Auckland District Health Board Learning Needs Analysis for culturally competency training programmes for the primary and secondary health and ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Auckland District Health Board Learning Needs Analysis for culturally competency training programmes for the primary and secondary health and disability workforce April, 2009 Dr Annette Mortensen Project Manager Northern DHB Support Agency 1
Table of Contents 2 1. Executive Summary 3 2. Introduction 4 2.1. Defining Cultural Competence 6 2.1.1 The Medical Council of New Zealand 6 2.1.2 The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners 9 2.1.3 Auckland Region Allied/Public Health/Technical MECA 9 2.1.4 Nursing Council of New Zealand 10 2.1.5 The Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers 11 3. Context 13 4. Aims and Objectives 14 5. Population Demography 15 6. Current State and Gap Analysis 20 6.1. Stocktake of cultural competency programmes available to the ADHB health and disability workforce 20 6.1.1. Provided by ADHB service provider 21 6.1.2. Provided by regional provider 21 6.2 Linkages 22 6.3 Organisational Constraints 24 7 Literature Review 25 7.1 Organisational Cultural Competency 26 7.2 Cross-Cultural Training 31 7.2.1 Clinical Care and Medical Education 35 7.2.2 Primary Health 37 7.2.3 Mental Health 37 7.2.4 Measuring Individual Cultural Competence 38 7.3 The Role of Staff from Ethnic Backgrounds 38 8. Summary of Key Findings 39 8.1 Mental Health Services 40 8.2 Community Child Health and Disability Services and A+ Links 43 8.3 Nursing Development Unit 45 8.4 Womens Health and Childrens Emergency Department 46 8.5 ADHB Social Work Team 46 8.6 Primary Health services 47 8.6.1 General Practitioners 47 9. Conclusions 48 9.1 Organisational Leadership 48 9.2 Combination of Strategies at Different Levels 48 10. Appendices 10.1 Appendix 1: Statistics New Zealand Level2: Asian categories 50 10.2 Appendix 2: Cross-Cultural Training Model 51 10.3 Appendix 3: The Cornerstone General Practice Accreditation Process 52 10.4 Appendix 4: ADHB Community Mental Health Centres: Transcultural Service 53 10.5 Appendix 5: Cultural Competency Resources 56 10.6 Appendix 6: Study Participants 61 2
10.7 Appendix 7: Waitemata DHB and Refugees as Survivors NZ Trust (2007). Cross–Cultural Resource: For mental health practitioners working with culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) clients 62 10 References 63 11 List of Tables and Figures Table 1: Projected Ethnic Composition of Auckland City by 2016 16 Table 2: Ethnic Groups in Central Auckland 16 Table 3: Common Languages Spoken 16 Table 4: List of languages provided by the ADHB (ADHB, 2009) 17 Table 5: ADHB Job Statistics by Languages over 4 Financial Years 18 Table 6: Percentage of South Asian population in ADHB, usually resident, total response (SNZ, 2006) 19 Table 7: South Asian Population Distribution 19 1. Executive Summary Summary Why do we need cultural competence training for the ADHB primary and secondary health and disability workforce? The need to develop cultural competence is underpinned by legislative requirements. Section 118(i) of the Health Practitioners Competency Assurance Act (HPCAA) requires that health practitioners observe standards of cultural competence as set by their professional authority. Central Auckland has the most ethnically diverse population of any region in New Zealand. By 2016 Asian peoples with comprise 34 % of the Auckland District Health Board population Central Auckland ethnodemographic trends highlight the importance of providing culturally responsive primary and secondary health and disability services for the populations served. The indications are that the patterns of poor health that are occurring in low socio-economic groups in New Zealand, in particular Pacific groups, including diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular disease, poor mental health, and oral health, and high smoking rates are being replicated in some ethnic groups settled in Auckland (ARPHS, Harbour PHO & WDHB AHSS, 2007; Gala, 2008, Solomon, 1999; 1997; 1995; 1993). What training do ADHB primary and secondary health and disability services want? Refugee and migrant communities in local, regional and national consultation processes, health and disability research, health service evaluations, and health needs analyses give a strong indication that clients from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds are commonly not receiving culturally appropriate care in health and disability services. Cultural competency training is part of the programme of work for the Auckland Regional Settlement Strategy Refugee and Migrant Health Action Plan. The Auckland Regional Settlement Strategy Health Workstream Steering Group recommended the introduction or expansion of culturally competency training for the primary and secondary health and disability workforce in Auckland DHB. It is proposed that ADHB Learning and Development Units enhance and expand the culturally competence/diversity programmes that are currently available to the workforce to include cultural competencies for working with Asian and other new migrant groups and refugee groups. It is proposed that ADHB Learning and Development Units extend all cultural competency training programmes to the ADHB funded primary health workforce. Cultural competency programmes need to be part of the practitioner’s Performance Management and MECA (Career and salary Progression (CASP) process); and professional development programme 3
The delivery of cultural competence training needs to be modular including core competencies and training tailored to meet the needs of practitioners, clinical services and the populations served (see Appendix 2) How do ADHB primary and secondary health and disability service providers want cultural competency training to be provided? The ADHB primary and secondary health and disability workforce need flexible learning options including: workshops, seminars, simulated learning sessions; e-learning via MOODLE; self-evaluation tools; CD ROMs; case study discussions; video materials; and hard copy resources. Practitioners want a modular approach including core competencies and advanced training options ‘tailored’ for practice and clinical settings Sustainable and effective cross–cultural practice requires ongoing cross-cultural supervision, peer review, and case management processes for practitioners that are appropriate to the clinical setting and the populations being served. Cross- cultural competency training programmes should become a sustainable component of the ADHB Learning and Development Unit framework for cultural competency workforce development for the primary and secondary health and disability sectors. How will cultural competency training make a sustainable difference to practice? The transcultural and inter cultural mental health training programmes, and the transcultural service delivered by ADHB Community Mental Health Services provide a demonstration model for sustainable cultural