Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow subject to nonlinear heat flux and heat source/sink

Page created by Carl Fernandez
 
CONTINUE READING
Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow subject to nonlinear heat flux and heat source/sink
Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2020, 7(3), 279–286

                                                                     doi: 10.1093/jcde/qwaa023
                                                                     Journal homepage: www.jcde.org
                                                                     Advance Access Publication Date: 8 April 2020

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in

                                                                                                                                                       Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcde/article/7/3/279/5818057 by guest on 11 November 2020
rotating flow subject to nonlinear heat flux and heat
source/sink
M. Ijaz Khan1,4, *, Tehreem Nasir1,4 , T. Hayat1,2,4 , Niaz B. Khan3,4 and
A. Alsaedi2,4
1
 Department of Mathematics, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan; 2 Nonlinear Analysis and
Applied Mathematics (NAAM) Research Group, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box 80207,
Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia; 3 School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, National University of
Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan and 4 Department of Mathematics, Riphah International
University, Faisalabad Campus, Satiana Road, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
*Corresponding author. E-mail: ijazfmg khan@yahoo.com

Abstract
Time-dependent rotating flow in presence of heat source/sink, applied magnetic field, Joule heating, thermal radiation, and
viscous dissipation is considered. Chemical reaction with Arrhenius activation energy is implemented. The governing
partial differential equations have been reduced to ordinary differential systems. Shooting scheme is implemented for the
computations of governing systems. Graphical results are arranged for velocity, temperature, and concentration, skin
friction coefficients, and heat and mass transfer rates. Main results are mentioned in conclusion portion. It is analyzed that
velocity decays in the presence of magnetic variable while temperature and concentration fields are enhanced via Eckert
number and fitted rate constant. Moreover drag force and mass and heat transfer rates decrease through higher
estimations of rotation rate variable, magnetic parameter, and Eckert number.

Keywords: rotating flow; Arrhenius activation energy; thermal radiation; heat source/sink; Joule heating; viscous dissipation

1. Introduction                                                              activation energy variable. They also concluded that heat and
                                                                             mass transfer have same behavior through Weissenberg num-
Numerous chemically reacting procedures comprise the species
                                                                             ber. Unsteady rotating liquid flow in the presence of binary
with Arrhenius activation energy like oil reservoir engineer-
                                                                             chemical reaction is explored by Awad, Motsa, and Khumalo
ing and occurring in geothermal system. The relations between
                                                                             (2014). Hayat, Ijaz Khan, Tamoor, Waqas, and Alsaedi (2018)
chemical reactions and mass transport are usually very com-
                                                                             discussed Arrhenius activation energy in binary chemically re-
posite and can be examined in many reactions at different
                                                                             active stagnation point flow over a stretchable surface. They
rates. Recently Khan, Hayat, Khan, and Alsaedi (2018) investi-
                                                                             implemented Runge–Kutta–Fehlberg approach for the impact
gated Arrhenius activation energy impact in stagnation point
                                                                             of different flow variables. The obtained computations divulge
flow with nonlinear thermal radiation and heat source/sink.
                                                                             that species concentration enhances through larger estima-
They examined that concentration species increases for larger
                                                                             tion of activation energy variable while it decreases for larger

Received: 28 December 2018; Revised: 14 March 2019; Accepted: 29 June 2019

C The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Computational Design and Engineering. This is an Open Access

article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits
unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                                                                                                                                               279
Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow subject to nonlinear heat flux and heat source/sink
280     Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow

Schmidt number. Furthermore contrast behavior is examined            Sherwood number have been examined and discussed graphi-
for heat and mass transfer rates when compared with skin fric-       cally. Concluding remarks are pointed out. Ahmad, Khan, Hayat,
tion coefficient. Stagnation point flow of Carreau-nanomaterial      Khan, and Alsaedi (2018), Baiguzin, Burmistrov, Kuznetsov, and
with activation energy and thermal radiation is examined by          Farakhov (2019), Hayat, Khan, Alsaedi, and Khan (2017b), Hayat,
Hsiao (2017a). The problem is discussed in the presence of           Khan, Farooq, Gull, and Alsaedi (2016), Hayat, Khan, Qayyum,
mixed convection, activation energy, thermal radiation, MHD,         Khan, and Alsaedi (2018), Hayat, Khan, Waqas, and Alsaedi
and Ohmic dissipation. Nonlinear expressions are tackled nu-         (2017b, 2017c), Hayat, Kiyani, Alsaedi, Khan, and Ahmad (2018),
merically with the help of parameters control method. The            Hayat, Qayyum, Khan, and Alsaedi (2017), Hayat, Tamoor, Khan,
obtained computations investigate that temperature field en-         and Alsaedi (2016), Hsiao (2016, 2017b, 2017c), Javed, Abbas,
hances for higher estimation of radiative variable. It is also ex-   Sajid, and Ali (2011), Khan, Alsaedi, Qayyum, Hayat, and Khan
amined that larger efficiency system of thermal energy is ob-        (2019), Khan, Hayat, Waqas, Khan, and Alsaedi (2018), Khan,
tained for higher/lower estimations of flow variables. Activa-       Ibrahim, Khan, Hayat, and Javed (2018), Khan, Khan, Hayat, and
tion energy impact in nanomaterial Couette–Poiseuille flow with      Alsaedi (2018), Khan, Tamoor, Hayat, and Alsaedi (2017), Nazar,
convective boundary conditions is scrutinized by Zeeshan, She-       Amin, and Pop (2004), Tamoor, Waqas, Khan, Alsaedi, and Hayat
hzad, and Ellahi (2018). Here Buongiorno model is used for the       (2017), Turkyilmazoglu (2016, 2017a, 2017b, 2018a,2018b), Waqas,

