STRENGTHENING CANADA THROUGH OUR HOMETOWNS FCM BUDGET 2015 SUBMISSION - FCM.CA
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Strengthening
Canada through
our Hometowns
FCM Budget 2015
Submission
fcm.ca
Table of Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1
Strengthening Canada through our Hometowns ........................................................................... 1
Section 1 – Local Jobs and Growth. ....................................................................2
Canada’s Future: Where our water is protected............................................................................. 3
Identifying the gap..................................................................................................................... 4
Recommendations..................................................................................................................... 5
Canada’s Future: Where people and ideas move quickly . ............................................................. 6
Identifying the gap..................................................................................................................... 6
Recommendations..................................................................................................................... 7
Section 2 – Livable Communities .......................................................................... 8
Canada’s Future: A welcoming and affordable place to live and build a future............................. 8
Identifying the gap..................................................................................................................... 9
Recommendations................................................................................................................... 10
Introduction
Strengthening
Canada through
our Hometowns
“A strong Canada begins with strong hometowns. Hometowns propel our
country forward; they are engines of innovation, creativity and our sense
of community. Where we choose to work, live and raise our families is a
powerful source of pride for most Canadians.”
FCM President, Brad Woodside
E
ach of us has a story about how a To realize this vision, we believe that all
hometown teacher, librarian, firefighter, orders of government must work together
police officer, small business owner, and strengthen our economy from the
artist, volunteer, entrepreneur, neighbour or ground up, shaping our future through
friend has changed lives for the better. These our cities and communities.
stories are the building blocks for what makes
With a strong federal partner, we can build
Canada great.
the modern infrastructure we need to move
These stories also point toward a better forward. We can ensure our communities
Canada—one of dynamic cities and commu- remain affordable and family-friendly. We
nities with modern infrastructure that can can attract talent and investment and drive
compete with the best in the world; one with job creation.
affordable, healthy and livable communities,
By working together, we can strengthen
both rural and urban, for Canadian families.
our hometowns. That’s how we will build this
country and ensure a better quality of life for
all Canadians.
1Section 1
Local Jobs
and Growth
Canada’s Future –
Our cities and communities are engines of innovation and growth
O
ur country’s future relies on healthy Canada’s municipalities have consistently
job growth and sustainable economic demonstrated that we get shovels in the
development. And this starts with ground quickly on major infrastructure
strengthening Canada’s hometowns. renewal. We are ready to partner with you
on these solutions to keep our economy
Investing in local infrastructure provides a
and country moving forward.
clear and measurable return on investment,
and helps address some of the biggest
challenges hindering our economic compet-
itiveness. Predictable investments in core
municipal infrastructure are vital to keeping “Investing in infrastructure should
goods moving and businesses operating. be a top spending priority, to build
a foundation under the Canadian
Reducing crippling gridlock through improved economy and ensure that we
public transit will generate tens of billions of remain globally competitive as
dollars worth of productivity gains and improve an exporter and creator of wealth.”
our environment. Partnering on important
- Conference Board of Canada
wastewater-system upgrades will enable
communities to meet new federal standards
and help the environment.
2Canada’s Future: Without a partnership between all orders of
Where our water is protected government, these costs will force municipali-
Ensuring that our lakes and rivers are clean, ties to defer other local infrastructure priorities
and that Canadians have safe and reliable that are critical to sustained economic growth
drinking water, are obligations shared by and job creation, and could significantly increase
all orders of government. property taxes for hundreds of thousands of
families and small businesses. The Town of
Municipalities continuously and publicly
Burgeo, NL, for instance, faces a per-capita
supported the Government of Canada’s new
cost of $24,000 to $27,000. In Prince Rupert,
national standards for Canada’s more than
BC, the number is $10,000 to $12,000; for
3,500 wastewater systems. This regulation
the City of Montreal, complying with the
will benefit all Canadians and our environ-
new regulations will cost $1 billion.
ment. It will also require investments by all
orders of government, to make its successful Municipalities are ready to partner with the
implementation a reality. federal government on a new Clean Water
Fund to ensure that together we can meet
Over the next three decades, the regulations
these new regulations without straining the
require communities to substantially upgrade
economy, job creation and
about one-in-four wastewater-treatment
Canadian families.
systems across the country. Based on con-
servative estimates developed through both
Environment Canada and a survey of impacted
municipalities, capital expenditures alone will “Ensuring our communities have
be in excess of $18 billion. Municipalities will the resources they need to upgrade
also face significant additional costs in terms wastewater systems is absolutely
of up-front assessment and planning, as well essential to protecting our drinking
as in operating expenses. water and our environment.”
