, Senegal, West Africa, dated August 30, 2017 (the “Sabodala Technical Report”). See in particular Section 21 of the Sabodala Technical Report - Capital and Operating Costs. 45
You can also read