                                                                                                                                                                          Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcde/article/7/3/279/5818057 by guest on 11 November 2020
description of formulation. Further nonlinear expressions are        Khan, Hayat, and Alsaedi (2017), Waqas, Khan, Hayat, Alsaedi,
tackled by homotopy analysis method. The obtained outcome            and Khan (2017), and Yasmeen, Hayat, Khan, Imtiaz, and Alsaedi
presents that nanoparticle volume fraction is directly propor-       (2016) represent the solution methodology for Newtonian and
tional to reaction and activation parameters while the impact        non-Newtonian fluid models.
of Brownian variable on concentration profile gives contrast be-
havior to that of thermophoresis variable. Ahmad, Farooq, Javed,
and Anjum (2018), Boivin, Cannac, and Métayer (2019), Hayat         2. Mathematical Description
et al. (2016), Hayat, Khan, Farooq, Yasmeen, and Alsaedi (2016),     Let us consider three-dimensional (3D) flow of viscous liquid
Hayat, Khan, Qayyum, Alsaedi, and Khan (2018), Hayat, Khan,          by a stretchable surface. Arrhenius activation energy for chem-
Waqas, and Alsaedi (2017a), Hayat, Waqas, Khan, Alsaedi, and         ical reaction process is considered. Heat transport mechanism
Shehzad (2017), Irfan, Khan, Khan, and Gulzar (2019), Khan,          is examined in the presence of linear radiative flux. Further-
Khan, Waqas, Hayat, and Alsaedi (2017), Khan, Waqas, Hayat,          more Joule heating and dissipation effect are considered. Fluid is
and Alsaedi (2017), Khan, Waqas, Hayat, Alsaedi, and Khan            conducted electrically via applied magnetic field. Low magnetic
(2017), Khan, Yasmeen, Khan, Farooq, and Wakeel (2016), Lin          Reynolds number leads to omission of induced magnetic field.
and Luo (2018), Sheikholeslami et al. (2019), and Xie, Xiao, and     Let us assumed Tw and C w as surface temperature and concen-
Ren (2018) show the chemically reactive flows with different flow    tration while T∞ and C ∞ being ambient temperature and con-
assumptions.                                                         centration (see Fig. 1).
    Time-dependent flows in rotating frame have various ap-              The governing flow expressions in the presence of Arrhenius
plications in geophysical fluid dynamics, chemical, mechani-         activation energy are (Awad, Motsa, & Khumalo, 2014)
cal, and nuclear engineering systems. Viscoelastic nanomaterial
flow with convective boundary conditions due to rotating disks
is analyzed by Hayat, Javed, Imtiaz, and Alsaedi (2017). Qayyum,
Khan, Hayat, and Alsaedi (2018) examined viscous liquid flow                                          ∂u   ∂v   ∂w
                                                                                                         +    +    = 0,                                            (1)
submerged in five different nanoparticles. Kumar and Sood                                             ∂x   ∂y   ∂z
                                                                                                                                                                  