- Robert Haller, Executive
Director, Canadian Water
and Wastewater Association
3Identifying the Gap Preliminary total cost estimates –
Current levels of investment in all local infra- selected municipalities:
structure delivered through the permanent, • Metro Vancouver, BC: $1.5 billion
indexed federal Gas Tax Fund and the appli- • Halifax, NS: $710 million
cation-based New Building Canada Fund, are • Cape Breton, NS: $423 million
important complements to the $15 billion • Montreal, QC: $1.07 billion
invested by municipalities themselves each • Greater Moncton, NB: $105 million
year. As these programs are designed to cover • Regina, SK: $88 million
all local infrastructure needs, they simply
Preliminary per capita cost estimates –
cannot also address the new costs associated
selected municipalities:
with the implementation of the wastewater
• $24,000-27,000: Town of Burgeo, NL
regulations.
• $10,000-12,000: Prince Rupert, BC
To build a strong foundation for Canada’s • $7,145: Portage la Prairie, MB
future and maximize the value of infrastruc- • $3,064: Rocky Harbour, NL
ture investments by all orders of government, • $3,017: Corner Brook, NL
additional long-term, predictable and dedicated • $2,273: Port Clements, BC
funding is needed to address new infrastructure • $1,975: Powell River, BC
priorities created by the federal wastewater • $1,652: Neepawa, MB
regulations. • $1,279: Sackville, NB
• $1,136: St. John’s, NL
Approximately 850 wastewater systems
are affected by the new regulations (See
wastewater table upgrades, page 5). According
to FCM cost estimates, communities with #HOMETOWNPROUD
high-risk systems will need to invest approx-
imately $3.5 billion before the compliance Canadians from coast to
deadline of 2020. Medium-risk systems are coast to coast are proud
estimated to require investments of more than of their hometowns:
$10 billion by 2030, while low-risk systems “In the Town of Souris, you will
see our civic pride visible every
will require more than $4 billion dollars by day in many different ways. We
2040. This represents current and future believe in preserving our environ-
investments totaling at least $18 billion ment and we strive to make our
town beautiful for all to enjoy.”
dollars in capital expenditures alone.
- Joanne Dunphy, Souris, PEI
shared her pride in FCM’s
Hometown Proud Campaign
4Recommendations:
Partnering on
Solutions “All Newfoundlanders and
Support immediate job creation and
Labradorians want to keep our
contribute substantially to Canada’s GDP
water clean. The challenge for
by partnering with municipalities on a new,
many of our communities is that
Clean Water Fund.
if we have to bear these costs
• New federal investments of $300 million
alone, we would use up entire town
annually, to be matched by municipal
budgets. We all need to come to
governments and by provincial and the table, ready to do our part.”
territorial governments, for a total
program value of $900 million per - Mayor Churence Rogers,
year; and President of the Municipalities
of Newfoundland and Labrador
• Commit funding for at least 20 years to
assist communities with the capital cost of
rebuilding wastewater systems (estimated
total cost: more than $18 billion).
Wastewater Facilities Requiring Upgrades, By Region
Number of Facilities Requiring Upgrades Based on National
Ranking System
Jurisdiction Low Risk 2040 Medium Risk 2030 High Risk 2020 Total
Alberta 3 30 2 35
British Columbia 0 4 8 12
Manitoba 0 81 0 81
New Brunswick 13 38 0 51
Newfoundland
0 1 45 46
and Labrador
Nova Scotia 8 36 16 60
Ontario 99 4 3 106
Prince Edward Island 17 7 0 24
Quebec 0 144 30 174
Saskatchewan 0 29 1 30
Yukon 0 1 1 2
Federal 162 36 30 228
Total 302 411 136 849
Source: Environment Canada
5Canada’s Future: Our public-opinion research shows that
Where people and ideas move quickly traffic congestion, public transit and roads
When people can move around a city quickly, are consistently identified as primary issues
creative ideas also tend to move quickly. The affecting the quality of life for residents in
ability to travel quickly is a foundation for a municipalities across Canada; 64 percent of
vibrant, modern city, and a necessity for a Canadians say that improved public transit
strong national economy. will make life better in their communities.