competency development and practice in other ADHB health and disability services Through organisational and professional development processes that build cross-cultural competency into clinical practice, supervision and mentoring processes How will we know if cultural competency training has made a difference? Cultural competency training needs to be evaluated, and the outcomes for clients from culturally diverse backgrounds assessed The end goal is achieving good health outcomes for clients 2. Introduction Since the early 1990s, the ethnic demography of the Auckland region has changed significantly (Department of Labour, 2006; Department of Labour and Auckland Sustainable Cities Programme, 2007; Statistics New Zealand (SNZ), 2006). Auckland is the gateway to New Zealand for many migrants and refugees, and where the greatest proportion chooses to settle. The region has settled over 200 diverse ethnic groups (SNZ, 2006). Over half of the population in the region has come from other countries (SNZ, 2006). Of the 50,700 New Zealand adult non-English speakers, over 65 percent live in Auckland. Almost three-quarters of the people, who come to New Zealand from the Pacific Islands, and two-thirds of those who come to New Zealand from Asia, live in Auckland. Central Auckland has the most ethnically diverse population of any region in New Zealand (SNZ, 2006). The ethnic composition of the ADHB population is projected to change over time with growth expected in the proportion of Asian peoples in the population (ADHB, 2009). A number of regional and national health studies and consultation processes including the health needs assessments conducted by Auckland and other DHBs have highlighted the need for more culturally responsive 4
health and disability services, and for a culturally competent workforce to meet the needs of the increasing ethnic diversity in District Health Board health populations (Asian Public Health Project Team. 2003; Auckland District Health Board, 2001; 2002; 2006a;2006b) The Health Practitioners Competency Assurance Act (HPCA Act) includes a requirement for registration bodies to develop standards of cultural competence and to ensure that practitioners meet those standards. Increasingly, groups such as the New Zealand Medical Council (NZMA), Royal College of General Practitioners, Public Health Physicians, Nursing Council of New Zealand (NCNZ), and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) have an interest in developing the cultural competence frameworks for the culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) groups in New Zealand. The issues of relevance for the development of CALD cultural competencies in health and disability sectors include: - the recognition of culture as a determinant of health status; - the continuing poor health status of Māori, Pacific and ethnic minority groups; - health inequalities between the dominant cultural group and Māori or other minorities; - the inclusion of the Treaty of Waitangi and/or principles of the Treaty in legislative, regulatory and contractual requirements of health practice; and - recognition of the need for a culturally competent health and disability workforce to address both issues of equity and health disparities. The Auckland District Health Board (ADHB) (2008) District Annual Plan for 2008 to 2009 identifies healthier communities and environments; and equity in health status between populations as key results to be achieved. Reducing health inequalities is one specific outcome for the Auckland District Health Board with a particular focus on improvements for ethnic groups, and low socio-economic groups with poor health outcomes. To support this action the Ministry of Health Migrant Health Budget 2008, contracted through the Northern DHB Support Agency, has awarded the Auckland District Health Board funding to provide cross- cultural competency training to the ADHB funded primary and secondary health and disability workforce. The area of Cross- cultural competence focuses on the skills, behaviours and attitudes required to work with the culturally, linguistically and religiously diverse groups served in the ADHB region. Benefits of cultural competence in healthcare A healthcare organisation that is ‘culturally competent’ is able to provide culturally responsive services, and to benefit from the diversity in the workforce. The development of cultural competence has been identified as an effective access and equity strategy, as well as a quality improvement process that is linked to improved client outcomes (Betancourt et al 2003; Brach & Fraser 2002; DHFS & AIHW 1998). Specifically, the benefits of delivering culturally competent healthcare include: Improved access and equity for all groups in the population Improved consumer ‘health literacy’ and reduced delays in seeking healthcare and treatment Improved communication and understanding of meanings between clients and service providers, resulting in: - better compliance with recommended treatment 5
- clearer expectations - reduced medication errors and adverse events - improved attendance at ‘follow-up’ appointments - reduced preventable hospitalisation rates - improved client satisfaction - Improved client safety and quality assurance - Improved ‘public image’ of health and disability services - Better use of resources. - Better health outcomes for clients and for culturally diverse populations Conversely, it follows that there are substantial risks that are likely to incur costs if healthcare provision is culturally incompetent. 2.1 Defining Cultural Competence The concept of ‘cultural competence’ was developed in health care to better meet the needs of increasingly culturally diverse populations, and in response to the growing evidence of disparities in the health of ethnic minority groups (Betancourt et al., 2003; Brach & Fraser, 2002). In New Zealand, interpreting what is meant by cultural competence is complicated by the fact that the Health Practitioner’s Competence Assurance Act does not give a clear definition of the term. Professional registration bodies for the health and disability workforce in New Zealand have each defined cultural competence in different ways. Some examples of the definitions that are being used are shown in this section including those of the Medical Council of New Zealand (MCNZ), Nursing Council of New Zealand (NCNZ), and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW). 2.1.1 The Medical Council of New Zealand The Medical Council of New Zealand published the following Statement on Cultural Competence in August 2006. Purpose of this statement 1. This statement outlines the attitudes, knowledge and skills expected of doctors in their dealings with all patients 1. The Council has developed a complementary Statement on best practices when providing care to Mäori patients and their whänau which deals with the standard expected of doctors when dealing with Mäori patients. A resource booklet entitled Best health outcomes for Mäori: Practice implications has also been developed which addresses the disparity between mainstream and Mäori health outcomes, discusses cultural concepts and provides advice for doctors. These resources should be read in conjunction with this statement. The Council also aims to develop additional resources to help doctors when treating patients from other cultural groups Introduction 2. Medical doctors in New Zealand work with a population that is culturally diverse. This is reflected by the many ethnic groups within our population, and also in other groupings that patients may identify with, such as disability culture, gay culture or a particular religious group. The medical workforce itself includes many international medical graduates and a variety of ethnic groups. Cross cultural doctor-patient interactions are therefore common, and doctors need to be competent in dealing with patients whose cultures differ from their own 3. Patients’ cultures affect the ways they understand health and illness, how they access health care services, and how they respond to health care interventions. 6