(2017) explored MHD flow of copper-water nanoliquid due to ro-       ∂u    ∂u    ∂u    ∂u           1 ∂p                                     ∂2u   ∂2v  ∂2w
                                                                        +u    +v    +w    + 2u = −      +ν                                       + 2 +
tating permeable medium with chemical reaction. Optimization         ∂t    ∂x    ∂y    ∂z           ρ ∂x                                     ∂ x2  ∂y   ∂z2
of entropy generation with Ag-H2 O and Cu-H2 O nanoparticles
                                                                                                                            σ B02
is studied by Hayat, Khan, Qayyum, and Alsaedi (2018). Turkyil-                                                        −          u,                               (2)
                                                                                                                             ρ
mazoglu (2012) developed an analytical technique for MHD 3D                                                                                                       
stagnation point flow by a rotating disk. Hayat, Qayyum, Khan,        ∂v    ∂v    ∂v    ∂v           1 ∂p                                    ∂ v
                                                                                                                                              2
                                                                                                                                                   ∂ v2
                                                                                                                                                       ∂ v     2
                                                                         +u    +v    +w    − 2v = −      +v                                      + 2 + 2
and Alsaedi (2018) investigated MHD radiative flow by a rotating      ∂t    ∂x    ∂y    ∂z           ρ ∂y                                    ∂ x2  ∂y  ∂z
disk with entropy generation and dissipative heat. Chemically                                          σ B02
vapor deposition chamber through perforated showerhead due                                                    v,        −                                          (3)
                                                                                                        ρ
to rotating disk is studied by Liu, Peng, Lai, Huang, and Liang                                        2                  
                                                                              ∂w    ∂w    ∂w    ∂w      ∂ w      ∂2w   ∂2w
(2017). Doh and Muthtamilselvan (2017) explored MHD flow of                      +u    +v    +w    =v          +     +       ,                                     (4)
                                                                              ∂t    ∂x    ∂y    ∂z      ∂x  2    ∂y2   ∂z2
non-Newtonian material with thermophoretic particle deposi-                                                                                                 ⎫
                                                                                                           2       2        2
tion due to rotating disk. Hayat, Khan, Alsaedi, and Khan (2017a)    ∂T
                                                                     ∂t   + u ∂∂Tx + v ∂∂Ty + w ∂∂z
                                                                                                  T =α ∂ T + ∂ T + ∂ T              − ρc1p ∂qr    σ    2  2   2 ⎪
                                                                                                                                            ∂z + ρc p Bo u + v ⎪⎪
                                                                                    ⎡                    ∂ x2     ∂ y2      ∂z2          ⎤                      ⎪
                                                                                                                                                                ⎬
                                                                                                2       2           2
examined nanomaterial flow with dissipation and Joule heating.                                2   ∂u  + 2   ∂v    +  2   ∂w     +
                                                                                    ⎢             ∂z        ∂z           ∂z             ⎥                          ⎪
Yao and Lian (2018) worked on rotationally symmetric flow by an             + ρcμp ⎣              2            2 
                                                                                                                                            Q
                                                                                                                                     2 ⎦ + ρcop (T − T∞ ) ,       ⎪
                                                                                                                                                                   ⎪
                                                                                                                                                                   ⎪
                                                                                          ∂v + ∂u       ∂u + ∂w            ∂v + ∂w                                 ⎭
                                                                                          ∂x    ∂y   +  ∂z     ∂x      +   ∂z     ∂y
infinite rotating disk.
    This article addresses impacts of binary chemical reaction                                                                                                      (5)
with Arrhenius activation energy in time dependent flow of                                                                                         
rotating viscous fluid over a stretched surface. Heat trans-              ∂C    ∂C    ∂C    ∂C               ∂ 2C   ∂ 2C    ∂ 2C
                                                                             +u    +v    +w    = D                +      +
port features are characterized for radiative heat flux and heat          ∂t    ∂x    ∂y    ∂z               ∂ x2   ∂ y2    ∂z2
                                                                                                              n             
source/sink. Further dissipation and Joule heating are consid-                                                  T         −E a
                                                                                                       − kr2        exp          (C − C ∞ ) , (6)
ered. The nonlinear coupled systems are tackled numerically                                                    T∞          κT
by built-in-shooting technique (Hayat, Khan, Imtiaz, Alseadi,                                                                        
                                                                             u = uw = ax, v = 0, w = 0, T = Tw , C = C w , at z = 0,
& Waqas, 2016). Rate of heat transfer, surface drag force, and                                                                                (7)
                                                                                 u → 0, w → 0, T → T∞ , C → C ∞ as z → ∞.
Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow subject to nonlinear heat flux and heat source/sink
Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2020, 7(3), 279–286                                                 281

                                                                                                                                                                                                        Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcde/article/7/3/279/5818057 by guest on 11 November 2020
Figure 1: Schematic flow analysis.

                                                                                                                                              Ea
Here u, v, w indicate velocity components, p pressure, , σ, ρ                                  source/sink variable, E (=                   κ T∞
                                                                                                                                                    ) non-dimensional activation en-
density, ν(= μρ ) kinematic viscosity, α(= ρck ) thermal diffusivity,                           ergy, and E c(=           a2 x2
                                                                                                                                   )   Eckert number.
                                                        p                                                            c p (Tw −T∞ )
T temperature, qr radiative heat flux, c p specific heat, Q 0 heat
source/sink coefficient, T∞ ambient temperature, C concentra-
tion, B0 strength of magnetic field, C ∞ ambient concentration, D                               3. Quantities of Physical Curiosity
solutal diffusivity, kr reaction rate, E a modified Arrhenius func-                             Mathematically coefficient of skin friction and rates of heat (Nux )
tion, n fitted rate constant, κ = 8.61 × 10−5 eV/k Boltzmann con-                               and mass (Shx ) transfer are
stant, a dimensional constant, Tw surface temperature, and C w
                                                                                                                                                    y
surface concentration.                                                                                                 τwx             y           τw                     xqw
                                                                                                         C xf =                  , Cf =                     , Nux =                ,
   Considering                                                                                                       ρ(ax)
                                                                                                                             2
                                                                                                                                              ρ(ax)
                                                                                                                                                        2             k (Tw − T∞ )