It is no coincidence that some of the most Canada’s municipalities are committed to
dynamic places in the world—those that are reducing traffic and increasing available
true engines of their national economies— transit. But we cannot do it on our own.
also have some of the world’s best rapid- Fostering communities where people and
transit systems. ideas move quickly must be a priority all
orders of government tackle together.
What’s more, Canadians told us that they
base their decisions on where to establish Identifying the Gap
themselves on factors such as how easy it In a recent study, the Canadian Urban Transit
is to get from modern affordable neighbour- Association (CUTA) estimated transit capital
hoods to their workplaces quickly. They want needs of $53.5 billion between 2012 and 2016.
to work hard, and have time to relax with Approximately $40 billion of this amount will
family and friends. They want to avoid come from existing funding commitments by
traffic congestion and long commutes. all governments, including almost $4 billion
over five years from the federal government.
Today, the average Canadian commuter
This leaves a funding shortfall of $13.5 billion.
spends the equivalent of 32 working days a
CUTA estimates the federal share of eliminating
year travelling to and from work. The Greater
this $13.5 billion shortfall to be approximately
Toronto Area and Metro Montréal have
$1 billion a year.
average daily commute times of more than
75 minutes, longer than London, New York
and Los Angeles. Average daily commute
times in Calgary are 66 minutes; in Vancouver,
67 minutes. These and many other urban
regions need major investments to fight
growing gridlock.
6Recommendations: #HOMETOWNPROUD
Partnering on
solutions Canadians from coast to
Reduce traffic congestion, improve local coast to coast are proud
of their hometowns:
mobility and support sustainable growth
“Spruce Grove would be even
through committing to the development of a
better if we had a transit system
long-term, predictable and dedicated fund for that connected us to surrounding
municipal transit projects. towns and cities on a regular
basis.”
• New federal investments of at least
- Debbie Brown, Spruce Grove,
$1 billion annually dedicated to municipal Alberta shared her pride in
transit projects, to be matched by municipal FCM’s Hometown Proud
and by provincial and territorial govern- Campaign
ments, for a total program value of
$3 billion per year.
• Improve predictability and maximize value
for money, by putting this investment on a
long-term track with funding committed for
15–20 years, on five-year planning cycles.
• Allocate funding based on current and
projected transit ridership.
Return on Investment:
• According to the Canadian Urban Transit
“Canadians don’t want to spend
so much time in traffic; it’s costing
Association, every dollar invested in public
our economy billions of dollars.
transit generates three dollars worth of
Mayors from across the country
economic growth.
are united and ready to partner with
• The $2 billion invested in transit projects
the federal government on cutting
across Canada in 2007 generated 22,570
commute times.”
full-time equivalent jobs.
• The CD Howe Institute estimates that - Mayor John Tory, Toronto, Ontario
traffic congestion costs the Toronto region
up to $11 billion worth of lost productivity
each year.
7Section 2
Livable
Communities
Canada’s Future –
A welcoming and affordable place to live and build a future
T
ogether we can create vibrant, welcom- makes up 20 per cent of Canada’s GDP.
ing communities where people want to Housing that’s affordable improves lives
live and work, start businesses, build and strengthens communities.
connections and contribute.
Protecting federal investments in social
Housing that is affordable for newcomers, housing and creating incentives to increase
young families, the middle class and rental housing will help keep vulnerable
seniors alike lays the groundwork for seniors in their homes and out of the health
healthy communities. care system for longer periods of time, make
housing more affordable for the one-third of
For too many Canadians, affordable home-
Canadians who rent, and take the pressure off
ownership remains out of reach. Home prices
the housing market and household debt.
have more than doubled since 2000. Forty two
percent of young Canadians currently live with According to our internal public-opinion
their parents. Household mortgages make research, which sampled more than 5,300
up 68 percent of Canada’s record high house- Canadians across the country, 63 percent of
hold debt, one of the greatest threats to our Canadians believe new affordable housing will
economy, according to the Bank of Canada. make life better in their communities. Building
affordable housing was seen as an important
Investments in housing make sense. Including
area of concern for all cities and communities,
the costs of rent and construction, housing
large and small.