The purpose of cultural competence is to improve the quality of health care services and outcomes for patients 4. Benefits of appreciating and understanding cultural issues in the doctor-patient relationship include: Developing a trusting relationship Gaining increased information from patients Improving communication with patients Helping negotiate differences Increasing compliance with treatment and ensuring better patient outcomes Increased patient satisfaction 5. Cultural appreciation or understanding also has the potential to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of health care delivery Statutory responsibilities 6. In addition to setting standards of clinical competence, the Medical Council has a responsibility under section 118(i) of the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 to ensure the cultural competence of doctors 7. The Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights (the Code) also imposes a statutory duty upon doctors. The Code states: Right 1 – Right to be treated with respect (1) Every consumer has the right to be treated with respect. (2) Every consumer has the right to have his or her privacy respected. (3) Every consumer has the right to be provided with services that take into account the needs, values and beliefs of different cultural, religious, social and ethnic groups, including the needs, values and beliefs of Mäori Right 2 – Right to freedom from discrimination, coercion, harassment and exploitation Every consumer has the right to be free from discrimination, coercion, harassment, and sexual, financial or other exploitation Right 3 – Right to dignity and independence Every consumer has the right to have services provided in a manner that respects the dignity and independence of the individual Definition of cultural competence 8. The Council has adopted the following definition of cultural competence: “Cultural competence requires an awareness of cultural diversity and the ability to function effectively, and respectfully, when working with and treating people of different cultural backgrounds. Cultural competence means a doctor has the attitudes, skills and knowledge needed to achieve this. A culturally competent doctor will acknowledge: That New Zealand has a culturally diverse population That a doctor’s culture and belief systems influence his or her interactions with patients and accepts this may impact on the doctor-patient relationship That a positive patient outcome is achieved when a doctor and patient have mutual respect and understanding.” 7
9. Cultural mores identified by the Council are not restricted to ethnicity, but also include (and are not limited to) those related to gender, spiritual beliefs, sexual orientation, lifestyle, beliefs, age, social status or perceived economic worth 10. The Council emphasises that doctors need to be able to recognise and respect differing cultural perspectives of patients, for the purpose of effective clinical functioning in order to improve health outcomes for patients Cultural competence standards 11. To work successfully with patients of different cultural backgrounds, a doctor needs to demonstrate the appropriate attitudes, awareness, knowledge and skills: 12. Attitudes A willingness to understand your own cultural values and the influence these have on your interactions with patients A commitment to the ongoing development of your own cultural awareness and practices and those of your colleagues and staff A preparedness not to impose your own values on patients A willingness to appropriately challenge the cultural bias of individual colleagues or systemic bias within health care services where this will have a negative impact on patients 13. Awareness and knowledge An awareness of the limitations of your knowledge and openness to ongoing learning and development in partnership with patients An awareness that general cultural information may not apply to specific patients and that individual patients should not be thought of as stereotypes An awareness that cultural factors influence health and illness, including disease prevalence and response to treatment A respect for your patients and an understanding of their cultural beliefs, values and practices An understanding that patients’ cultural beliefs, values and practices influence their perceptions of health, illness and disease; their health care practices; their interactions with medical professionals and the health care system; and treatment preferences An understanding that the concept of culture extends beyond ethnicity, and that patients may identify with several cultural groupings An awareness of the general beliefs, values, behaviours and health practices of particular cultural groups most often encountered by the practitioner, and knowledge of how this can be applied in the clinical situation 14. Skills The ability to establish a rapport with patients of other cultures. The ability to elicit a patient’s cultural issues which might impact on the doctor-patient relationship The ability to recognise when your actions might not be acceptable or might be offensive to patients The ability to use cultural information when making a diagnosis 8