                                                  √                    ⎫                                                                                                 x jw
         u = axf  (ξ, η) , v = axh (ξ, η) , w = − aνξ f (ξ, η) ,      ⎬                                                                                    Shx =                  ,             (14)
                                                                                                                                                                   D (C w − C ∞ )
θ (ξ, η) = Tw −T∞ , φ (ξ, η) = C w −C ∞ , η = νξ z, ξ = 1 − e , τ = at.⎭
            T−T∞                 C −C ∞         a            −τ
                                                                                                            y
                                                                                                where τwx , τw , qw , and jw are defined as
                                                                                          (8)                                                               
                                                                                                                     ∂u               ∂v                 ∂T
                                                                                                        τwx = μ         |z=0 , τwy = μ |z=0 , qw = −k          |z=0 ,
                                                                                                                     ∂z               ∂z                  ∂z
   Incompressibility equation (1) trivially satisfied and remain-
                                                                                                                                                            
ing flow expressions become                                                                                                                               ∂C
                                                                                                                                               J w = −k         |z=0 .                           (15)
                                                                                                                                                          ∂z
          η                                                          ∂f
   f + (1 − ξ ) f  + ξ f f  − f 2 + 2hλ − M f  = ξ (1 − ξ )
    
                                                                          , (9)
          2                                                            ∂ξ                       Finally, one arrives
           η                                                          ∂h
    h + (1 − ξ ) h + ξ ( f h − f h − 2hλ − Mh) = ξ (1 − ξ )         , (10)                                              C xf (Rex )
                                                                                                                                             1/2
                                                                                                                                                    = ξ −1/2 f  (0),                           (16)
           2                                                          ∂ξ
                                                                   ⎫
            θ (1 + R) + 2η (1 − ξ ) θ  + ξ f θ  + ME cξ f 2 + h2 ⎬
         1 
                                                                                                                                                    = ξ −1/2 h (0),
                                                                                                                                  y          1/2
         Pr                                                                                                                  C f (Rex )                                                          (17)
                     2                                           ⎭
                                                                           (11)
                +E c f + h2 + Q ∗ ξ θ = ξ (1 − ξ ) ∂θ     ∂ξ
                                                              ,
                1  η                                                                          Table 1: Comparative investigation of present analysis and Javed et
                  φ + (1 − ξ ) φ  + ξ f φ 
               Sc        2                                                                      al. (2011) when M = 0.
                                             
                                        −E                   ∂φ
               − σ ξ φ (1 + δθ ) exp            = ξ (1 − ξ )    ,                      (12)     λ            Javed et al. (2011)                                         Present results
                                       1 + δθ                ∂ξ
                                                                                                                                                                   
  f (ξ, 0) = 0, f  (ξ, 0) = 1, h (ξ, 0) = 0, θ (ξ, 0) = 1, φ (ξ, 0) = 1, ξ ≥ 0,                           − f (0)                         −h (0)                − f (0)               −h (0)
      f  (ξ, ∞) → 0, h (ξ, ∞) → 0, θ (ξ, ∞) → 0, φ (ξ, ∞) → 0, ξ ≥ 0.
                                                                                                0.2      1.3474169                0.37015223                    1.3474202         0.3701522
                                                                                       (13)     0.5      1.5194131                0.76251409                    1.5194194         0.76251423
             σ Bo2
                                                                                                2.0      2.2827966                1.8485044                     2.2828126         1.8485027
                                                                  
Here M(=      ρa
                     ) indicates magnetic variable, λ(=           a
                                                                    )   rotation rate           5.0      3.3444338                3.0609192                     3.3444607         3.0609160
                       kr2                                              16σ ∗ T∞
                                                                               3
parameter, σ (=        a
                             ) chemical reaction variable, R(=           3kk∗
                                                                                   ) radia-     10.0     4.6017220                4.3990640                     4.6017645         4.3990572
                                                            (ρc ) ν
tive variable, Sc(= Dν ) Schmidt number, Pr(= kp ) Prandtl num-                                 50.0    10.058172                 9.9668099                    10.058259          9.9667986
ber, δ(= TwT−T
            ∞
              ∞
                ) temperature difference variable, Q ∗ (= (ρcQp0) a ) heat
Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow subject to nonlinear heat flux and heat source/sink
282         Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow

                                                                                                                                                            Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcde/article/7/3/279/5818057 by guest on 11 November 2020
                                                                                      Figure 4: h(η) versus λ.
Figure 2: f (η) versus λ.

                                                                                      Figure 5: θ (η) versus Ec.
Figure 3: f (η) versus M.

                        1          −1/2
                            (Rex )      Nux = −ξ −1/2 θ  (0),                 (18)
                       1+ R
                                        −1/2
                               (Rex )          Shx = −ξ −1/2 φ  (0).          (19)
                    (ax) x
where Rex (=          ν
                           )   represents the local Reynolds number.