8Municipalities continue to invest significantly According to the Bank of Canada, household
in housing and have been implementing an debt, of which mortgages make up 68 percent,
array of initiatives to increase and preserve is one of the greatest risks to the economy.
the supply of rental and affordable housing.
One-third of Canadians rent, but investments
These include tax exemptions, intensification
in purpose-built rental housing have flatlined
and redevelopment initiatives, and stream-
at 10 percent of all housing starts for more
lining approvals, but the scope and range of
than a decade. Over the same period, conver-
problems are too complex for any one order
sions to condominiums and a poor state
of government to solve alone. It will require
of repair have contributed to a net loss of
collaboration and leadership from the federal
affordable rental housing in Canada. According
government to secure the future of housing
to the Conference Board of Canada “housing
in Canada.
unaffordability is a structural feature of the
Canada’s municipalities are ready to work Canadian economy affecting people at
together to create healthier, more livable a wide range of income levels.”
hometowns.
Increased investments in purpose-built rental
Identifying the Gap housing will ease the pressure off both the
The Government of Canada currently invests home-ownership and social-housing systems,
$1.7 billion annually in federal operating and provide additional affordable-housing
agreements for Canada’s 600,000 social- options, helping lower the record levels of
housing units. As these agreements wind household debt that threatens Canada’s
down, annual federal spending will decline economy.
from $1.7 billion in 2014/2015 to $1 billion in
2020, $530 million in 2025, under $1 million
in 2035 and to $0 by 2040.
“…improved ownership afford-
At the same time, the need for affordable ability will translate into reduced
housing is growing. Over 200,000 Canadians pressure for higher rents and a
experience homelessness every year. The City reduction in the need for housing
of Calgary and the Region of Waterloo, for assistance.”
instance, each have social-housing waitlists of
- Canadian Home Builder’s
more than 3,000 households. In Metro Vancouver,
Association, Housing Affordability
the number is 4,100. Across the country, the
And Accessibility, A Synopsis of
number surpasses 150,000. Canada had Solutions, 2012
approximately 1,086 homeless shelters in
2011, up from 859 in 2006.
9Recommendations: Preserve and increase affordable rental
housing through tax incentives aimed at
Partnering on removing barriers to new affordable and
Solutions market-rental housing.
Protect and make permanent Canada`s • Invest $400 million in innovative tax
$2.072 billion annual federal affordable- incentives to preserve existing rental
housing programs and investments. units and remove barriers to new afford-
• Preserve rent and operational subsidies able and market-rental housing to begin
where needed and, where current oper- to meet the needs of the almost 200,000
ation agreements are no longer needed, Canadian families on waiting lists for
invest funds as agreements expire in new affordable housing.
social-capital repair and regeneration - Eco-Energy Retrofit: To improve the
programs. quality of rental stock, reduce high
• Reinvest approximately 30 percent of utility-cost burdens for renters, reduce
expiring funds in a new Capital Repair and emissions and environmental impacts,
Regeneration Program to begin to address and increase resale and future rental
Canada’s social-housing capital-repair value to landlords (insulation and
deficit. windows, update heating systems and
• Current allotments of $253 million possibly replace older appliances).
annually to the federal Investment in Potential cost: $150 million annually
Affordable Housing (IAH) program and
the $119 million annually for Homelessness
Partnering Strategy (HPS) should be
renewed and made permanent when #HOMETOWNPROUD
they expire in 2019.
• Delivery of all programs must ensure Canadians from coast to
sufficient flexibility to meet the unique coast to coast are proud
of their hometowns:
agreements, needs and circumstances of
each region. It must also recognize that “A national housing strategy
and more federal funding for
climate and geography are natural disin- affordable housing would make
centives for investment in rental and other my hometown even better.”
affordable-housing options in Canada’s - Kelly McRae, Winnipeg,
Manitoba shared her pride
North. New investments, rental incentives
in FCM’s Hometown
and the reinvestment of expiring operating Proud Campaign
agreements should be targeted to address
these barriers.