The ability to work with the patient’s cultural beliefs, values and practices in developing a relevant management plan The ability to include the patient’s family in their health care when appropriate The ability to work cooperatively with others in a patient’s culture (both professionals and other community resource people) where this is desired by the patient and does not conflict with other clinical or ethical requirements The ability to communicate effectively cross culturally and: Recognise that the verbal and nonverbal communication styles of patients may differ from your own and adapt as required. Work effectively with interpreters when required Seek assistance when necessary to better understand the patient’s cultural needs 2.1.2 The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners (2007) in Cultural competence: Advice for GPs to create and maintain culturally competent general practices in New Zealand use the Medical Council of New Zealand’s (2006) broad definition of cultural competence which is: ‘an awareness of cultural diversity and the ability to function effectively, and respectfully, when working with and treating people of different cultural backgrounds. A culturally competent doctor will acknowledge: That New Zealand has a culturally diverse population. That a doctor’s culture and belief systems influence his or her interactions with patients and accepts this may impact on the doctor. patient relationship. That a positive patient outcome is achieved when a doctor and patient have mutual respect and Understanding.’ 2.1.3 Auckland Region Allied/Public Health/Technical MECA Cultural Responsiveness This practice domain advances the competencies for practitioners regarding cultural competence for pacific cultures or for people from other cultures that you interact with in your clinical/professional practice. Cultural responsiveness requires and awareness of cultural diversity and the ability to function effectively and respectfully when working with people from different cultural backgrounds. It also requires awareness of the practitioner’s own identity and values, as well as an understanding of how these relate to practice. Cultural mores are not restricted to ethnicity but also include (but are not limited to) those related to gender, spiritual beliefs, sexual orientation, abilities, lifestyle, beliefs, age, social status, or received economic worth. The development of objectives based on the themes identified below relies on maintaining key relationships to ensure oversight, direction, leadership and guidance from the appropriate people within local organisations and the community. Theme Example of Activities Demonstrates alignment of - Develops and maintains relationships with clinical/professional practice and groups representing and identified culture appropriateness with policies - Demonstrates a working relationship with related to other cultural population relevant community resources groups represented in your DHB - Demonstrates an understanding and analysis of current issues in specific client groups - Links DHB Strategic plan with clinical practice in key target areas 9
Develops and in-depth - Researches into an identified culture, its wider understanding of and identified environmental context, leadership structure and cultural group within your DHB its interplay with clinical practice - Researches DHB vision and values and that culture’s population groups principles of health, linking this to own role and responsibilities - Researches disparities in the DHB population and links this to own service Leads and supports an aspect of - Demonstrates leadership and role modelling in cultural responsiveness within own both clinical and professional practice and service area service delivery - Challenges culturally inappropriate practices and supports staff to make changes - Is actively involved in developing cultural policies within own service - Develops needs assessment of cultural requirements for staff - Cultural knowledge and appropriateness is applied to clinical and professional practice - Demonstrates and understanding of own issues regarding cultural intervention - Demonstrates a working relationship with relevant community groups - Develops understanding and analysis of current issues in specific client groups - Leads the DHB Strategic Plan with clinical practice in key target areas 2.1.4 Nursing Council of New Zealand Guidelines for Cultural Safety, the Treaty of Waitangi, and Maori Health in Nursing and Midwifery Education and Practice (NCNZ, 2002) The cultural safety concept in the 2002 guidelines ‘incorporate[s] a broad definition that ‘in addition to ethnicity’ includes, ‘groups that are as diverse as social, religious and gender groups’ (NZNC, 2002, p.4). The Nursing Council of New Zealand (2002, p.7) defines cultural safety as: The effective nursing or midwifery practice of a person or family from another culture, and is determined by that person or family. Culture includes, but is not restricted to, age or generation; gender; sexual orientation; occupation and socioeconomic status; ethnic origin or migrant experience; religious or spiritual belief; and disability. The nurse or midwife delivering the nursing or midwifery service will have undertaken a process of reflection on his or her own cultural identity and will recognise the impact that his or her personal culture 10
has on his or her professional practice. Unsafe cultural practice comprises any action which diminishes, demeans or disempowers the cultural identity and wellbeing of an individual. In 2007, Competencies for Registered Nurses were introduced including the requirement to practice “in a manner that the client determines as being culturally safe” (NCNZ, 2007, p. 9). Cultural Safety Competencies for Registered Nurses The Nursing Council of New Zealand, (2002) Guidelines for cultural safety, the Treaty of Waitangi, and Maori health in nursing and midwifery education and practice serve as the basis for the indicators of competence related to the practice of cultural safety for all ethnic groups in New Zealand. The 2007 Competencies for registered nurses provide the indicators that nurses are expected to demonstrate when practising “in a manner that the client determines as being culturally safe” (NZNC, 2007, p. 9). The competencies include the nurse’s ability to (NZNC, 2007, p. 9): apply the principles of cultural safety to nursing practice; recognise the impact of the culture of nursing on client care and endeavour to protect the client’s wellbeing within this culture; practise in a way that respects each client’s identity and right to hold personal beliefs, values and goals; assist the client to gain appropriate support and representation from those who understand the client’s culture, needs and preferences; consult with members of cultural and other groups as requested and approved by the client; reflect on his/her own practice and values that impact on nursing care in relation to the client’s ethnicity, culture and beliefs; avoid imposing prejudice on others and provide advocacy when prejudice is apparent 2.1.5 The Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) The cultural competencies required by registered social workers are described in the The Auckland Region Allied/Public Health/Technical MECA and; The ANZASW Standards of Practice The ANZASW Standards of Practice The ANZASW is the professional body which provides the structure for accountability of social workers to their profession. The ANZASW sets ten practice standards for the assessment of practitioner competency. The following standards of practice pertain to cultural competence: Standard 3 The social worker establishes an appropriate and purposeful working relationship with clients, taking into account individual differences and the cultural and social context of the client’s situation. This standard is met when the social worker; 11