4. Communicational Representation of
   Results
In this portion the built-in-shooting technique is implemented
to solve the nonlinear coupled equations (9–12). The factors for
example fluid velocity i.e. f  (η) in x-direction, h(η) in y-direction,
fluid temperature θ(η), species concentration φ(η), drag force
                                    0.5  y      0.5
in x- and y-directions (C xf (Rex ) , C f (Rex ) ), heat transfer rate
                                                                                      Figure 6: θ (η) versus Pr.
             −0.5                                                       −0.5
(Nux (Rex )  ), and mass transfer rate (Shx (Rex )    ) have been
plotted by taking estimation of different flow variables as mag-
netic variable M = 0.5, rotation rate parameter λ = 0.2, chemi-
                                                                                      leads to monotonic exponential decrease in f  (η) and h(η). Phys-
cal reaction variable σ = 0.3, radiative variable R = 0.5, Schmidt
                                                                                      ically magnetic field creates resistive force, called Lorentz force
number Sc = 0.9, Prandtl number Pr = 1.5, temperature differ-
                                                                                      to the liquid flow. That is why liquid velocity decays. The same
ence variable δ = 1.0, heat source/sink variable Q ∗ = 0.5, non-
                                                                                      observation has been presented by Nazar et al. (2004). Impact
dimensional activation energy E = 1.5, fitted rate constant n =
                                                                                      of Eckert number on θ(η) is plotted in Fig. 5. Here thermal field
0.5, and Eckert number E c = 1.0. The present results compared
                                                                                      is an increasing function of Eckert number. It is due to the fact
with Javed et al. (2011) and found good agreement (See Table 1).
                                                                                      that internal energy of liquid particles increases. Therefore tem-
    Figures 2–4 elucidate the significance of rotation parameter
                                                                                      perature field enhances. Figure 6 highlights the impact of Prandtl
(λ) and magnetic parameter (M) on velocity fields f  (η) and h(η).
                                                                                      number on θ(η). Larger estimation of Prandtl yield less diffusivity
From Figs 2–4, it is examined that an enhancement in λ and M
Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow subject to nonlinear heat flux and heat source/sink
Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2020, 7(3), 279–286         283

                                                                                                                                             Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcde/article/7/3/279/5818057 by guest on 11 November 2020
Figure 7: θ(η) versus R.                                                Figure 10: φ(η) versus Sc.

Figure 8: θ(η) versus δ.
                                                                        Figure 11: φ(η) versus σ .

                                                                        tion. Figure 10 provides influences for Schmidt number on con-
                                                                        centration field. Here φ(η) shows decreasing impact for larger
                                                                        Schmidt number. Physically Schmidt number contains Brown-
                                                                        ian diffusivity and enhancement in Schmidt number provides
                                                                        lower Brownian diffusivity. That is why concentration field de-
                                                                        cays. Figure 11 illustrates the impact of chemical reaction vari-
                                                                        able (σ ) on concentration. It is examined that (σ ) decays both
                                                                        concentration field and solutal layer. Physically higher estima-
                                                                        tion of chemical reaction variation causes a thickening of solutal
                                                                        layer. Therefore concentration profile decays.
                                                                              Figures 12–15 elaborate analysis of drag forces
                                                                                    0.5  y       0.5
                                                                        (C xf (Rex ) , C f (Rex ) ) and heat and mass transfer rates
                                                                                    −0.5             −0.5
                                                                        (Nux (Rex )  , Shx (Rex ) ). From these figures, it is examined
                                                                        that magnitude of surface drag forces in x- and y-directions
                                                                        decrease versus rotation rate parameter (see Figs 12 and 13).
Figure 9: φ(η) versus n.
                                                                        From Figs 14 and 15, it is analyzed that both heat and mass
                                                                        transfer rates diminish for higher estimations of rotation rate
which decays the temperature and associated layer thickness.            parameter and Eckert number.
Figure 7 highlights R characteristics versus temperature. It is ex-
amined that both θ(η) and thermal layer have been increased via
higher estimation of radiation variable. Physically due to a rise       5. Concluding Remarks
in radiative variable the kinetic energy of inside fluid particles      Unsteady 3D flow of viscous rotating liquid by a sheet is consid-
enhances and as a result θ(η) increases. Figure 8 addresses be-         ered. Main results are as follows:
havior of temperature difference variable on concentration field.
From Fig. 8 it is observed that temperature is gradually enhanced         r f  (ζ ) decays when magnetic variable is increased.
for higher estimation of temperature ratio variable (δ). Figure 9         r θ(η) is an increasing function of radiative variable.
is plotted to investigate the fitted rate constant variable (n). Here     r Higher estimation of Eckert number enhance the tempera-
larger estimations of fitted rate constant give rise to concentra-          ture field.
Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow subject to nonlinear heat flux and heat source/sink
284       Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow

                                                                      r Schmidt number and chemical reaction parameter corre-
                                                                        spond to a decay in concentration field.
                                                                      r Skin friction decays in both x- and y-directions for higher es-
                                                                        timation of rotation variable.
                                                                      r Temperature and concentration gradients decrease via mag-
                                                                        netic parameter, rotation parameter, and Eckert number.

                                                                     Conflict of interest statement
                                                                     The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest and
                                                                     the paper presents their own work that does not been infringe
                                                                     any third-party rights, especially authorship of any part of the
                                                                     article is an original contribution, not published before and not
                                                                     being under consideration for publication elsewhere.

                                                                                                                                               Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcde/article/7/3/279/5818057 by guest on 11 November 2020
Figure 12: Combines effects of M and λ on C xf Re0.5
                                                 x .