10- Rental Incentive Tax Credit: To stop Return on Investment:
the serious erosion—through demolition • For every dollar invested in housing,
and conversion to condominiums— Canada earns back $1.40 in GDP.
of existing lower-rent properties, this • The annual cost to Canadians of
incentive would credit property owners homelessness is estimated at $7 billion.
for selling affordable assets to eligible • The housing sector represents 20 percent
non-profit providers (including a of Canada’s GDP. A stable, secure housing
municipality), thereby preserving system that creates and maintains jobs
assets and promoting long-term while allowing for a range of living options
affordability. The credit would target is essential to grow our economy.
small investors that face large tax-
liabilities when they sell properties.
Potential cost: $250 million annually
“The price of buying a family home in Saskatchewan is up over 40% in the last
decade, with vacancy rates below 2% in much of the province, including my
community of Yorkton. We have to do better if we want our communities to
grow and thrive, to attract young families, and to keep things affordable for
our seniors.”
- Councillor and
FCM Board member
Randy Goulden,
Yorkton, Saskatchewan
11The Federation of Canadian Municipalities is the
national voice of municipal government representing
90 percent
Alber
of Canada’s municipal population.
• Bir ta A ssocia
Our CCmembers
amroh Hills C n of Mrepresent
ity of
c
s e
tio
un
• Cit ounty • icipal Dis
cities and communities
from• Cicoast
ty
L educ to
•
y o f Colcoast
d
B razea
u to
tric
rhea of St. A City of Lake • C County Counties
ts acoast.
nd
l L •
No. 2d No. 11 bert • Cit ethbridg ity of Edm Camros • Alberta B
of St • Coun7 • C ount y of e • on eC eac
e t t l t y o y of F Wetaski City of Ll ton • City ounty • C h • Alber
Weta e r No f New o rty M w in • o ydm of Fo ity of ta Ur
b
• Lac skiwin N . 6 • Cou ell • Cou ile No. 8Clear Hil inster • C rt Saskat Airdrie •an Municip
o o n n l s i c
Acad mbe Co 10 • Cy ty of Tw ty of No • Count County ty of Me hewan • City of alities As
.
B
87 M ia No. 34 unty • La press Co o Hills N rthern Ligy of Gran • Clearw dicine Ha City of G rooks • sociation •
o
• Mu unicipal D• Munici mont Co unty • Fl . 21 • C hts • Co de Prairi ater • Co t • City o rande Pr City of C Beaver
p a o
No. 1 nicipal D istrict of al Distri unty • Le gstaff Co unty of Vunty of Pae No. 1 • unty Cou f Red De airie • Ci algary • Coun
3 5 i s t r F a c t o d u c Cou unty • ermilio inteart County nty of A er • Cit ty of La City
River • Mun ict of L irview f Big
L n K n h o th yo co
No. 6 No. 130 icipal Dis esser Sl No. 136 akes • M ty • Mac neehill C River No No. 18 • f Lethbri abasca • f Spruce mbe
1 • • M unici t r i c t of P a v e River • M unici u n i cipal k e n zie C o u n ty • L . 2 4 C o u nty o d g e C o unty Grove
Sunr Mun p o • Co f • Co o
p i D u
Sadd ise Coun icipal Dis al Distri ncher Cr No. 124 al Distric istrict o unty • M ac La Bic unty of W St. Paul nty of M f Bar-
l e H t y • t r i c t c t o f e e k No. 9 • M u t o f f B i g o u n t h e C a r n N o . i
19 • nburn
Betu ills C Park of W Spir nicip Foot horn ain V ount er N
o C
mer la Beach ounty • S land Cou illow Cre it River N • Munici al Distric hills No. No. 8 • M iew Coun y • Lac S . 5 • Co ounty
3 u
Itask Village of • Summe moky Laknty • Red ek No. 2 o. 133 • pal Distri t of Oppo 1 • Mun unicipal ty • Mun te. Anne nty of
6
• Towa Beach Grandvie r Village e County Deer Co • MunicMunicipa ct of Ran rtunity N icipal Dis District o icipal Dis County
•
Town n of Troc Summe w • Sum of Birchc • Starla unty • R ipality of l District chland N o. 17 • M trict of G f Bonnyv trict of
n o i
of Wh of Verm hu • Tow r Village mer Villa liff • Sum d Count egional M Crowsne of Taber . 66 • Muunicipal Dreenview lle No.