Uses cultural and gender appropriate verbal and non-verbal communication Is able to work with a variety of individuals and groups and when the social worker demonstrates a knowledge of: The concepts of culture, class, race, ethnicity, spirituality, sex, age and disability and understands the impact of racism, poverty and sexism at a personal and institutional level Standard 7 The social worker has knowledge about social work methods, social policies, social services, resources and opportunities and acts to ensure access for clients. This standard is met when the social worker demonstrates a knowledge of: I. Social work practice with Pakeha, Maori and Pacific Islands peoples and other ethnic groups, including the following aspects: a. Communication processes b. Planned, purposeful social work processes c. Groups processes d. Change strategies e. Preventative strategies f. Social planning, social action g. Community work and community development h. Power and authority issues i. Privacy and confidentiality j. Empowerment strategies II. Social services, including the following aspects: a. The role of government b. The role of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) c. The role of volunteers d. Teamwork and multidisciplinary processes e. Organisation and management practice f. Research principles and practice III. Social policies including the following aspects: a. Policy issues for people who may be disadvantaged on the grounds of race, gender, economic status, disability, sexual orientation and age b. Contemporary social policy directions c. Strategies for influencing policy d. Strategies for the promotion of informed participation IV. Resources and opportunities including the following aspects: a. The identification of needs including gaps in existing services b. The expansion and promotion of a range of choices and opportunities c. The use of networks to support clients, colleagues and communities in meeting social needs d. The availability of funding sources and procedures for obtaining funds e. The significance of culturally appropriate resources and personnel Standard 7 The social worker supervisor has knowledge about social work and supervision methods, social policies, social services, resources and opportunities and acts to ensure access for clients. 12
This standard is met when the social worker supervisor demonstrates knowledge of: Social work and supervision practice with Tangata Whenua and Tauiwi, including Pacifika peoples and other ethnic groups, including the following aspects: a. Communication processes b. Planned, purposeful social work processes c. Groups processes d. Change strategies e. Preventative strategies f. Social planning, social action g. Community work and community development h. Power and authority issues i. Privacy and confidentiality j. Empowerment strategies 3. Context Refugees, Asian and other migrant groups under utilise health and disability services; show disparities in health status; and have inequitable access to services compared to other health populations (Auckland Regional Public Health Service (ARPHS), Harbour PHO & Waitemata District Health Board’s (WDHB) Asian Health Support Services (AHSS), 2007; Rasanathan, Ameratunga & Tse, 2006; Scragg & Maitra, 2005). Commonly, cultural barriers are cited as a reason for not using health and disability services (Department of Labour & Auckland Sustainable Cities Programme, 2007), and the low utilisation of primary health services, in particular, is noted in a number of studies (Gala, 2008; Ngai, Latimer & Cheung, 2001). Multiple New Zealand studies of refugee and migrant health nationally (Asian Public Health Project Team, 2003; Denholm & Birukila, 2001; Denholm & Jama, 1998; Ho, Au, Bedford & Cooper, 2003; Jackson, 2006; Ministry of Health, 2001); regionally (Aye, 2002; Ho, Guerin, Cooper & Guerin, 2003; Lawrence, 2007; Mortensen, 2008; North & Lovell, 2002); and locally (Lawrence & Kearns, 2005); and the health needs assessments conducted by Auckland District Health Board and the Northern District Health Board Support Agency (NDSA) (ADHB, 2001; 2006a; 2006b; NDSA, 2006) have identified health professionals’ lack of cultural knowledge and skills as a major barrier to accessible, safe and equitable health services for the ethnically diverse groups served. As well, New Zealand research with health care providers indicates that nurses and other health professionals are ill prepared to provide for the care of culturally diverse groups (Lawrence & Kearns, 2005; Mortensen, 2008; North & Lovell, 2002). The Asian Health Chart Book (Ministry of Health, 2006) reveals major differences in health outcomes for South Asian groups. South Asian groups have high rates of obesity, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Gala, 2008). In New Zealand, the prevalence of diabetes and coronary heart disease is highest among Indian men when compared with European, Maori and Pacific groups (Gala, 2008). The disparities between South Asian and other populations are increasing 13
as the mortality rates for CVD are falling faster in non-South Asian population health groups (Gala, 2008). There are major differences in health service use between recent migrants and established communities, similar for Chinese, Indian and ‘Other’ Asian ethnic groups, that is, for almost all health indicators, recent or first-generation migrants do better than long-standing migrants or the New Zealand born. This is believed to largely reflect a healthy migrant effect and over time as acculturation impacts, healthy migrants become less healthy (Gala, 2008). A number of studies of refugee and migrant health care in New Zealand indicate that the health workforce is under prepared to meet the needs of the diverse ethnic populations served (Denholm, 2004; Lawrence, 2007; North & Lovell, 2002; Mortensen, 2008). North and Lovell’s (2002) survey of the impact of immigrant patients on primary health care services in Auckland and Wellington showed that health practitioners believed that clients from ethnically diverse backgrounds expressed their concerns, symptoms, and pain differently from other patients. Health practitioners reported that understanding the presentation of symptoms is central to diagnosing, and providing adequate treatment. Two-thirds of the respondents in the survey were nurses, less than half had received any training related to the care of clients from refugee, Asian and other migrant backgrounds, and most expressed the need for cross-cultural education (North & Lovell, 2002). The skills of cross-cultural communication including the use of interpreters are essential to client safety (Gray, 2007; Wearn et al., 2007). Practitioners who can use interpreters effectively, and communicate cross-culturally are more likely to receive accurate information; to ensure that the client understands the result of tests and screening; and to provide the client with information and instructions on medications, treatments and follow up. Communicating effectively with the client depends on the practitioner’s ability to gain rapport. The ability to adapt to different verbal and nonverbal communication styles where the culture of the practitioner is different to that of client is an important skill to avoid misunderstanding and actions that may be unacceptable to the client and their family. The ability to use cultural assessment tools, and to use the information gained aids good client outcomes. Working with the client’s cultural beliefs, values, and practices and applying this knowledge in planning care is more likely to lead to client satisfaction with the services offered. 