                                                                     References
                                                                     Ahmad, S., Farooq, M., Javed, M., & Anjum, A. (2018). Double
                                                                        stratification effects in chemically reactive squeezed Sut-
                                                                        terby fluid flow with thermal radiation and mixed convec-
                                                                        tion. Results in Physics, 8, 1250–1259.
                                                                     Ahmad, S., Khan, M. I., Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., & Alsaedi, A. (2018).
                                                                        Entropy generation optimization and unsteady squeezing
                                                                        flow of viscous fluid with five different shapes of nanopar-
                                                                        ticles. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering
                                                                        Aspects, 554, 197–210.
                                                                     Awad, F. G., Motsa, S., & Khumalo, M. (2014). Heat and mass
                                                                        transfer in unsteady rotating fluid flow with binary chemi-
                                                                        cal reaction and activation energy. Plos One, 9, e107622.
                                                                     Baiguzin, F. A., Burmistrov, D. A., Kuznetsov, V. A., & Farakhov, M.
                                                                        I. (2019). Theoretical description and numerical modelling of
                                                                        dehydration of tert-butanol via reactive distillation at con-
                                             y                          current flow of liquid and vapor phases. Chemical Engineering
Figure 13: Combines effects of M and λ on C f Re0.5
                                                x .
                                                                        Science, 200, 73–79.
                                                                     Boivin, P., Cannac, M. A., & Métayer, O. L. (2019). A thermo-
                                                                        dynamic closure for the simulation of multiphase reactive
                                                                        flows. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 137, 640–649.
                                                                     Doh, D. H., & Muthtamilselvan, M. (2017). Thermophoretic parti-
                                                                        cle deposition on magnetohydrodynamic flow of micropolar
                                                                        fluid due to a rotating disk. International Journal of Mechanical
                                                                        Sciences, 130, 350–359.
                                                                     Hayat, T., Ijaz Khan, M., Tamoor, M., Waqas, M., & Alsaedi,
                                                                        A. (2018). Magneto-hydrodynamical numerical simulation of
                                                                        heat transfer in MHD stagnation point flow of cross fluid
                                                                        model towards a stretched surface. Physics and Chemistry of
                                                                        Liquids, 56, 584–595.
                                                                     Hayat, T., Javed, M., Imtiaz, M., & Alsaedi, A. (2017). Convec-
                                                                        tive flow of Jeffrey nanofluid due to two stretchable rotating
                                                                        disks. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 240, 291–302.
Figure 14: Combines effects of M and λ on    1
                                            1+R
                                                  Nux Re−0.5
                                                        x    .       Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., Alsaedi, A., & Khan, M. I. (2017a). Joule
                                                                        heating and viscous dissipation in flow of nanomaterial by
                                                                        a rotating disk. International Communications in Heat and Mass
                                                                        Transfer, 89, 190–197.
                                                                     Hayat, T., Khan, M. W. A., Alsaedi, A., & Khan, M. I. (2017b).
                                                                        Squeezing flow of second grade liquid subject to non-Fourier
                                                                        heat flux and heat generation/absorption. Colloid and Polymer
                                                                        Science, 295, 967–975.
                                                                     Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., Farooq, M., Alsaedi, A., Waqas, M., & Yas-
                                                                        meen, T. (2016). Impact of Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model
                                                                        in flow of variable thermal conductivity fluid over a variable
                                                                        thicked surface. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,
                                                                        99, 702–710.
                                                                     Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., Farooq, M., Gull, N., & Alsaedi, A. (2016). Un-
                                                                        steady three-dimensional mixed convection flow with vari-

Figure 15: Combines effects of M and Ec on Shx Re−0.5
                                                 x    .
Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow subject to nonlinear heat flux and heat source/sink
Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2020, 7(3), 279–286                285

   able viscosity and thermal conductivity. Journal of Molecular          Irfan, M., Khan, W. A., Khan, M., & Gulzar, M. M. (2019). Influ-
   Liquids, 223, 1297–1310.                                                   ence of Arrhenius activation energy in chemically reactive
Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., Farooq, M., Yasmeen, T., & Alsaedi, A.                radiative flow of 3D Carreau nanofluid with nonlinear mixed
   (2016). Stagnation point flow with Cattaneo–Christov heat                  convection. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 125, 141–
   flux and homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions. Journal of                   152.
   Molecular Liquids, 220, 49–55.                                         Javed, T., Abbas, Z., Sajid, M., & Ali, N. (2011). Non-similar solu-
Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., Imtiaz, M., Alseadi, A., & Waqas, M. (2016).          tion for rotating flow over an exponentially stretching sur-
   Similarity transformation approach for ferromagnetic mixed                 face. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid
   convection flow in the presence of chemically reactive mag-                Flow, 21, 903–908.
   netic dipole. AIP, Physics of Fluids, 28, 102003.                      Khan, M. I., Alsaedi, A., Qayyum, S., Hayat, T., & Khan, M. I. (2019).
Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., Qayyum, S., & Alsaedi, A. (2018). Entropy             Entropy generation optimization in flow of Prandtl–Eyring
   generation in flow with silver and copper nanoparticles. Col-              nanofluid with binary chemical reaction and Arrhenius acti-
   loids and Surfaces A, 539, 335–346.                                        vation energy. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and En-
Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., Qayyum, S., Alsaedi, A., & Khan, M. I. (2018).        gineering Aspects, 570, 117–126.
   New thermodynamics of entropy generation minimization                  Khan, M. I., Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., & Alsaedi, A. (2018). Activation