i te cour i l i o n•T n o f Tur o f J g e m er Vil y • Strat u nicip s t Pass • M n i cipal i strict N o. 16
• Vill t ow ne arvis B of Ha la h al •
unici
p D of
Cere age of B • Townsi n of Viki r Valley • ay • Tow lf Moon B ge of Bur cona Cou ity of Wo Municip al Distric istrict of Peace
i t o
Cons al • Villag ttern Lak e of Redwng • Tow Town of n of Sylva ay • Sum nstick La nty • Stu d Buffal ality of J t of Wain Smoky
n
City o ort • Villa e of Chame • Villag ood Mea of Vulca Two Hills n Lake • mer Vill ke • Sumrgeon Co o • Rock asper No wright
a y
• Cit f Halifax ge of Co pion • V e of Bot dows • V n • Town • Town o Town of T ge of Ho mer Villaunty • Su View Co rthern
y o • C u t t s•V i l l a h a i l l a o f f Valley a b rs esho g e m
of Gh mer V unty •
City o f Ottaw ity of ill ge of • Vill
a
ge of Wain
w vie
er • T
o e o il
C A
men f Windso a • QuebHamilton age of Co hauvin • ge of Bre cme • V right • T w • Town wn of ThrBay • Su st Lake •lage of
ts • r • e c • C w le V i l t o n i l l a o w n o f e e m m er Vi Sum-
• Cit Sask City o City • ity of y•C
it
lage
o • Vill ge of A of We Vaux
h
Hills
• l
• Cit y of Burn atchewan f Winnip City of R Kitchene y of Bramf Chipma age of C lix • Villa mbley • all • Tow Town of lage of
y e e r a T
Victo o f Yorkt a b y • Cit U r ban
M
g • Regi g i n a•C • C ity of p t o n•C n ( A B) •
V
r m anga
y
g e of Al
l
ow n of W n o f Vegr Tofield
of Do ria • Lac on • City y of Bram unicipal onal Mun ity of Sas Laval • City of Calg illage of • Villag iance • V estlock eville •
i
Villag nnelly • Ste. Ann of Red D pton • C ities Ass icipality katoon • ity of Lon ary • Cit Clive • Vi e of Caro llage of B• Town
e o f Gad V i l l age o e C ount e e r -Reg i t y of Hu o c i a t o f D urha C i t y d o n y o f E l l a g e l ine erw
• Vill
s f y m ion - m • of St. Joh • City of dmonton of Clyde • Village yn
Long age of Hi by • Villa Duchess Village o ional Mun boldt • Town of C ount n’s • M issis • Cit • Villa of
v n g • fC i R R
f Mo iew • Vill es Creek e of Gala Village remona cipality o egion of ichmond y of King City of S auga • C y of Gatin ge of
r a h o f s u i e
llage rin • Villa ge of Lou • Village ad • Villa f Edberg • Village York • T Peel • Ci Hill • Cit • Rural rrey • Ci ty of Mon au •
o f Ry g e of g h eed o f H g e of • V ill o f Del o w n sh t y o fP y o fV M u nic t y o fT tréal
lage u
of Th croft • Vi Myrnam • Villag ghenden Glendon age of Ed burne • ip of Lan rince Ge ictoria • ipality of oronto •
orsb l e • g V o T
y • V lage of R • Village of Mann Village • Village erton • illage of gley • Mu rge • Co own of C St. Cle-
illage yley • of Na ville • of Inn of Gl Villag Delia nicip unty ornw
• We of Vi m V isf e nw eo • ali of al
stloc Wabamu llage of S pa • Vill illage of Mree • Vill ood • Vil f Ferinto Village o ty of the Lambtonl
k Co n • p r i n age o a r w a g e l a g e s h • f Don C o u n
unty V g a o
• Wh illage of Lake • V f Noblefo yne • Vil f Kitscot of Hay La Village of alda • Vil ty of
eatla Warb illage rd • lage y•V k e s • F o r e lage
nd C u V o il s
ount rg • Villa of Stand illage of f Milo • V lage of L Village of tburg •
y•W a R i in
oodlage of War rd • Villa ockyford llage of M den • Vi Heisler
nds C ner • ge of • Vill inbur llage
ount V S a n o
y • Ye illage of tirling • ge of Ro • Villagef
llowh Willin Villag sema
ead C gd eo ry
ount on • Vul f Strome •
y can C •
12 ount
y24, Clarence Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 5P3
www.fcm.caYou can also read