4. Aims and Objectives The purpose of the delivery of cultural competency programmes to the Auckland District Health Board primary and secondary health and disability workforce is the delivery of services that are responsive, accessible, and culturally appropriate for the culturally, linguistically and religiously diverse groups served in the region. The programmes will make a significant contribution to ensuring that ADHB health and disability services provide culturally competent care for their ethnically diverse populations. The aims of the learning needs analysis are to: 14
1. To provide a stocktake of the cultural competency training available to the ADHB health and disability workforce, and on the evaluation outcomes of programmes where available 2. To assess unmet cultural competency training needs for a broad sample of ADHB health and disability services (including by professional group, specialty area, and primary and community health sectors) with health workers from ethnically diverse backgrounds as key stakeholders. 3. To assess health and disability workforce preferences for cultural competency learning modalities, information retrieval systems, and booking systems 4. To review the literature on best practice for cultural competency training for the health and disability workforce 5. To identify the critical features of culturally competent organisations 6. To investigate measures both organisational and professional of the impact of the cultural competency training on client outcomes and workforce practices. The objectives for cultural competency training are that: The accessibility, acceptability and quality of ADHB primary and secondary health and disability services for clients from CALD backgrounds will be improved through the provision of culturally competent care Health outcomes for clients from CALD backgrounds will be improved through the provision of culturally competent care because: Health and disability workers will have a better knowledge of client’s cultures and how: they affect the ways that clients and their families understand health and illness how they access health care services and; how they respond to health care interventions 5. Population Demography Asian peoples are overall the second largest population groups in the ADHB region, representing 18.7 per cent of Central Auckland’s total (SNZ, 2006). Asian peoples are the fastest growing groups in the Auckland region, and in Auckland City will increase by 100,000 (from 77,000 in 2001 to 177,000 in 2016), in Manukau City by 52,000 (from 46,000 to 98,000), in North Shore City by 37,000 (from 26,000 to 63,000), and in Waitakere City by 27,000 (from 20,000 to 47,000) (SNZ, 2006). Additionally, the Auckland District Health Board (2002) records refugee populations of approximately 40,000 people. Approximately 1,500 refugees settle in New Zealand every year, 65 per cent of whom will reside in Auckland (New Zealand Immigration Service (NZIS), 2004). The refugee groups settled in the last decade include peoples from Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bosnia, Kosovo, Somalia, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Sudan, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Burma, Bhutan, Burundi, Rwanda, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Brazzaville, Sierra Leone, Zimbabwe, Palestine, Algeria and Columbia. There are significant disparities in the health of refugee groups and other New Zealand populations (Ministry of Health, 2001). Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Diversity in Central Auckland 15
In the Census 2006, almost one in five people in Central Auckland identified with an Asian ethnic group, the highest proportion of all regions in New Zealand. Asian populations are made up of diverse ethnic sub-groups. The seven largest Asian ethnic groups in Census 2006 are Chinese (147,570), Indian (104,583), Korean (30,792), Filipino (16,938), Japanese (11,910), Sri Lankan (8,310) and Cambodian (6,918). Other Asian ethnic groups include Thai, Filipino, Japanese, Sri Lankan, Laotian, Cambodian, Vietnamese, Burmese, Bhutanese, Nepalese, Tibetan and Indonesian groups (Asian Public Health Project Team, 2003). The number of people born in India who were living in New Zealand more than doubled between 2001 and 2006. The number of people born in the Republic of Korea and Fiji also increased significantly. Between 2001 and 2006, the numbers of people in New Zealand able to have a conversation about everyday things in Hindi almost doubled, from 22,749 to 44,589. The number of people able to speak Mandarin increased from 26,514 to 41,391, the number of people able to speak Korean increased from 15,873 to 26,967. Acknowledging religious diversity is an integral part of providing culturally competent care. The Census 2006 data records Muslim peoples in the Auckland region to number 40,000, along with increases in groups of Buddhist, Hindu and other faiths. Auckland District Health Board Ethnic Populations Present and Future Central Auckland has the most ethnically diverse population of any region in New Zealand. The ethnic composition of the ADHB population is projected to change over time with growth expected in the proportion of Asian peoples in the population, and a reduction in European peoples (ADHB, 2009) (see Table 1) Table 1: Projected Ethnic Composition of Auckland City by 2016 (ADHB, 2009) Ethnic Groups Percentage of Auckland City Populations European 51% Asian Peoples 34% Maori 8% Pacific Peoples 13% Auckland District Health Board’s population is made up of the following ethnic groups Table 2: Ethnic Groups in Central Auckland (ADHB, 2009) Ethnic Groups Percentage of Auckland City Populations European 65.7% Maori 8.4% Pacific Peoples 13.7% Asian Peoples 18.7% Other nations 1.6% 16
The languages most commonly spoken in Central Auckland are shown in Table 3 Table 3: Common Languages Spoken (ADHB, 2009) Languages spoken Number in Population English 320,295 Samoan 14,226 Yue 9,993 Maori 8,799 Northern Chinese 8,469 Tongan 8,217 French 8,178 Hindi 7,941 Table 4: List of languages provided by the ADHB (ADHB, 2009) Albanian Algerian Amharic Arabic (Ethiopian Dialect) Assyrian Azurbijan Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Malaysia Bengali (Indian Dialect) Bosnian Bulgarian Burmese Burundi Cambodian Cantonese Chaldean (Iraqi dialect) Chin (Burmese dialect) Chiuchow (Chinese Cook Island Croatian dialect) Czechoslovakian Dari (Afghani language) Dinka (Sudanese dialect) Dutch Eritrean Ethiopian Farsi (Iranian language) Fijian Hindi French Fujian (Chinese dialect) German Greek Gujerati (Indian dialect) Ha-Ka (Chinese dialect) Hindi Hokkien (Chinese dialect) Italian Japanese Karen (Burmese Kinyarwanda (Rwanda) dialect) Kiribas (Kiribati) Kirundi (Burundi Korean kurdish dialect) Lao Latin Latin American Macedonian Mandarin Marathi (Indian dialect) Moroccan Niuean Pampango (Philipino dialect) Philipino Polish Portuguese (Tagalog) 17