                                                                                                                                                      Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcde/article/7/3/279/5818057 by guest on 11 November 2020
   with nonlinear thermal radiation and nanomaterials. Physics                energy impact in nonlinear radiative stagnation point flow
   Letters A, 382, 749–760.                                                   of Cross nanofluid. International Communications in Heat and
Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., Qayyum, S., Khan, M. I., & Alsaedi, A. (2018).        Mass Transfer, 91, 216–224.
   Entropy generation for flow of Sisko fluid due to rotating disk.       Khan, M. I., Hayat, T., Waqas, M., Khan, M. I., & Alsaedi,
   Journal of Molecular Liquids, 264, 375–385.                                A. (2018). Entropy generation minimization (EGM) in non-
Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., Waqas, M., & Alsaedi, A. (2017a). Effective-          linear mixed convective flow of nanomaterial with Joule
   ness of magnetic nanoparticles in radiative flow of Eyring–                heating and slip condition. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 256,
   Powell fluid. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 231, 126–133.                  108–120.
Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., Waqas, M., & Alsaedi, A. (2017b). On              Khan, N. B., Ibrahim, Z., Khan, M. I., Hayat, T., & Javed, M. F.
   Cattaneo–Christov heat flux in the flow of variable ther-                  (2018). VIV study of an elastically mounted cylinder hav-
   mal conductivity Eyring–Powell fluid. Results in Physics, 7,               ing low mass-damping ratio using RANS model. International
   446–450.                                                                   Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 121, 309–314.
Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., Waqas, M., & Alsaedi, A. (2017c). Newtonian       Khan, M. W. A, Khan, M. I., Hayat, T., & Alsaedi, A. (2018). Entropy
   heating effect in nanofluid flow by a permeable cylinder. Re-              generation minimization (EGM) of nanofluid flow by a thin
   sults in Physics, 7, 256–262.                                              moving needle with nonlinear thermal radiation. Physica B:
Hayat, T., Kiyani, M. Z., Alsaedi, A., Khan, M. I., & Ahmad, I. (2018).       Condensed Matter, 534, 113–119.
   Mixed convective three-dimensional flow of Williamson                  Khan, M. I., Khan, M. I., Waqas, M., Hayat, T., & Alsaedi, A. (2017).
   nanofluid subject to chemical reaction. International Journal              Chemically reactive flow of Maxwell liquid due to variable
   of Heat and Mass Transfer, 127, 422–429.                                   thicked surface. International Communications in Heat and Mass
Hayat, T., Qayyum, S., Khan, M. I., & Alsaedi, A. (2017). Modern              Transfer, 86, 231–238.
   developments about statistical declaration and probable er-            Khan, M. I., Tamoor, M., Hayat, T., & Alsaedi, A. (2017). MHD
   ror for skin friction and Nusselt number with copper and sil-              Boundary layer thermal slip flow by nonlinearly stretch-
   ver nanoparticles. Chinese Journal of Physics, 55, 2501–2513.              ing cylinder with suction/blowing and radiation. Results in
Hayat, T., Qayyum, S., Khan, M. I., & Alsaedi, A. (2018). Entropy             Physics, 7, 1207–1211.
   generation in magnetohydrodynamic radiative flow due to                Khan, M. I., Waqas, M., Hayat, T., & Alsaedi, A. (2017). A compara-
   rotating disk in presence of viscous dissipation and Joule                 tive study of Casson fluid with homogeneous-heterogeneous
   heating. AIP, Physics of Fluids, 30, 017101.                               reactions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 498,
Hayat, T., Tamoor, M., Khan, M. I., & Alsaedi, A. (2016). Numerical           85–90.
   simulation for nonlinear radiative flow by convective cylin-           Khan, M. I., Waqas, M., Hayat, T., Alsaedi, A., & Khan, M. I. (2017).
   der. Results in Physics, 6, 1031–1035.                                     Significance of nonlinear radiation in mixed convection flow
Hayat, T., Waqas, M., khan, M. I., Alsaedi, A., & Shehzad, S. A.              of magneto Walter-B nanoliquid. International Journal of Hy-
   (2017). Magnetohydrodynamic flow of Burgers fluid with heat                drogen Energy, 42, 26408–26416.
   source and power law heat flux. Chinese Journal of Physics, 55,        Khan, M. I., Yasmeen, T., Khan, M. I., Farooq, M., & Wakeel,
   318–330.                                                                   M. (2016). Research progress in the development of nat-
Hsiao, K. L. (2016). Stagnation electrical MHD nanofluid mixed                ural gas as fuel for road vehicles: A bibliographic review
   convection with slip boundary on a stretching sheet. Applied               (1991–2016). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 66,
   Thermal Engineering, 98, 850–861.                                          702–741.
Hsiao, K. L. (2017a). To promote radiation electrical MHD acti-           Kumar, R., & Sood, S. (2017). Combined influence of fluctuations
   vation energy thermal extrusion manufacturing system effi-                 in the temperature and stretching velocity of the sheet on
   ciency by using Carreau-nanofluid with parameters control                  MHD flow of Cu-water nanofluid through rotating porous
   method. Energy, 130, 486–499.                                              medium with cubic auto-catalysis chemical reaction. Journal
Hsiao, K. L. (2017b). Combined electrical MHD heat transfer ther-             of Molecular Liquids, 237, 347–360.
   mal extrusion system using Maxwell fluid with radiative and            Lin, C., & Luo, K. H. (2018). MRT discrete Boltzmann method for
   viscous dissipation effects. Applied Thermal Engineering, 112,             compressible exothermic reactive flows. Computers & Fluids,
   1281–1288.                                                                 166, 176–183.
Hsiao, K. L. (2017c). Micropolar nanofluid flow with MHD and vis-         Liu, Y. H., Peng, G. J., Lai, W. C., Huang, C. Y., & Liang, J. H. (2017).
   cous dissipation effects towards a stretching sheet with mul-              Flow field investigation in a rotating disk chemical vapor de-
   timedia feature. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,          position chamber with a perforated showerhead. Experimen-
   112, 983–990.                                                              tal Thermal and Fluid Science, 88, 389–399.
Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow subject to nonlinear heat flux and heat source/sink
286      Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow

Nazar, R., Amin, N., & Pop, I. (2004). Unsteady boundary layer         Turkyilmazoglu, M. (2018a). Convergence accelerating in the ho-
   flow due to a stretching surface in a rotating fluid. Mechanics         motopy analysis method: A new approach. Advances in Ap-
   Research Communications, 31, 121–128.                                   plied Mathematics and Mechanics, 10, 925–947.
Qayyum, S., Khan, M. I., Hayat, T., & Alsaedi, A. (2018). Compara-     Turkyilmazoglu, M. (2018b). Analytical solutions to mixed con-
   tive investigation of five nanoparticles in flow of viscous fluid       vection MHD fluid flow induced by a nonlinearly deforming
   with Joule heating and slip due to rotating disk. Physica B, 534,       permeable surface. Communications in Nonlinear Science and
   173–183.                                                                Numerical Simulation, 36, 373–379.
Sheikholeslami, M., Saleem, S., Shafee, A., Li, Z., Hayat, T., Al-     Waqas, M., Khan, M. I., Hayat, T., & Alsaedi, A. (2017). Stratified
   saedi, A., & Khan, M. I. (2019). Mesoscopic investigation for           flow of an Oldroyd-B nanoliquid with heat generation. Results
   alumina nanofluid heat transfer in permeable medium in-                 in Physics, 7, 2489–2496.
   fluenced by Lorentz forces. Computer Methods in Applied Me-         Waqas, M., Khan, M. I., Hayat, T., Alsaedi, A., & Khan, M. I. (2017).
   chanics and Engineering, 349, 839–858.                                  Nonlinear thermal radiation in flow induced by a slendering
Tamoor, M., Waqas, M., Khan, M. I., Alsaedi, A., & Hayat, T. (2017).       surface accounting thermophoresis and Brownian diffusion.
   Magnetohydrodynamic flow of Casson fluid over a stretching              European Physical Journal Plus , 132, 280.
   cylinder. Results in Physics, 7, 498–502.                           Xie, Q., Xiao, Z., & Ren, Z. (2018). A spectral radius scaling semi-

                                                                                                                                               Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcde/article/7/3/279/5818057 by guest on 11 November 2020
Turkyilmazoglu, M. (2012). Three dimensional MHD stagnation                implicit iterative time stepping method for reactive flow
   flow due to a stretchable rotating disk. International Journal of       simulations with detailed chemistry. Journal of Computational
   Heat and Mass Transfer, 55, 6959–6965.                                  Physics, 368, 47–68.
Turkyilmazoglu, M. (2016). Magnetic field and slip effects on the      Yao, B., & Lian, L. (2018). A new analysis of the rotationally sym-
   flow and heat transfer of stagnation point Jeffrey fluid over           metric flow in the presence of an infinite rotating disk. Inter-
   deformable surfaces. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, 71, 549–        national Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 136, 106–111.
   556.                                                                Yasmeen, T., Hayat, T., Khan, M. I., Imtiaz, M., & Alsaedi, A.
Turkyilmazoglu, M. (2017a). Parametrized adomian decompo-                  (2016). Ferrofluid flow by a stretched surface in the presence
   sition method with optimum convergence. Transactions on                 of magnetic dipole and homogeneous–heterogeneous reac-
   Modeling and Computer Simulation, 27, 21.                               tions. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 223, 1000–1005.
Turkyilmazoglu, M. (2017b). Unsteady MHD rear stagnation-              Zeeshan, A., Shehzad, N., & Ellahi, R. (2018). Analysis of acti-
   point flow over off-centered deformable surfaces. Interna-              vation energy in Couette–Poiseuille flow of nanofluid in the
   tional Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 27,          presence of chemical reaction and convective boundary con-
   1555–1570.                                                              ditions. Results in Physics, 8, 502–512.
Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow subject to nonlinear heat flux and heat source/sink Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in rotating flow subject to nonlinear heat flux and heat source/sink
You can also read