Punjabi Pushtu (Afghani Russian Samoan language Serbian Serbocroatian Shanghinese Singalese (Sri Lankan) Slovakian Somali Spanish Sudanese Swahili Swiss-German Tahitian Taiwanese Tamil (Sri Lankan) Thai Tigrinya (North Tokelauan Ethiopian dialect) Tongan Tunisian Turkish Ukrainian Urdu (Pakistani) Vietnamese Yugoslav Rohingya (Burmese dialect) Table 5 represents the numbers of requests for interpreters in non-English speaking groups resident in the Central Auckland region from 2003 to 2006. Table 5: ADHB Job Statistics by Languages over 4 Financial Years 18
ADHB ITS Job Statistics by Languages over 4 Financial years Job numbers 30,000 2003 2004 2005 2006 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 e e i an an n i n rin ai tu n ic an i ic si at al nd es es oa ia ia ar Th sh r ab m er di ng da re Fa ss op Hi m on m ah So bo uj Pu Ar Ko To an Ru na hi Sa G nt Am m Et M et Ca Ca Vi Languages Table 6 shows the percentage of South Asian groups residing in the ADHB region. To give an indication of the diversity within ethnic groups, South Asian groups in Central Auckland include peoples from the Indian subcontinent, that is: India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Maldives, South African and Fiji Indians. There is significant diversity in language, culture and religion within and between South Asian groups. The range of languages spoken include: Hindi, Gujarati, Urdu, Fiji Hindi, Bengali, Tamil, Telegu, Nepalese, Bhutanese, Oriya, Sindhi, Kashmiri, Sinhala, Konkani, Marathi, Pashto, Kannada and Farsi. Table 6: Percentage of South Asian population in ADHB, usually resident, total response (SNZ, 2006) 19
3% ADHB 0% 9% 2% Indian 2% Fiji Indian 4% Pakistani Bangladeshi Sri Lankan Nepalese Afghani 80% Table 7 shows the number of South Asian peoples and groups in Central Auckland by comparison with other DHBs in Auckland, and in New Zealand. Table 7 South Asian Population Distribution Ethnicity ADHB CMDHB WDHB Waikato Capital Canterbury Rest of All NZ and NZ Coast Indian 28,605 27,708 14,160 5,031 7,104 3,135 13,221 98,967 Fiji Indian 1,296 2028 855 285 324 171 657 5,616 Pakistani 861 336 324 78 84 126 243 2,049 Bangladeshi 675 129 186 66 66 72 294 1,488 Sri Lankan 3,252 939 870 333 1134 441 1341 8,313 Nepalese 156 60 123 30 24 84 177 654 Afghani 1,104 258 480 90 57 519 33 2,538 South 35,949 31,458 16,998 5,913 8,793 4,548 15,966 119,625 Asians Religious Diversity Increasing religious diversity was noted in the 2006 Census. The number of people indicating an affiliation with the Sikh religion increased from 5,196 to 9,507 (up 83.0 percent) between 2001 and 2006, while people affiliated with either Hinduism (up from 39,798 to 64,392) or Islam (up from 23,631 to 36,072) also increased by more than 50 percent (61.8 percent and 52.6 percent, respectively). Almost 8 in 10 people (78.8 percent) affiliated with the Hindu religion were born overseas, particularly in Southern Asia and the Pacific Islands. A similar proportion of people affiliating with Islam (77.0 percent) were born overseas, mainly in Southern Asia, but also in the Middle East. The majority of people born overseas affiliating with Buddhism (37,590 people) were born in Asia (34,422 people). Of the people born overseas affiliating with Hindu and Muslim religions, almost half (49.8 percent and 48.0 percent, respectively) had arrived in New Zealand less than five years ago. More than one- third (36.1 percent) of overseas-born Buddhists arrived in New Zealand less than five years ago. 20
6. Current State and Gap Analysis 6.1 Stocktake of Cultural Competency Training available to the ADHB Health and Disability Workforce 6.1.1 Provided by ADHB provider Mental Health - Migrants and Refugees - Transcultural Issues in Mental Health The cultural competence programmes provided for the Auckland District Health Board health workforce are focused on secondary mental health services and include the following: This day training programme is run twice a year for ADHB secondary mental health services. There are no pre-requisites and no eligibility criteria for attendance at this course Course Goals To provide participants with the knowledge and skills to work with culturally diverse communities from refugee and migrant backgrounds. Learning Objectives To differentiate between the groups, refugees, asylum seekers and migrants and to assess their needs accordingly To have the skills to recognise PTSD/Depression To have the skills to ask about torture experiences To recognise the stressors involved in re-settlement for refugees and migrants To be able to access resources related to the care of refugees and migrants and to refer to appropriate services To be able to appreciate the differences in cultural values while working with clients who come from another ethnic group To develop strategies and skills in working with Chinese families To be able to articulate the concept of “acculturation” and to apply this model while working with migrants and refugees To use professional health interpreters that are appropriate to the ethnic group, language and gender of the client Mental Health - Intercultural Workshop-Developing Cross-Cultural Rapport This day training programme is run twice a year for ADHB secondary mental health services. There are no pre-requisites and no eligibility criteria for attendance at this course Course Goals To improve mental health professionals’ knowledge of cultural competencies To enhance mental health professionals’ cross cultural clinical skills Learning Objectives To provide training for mental health clinicians that supports them in achieving 21
rapport with their multicultural clients To provide training that effectively communicates the key concepts and Important factual knowledge required for these competencies To provide training that assists participants to build their skills and confidence In applying these cultural competencies The programme is designed to: To assist practitioners to gain confidence and competency in internationally agreed core cultural competencies To reinforce learning through access to course materials, references and resources with the objective of deepening practitioner understandings of the social and personal values of clients To enable the practitioner to distinguish between description and interpretations of client behaviour To assist participants to connect observable client behaviour to underlying core values and core beliefs To assist participants to recognise that how we behave is motivated by values, beliefs, “cultural sense” and that these are often outside our conscious awareness To assist participants to apply what is learned by solving relevant “cases”/critical incidents 6.1.2 Provided by Regional Provider NDSA (2007) Cross-Cultural Resource for interpreters and health practitioners working together in mental health Part 1. Auckland: NDSA NDSA (2007). Cross-Cultural Resource for Interpreters and Health practitioners working together in mental health Part 2. Auckland: NDSA The CD Rom is a cross-cultural training support resource developed specifically for Interpreters and health practitioners working together in mental health but is applicable to general health settings. The CD Rom contains scenarios, questions and answers, with information including: An introduction to the need for specialised training for Interpreters working in mental health settings and for the need for mental health practitioners and interpreters to work effectively together The roles of the interpreter: Expected competencies; Code of Ethics for Interpreters Common errors made during interpreting sessions Mental health terminology Cross-cultural issues (interpreters and practitioners): how beliefs and practices about health affect presentations of illness Pre and post-briefing, structuring of the interpreting session. Factors that affect the working relationship between the interpreter, the practitioner and the client The meta-skills involved in mental health interventions Role plays and exercises including: demonstrations from trainers with questions for practitioners; questions for practitioners to research, reflective-learning opportunities for practitioners 22
An information resource section including: research; journal articles; support services; contacts for supervision and professional development opportunities University of Auckland: Centre for Asian Health Research and Evaluation Asian Mental Health http://www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/soph/centres/cahre/amh/index.html Free on-line training modules for mental health practitioners which use case scenarios. The modules are: 1. Self Reflection 2. Asian Philosophy 3. Clinical Issues CAHRE has also produced an interactive CD teaching package on "Asian mental health: Training and development for real skills". This provides entry level of training on Asian mental health to health and social services students nationwide (commissioned by Te Pou, The National Centre of Mental Health Research, Information and Workforce Development). Waitemata DHB & Refugees as Survivors NZ Trust (2007). Cross–Cultural Resource: For health practitioners working with culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) clients. Auckland: Waitemata DHB & Refugees as Survivors NZ Trust (see Appendix 7) Cross-Cultural Interest Group for Mental Health Workers Live seminar via web site from work or home computers on www.presentationcentral.co.nz. For information contact Valu Fineanganofo Ph [09] 638‐0414 or Email: ValuF@adhb.govt.nz In 2002, Dr Sai Wong set up the Cross-Cultural Interest Group to raise awareness and to enhance understanding and skills in cross-cultural clinical work, providing a free forum for sharing and discussion. The Cross-Cultural Interest Group meets monthly. Speakers present on their practices and experiences in the context of working with diverse cultural groups. Topics have included ethics in cross cultural practice, perceptions of mental illness from diverse Asian cultural perspectives, ethnic variations in the response to, and side effects of psychotropic medication, herbal-drug interactions and the use of Indian traditional medicine. From 2008 videoconferencing has allowed practitioners in other locations in New Zealand to participate in the meetings 6.2 Linkages There are linkages between the proposed cultural competency training programmes for CALD populations and the cultural competency training being offered to meet bicultural and Pacific Best practice competency requirements: There will be a links to: The development by ADHB Planning and Funding of a cultural competency policy for the ADHB health and disability workforce The ADHB Bicultural competency programmes which include: 1. Tikanga: Recommended best practice e-learning 23
2. Treaty of Waitangi in Practice (Te Korito) (8 sessions per year are provided) 3. Tikanga in Practice (6 sessions per year are provided) The Treaty of Waitangi in practice training is a mandatory requirement and must be completed within a year based on need and accreditation of prior learning. The training modality is face to face. The goal is to provide participants with the knowledge and skills necessary to understand the role of Te Tiriti o Waitangi in ADHB policy and practice. The learning objectives are that participants are able to: Explain and demonstrate a common understanding of the Treaty of Waitangi: it’s historical context and principles Identify the articles of the Treaty of Waitangi, and describe key principles; Recognise the effects on Maori communities and Maori health status from historical policies Identify Crown responsibilities for Maori health Describe ADHB Maori health responsibilities and key policy documents Describe ways in which they can implement health services consistent with the Treaty of Waitangi To complete the course participants must complete the Tikanga in Practice e- learning modules and the Tikanga in Practice module. When the participant has completed the three courses and the post course assessment for Tikanga in Practice, they are able to access a Te Korito certificate online. A Treaty–on-line e-learning tool is in development and will be available to all staff in 2009: An ADHB Pacific cultural competency programme is under development: The availability free of charge of ADHB e-learning and on-line library via MOODLE to ADHB funded PHOS and NGOs There are linkages to: The Primary Health Interpreting Pilots. The ‘working with interpreters’ training which is being provided by the ADHB Interpreting Service to ADHB funded primary health services is part of the Primary Health Interpreting Pilots1 Regional cross cultural mental health training programmes including: WDHB and Refugees as Survivors mental health practitioners cross- cultural training programme available on-line http://www.caldresources.org.nz/info/courses.php#moduletop WDHB and Refugees as Survivors general health practitioners cross- cultural training programme available on-line http://www.caldresources.org.nz/main/index.php NDSA (2007) Cross-Cultural Resource for interpreters and health practitioners working together in mental health Part 1. (see section 7.1) NDSA (2007). Cross-Cultural Resource for Interpreters and Health practitioners working together in mental health Part 2. (see section 7.1.2) 1 The ADHB Interpreting Service has been funded to provide interpreters to ADHB funded PHOs from August 2008. Training for the primary health workforce is being rolled out to the general practices participating in the three year pilot which is a project of the Auckland Regional Settlement Strategy Health Workstream. 24
You can also read