ISBA Paralegal Symposium April 2021 www.proteusdiscovery.com

Page created by Elizabeth Reeves
 
CONTINUE READING
ISBA Paralegal Symposium April 2021 www.proteusdiscovery.com
ISBA Paralegal Symposium
 April 2021
 www.proteusdiscovery.com
ISBA Paralegal Symposium April 2021 www.proteusdiscovery.com
Agenda

• Speaker introduction
• eDiscovery Fundamentals
• Processes and workflows
• Two document review platforms: Relativity and Everlaw
• When contracted document review makes sense
ISBA Paralegal Symposium April 2021 www.proteusdiscovery.com
Speaker introductions

 Ray Biederman, JD Anthony Cozzi, JD
 CEO, Co-Founder Sr. Project Manager
 CEDS (Certified eDiscovery Specialist)
ISBA Paralegal Symposium April 2021 www.proteusdiscovery.com
What is eDiscovery?

• At its core, eDiscovery is the process taken to determine what data is:
 • Relevant and must be produced to opposing counsel / investigating body
 • Privileged and does not need to be produced

 A non-exhaustive sample of common data sources
 EDRM: Electronic Discovery Resource Model includes cloud, server, and paper-based data
ISBA Paralegal Symposium April 2021 www.proteusdiscovery.com
Why do I care?
ISBA Paralegal Symposium April 2021 www.proteusdiscovery.com
ABA, FRCP, and Other Guidance

• ABA:
 • Rule 1.1, Competence: A lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent
 representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for
 the representation
 • Comment 8: …a lawyer should keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits
 and risks associated with relevant technology…[emphasis added]

• California formal opinion: an attorney lacking the required competence for the eDiscovery issues in the case
 at issue has three options
 • Acquire sufficient learning and skill before performance is required
 • Associate with or consult technical consultants or competent counsel
 • Decline the representation

• FRCP: extensive guidance regarding cost, proportionality, and process including Rules 1, 4, 16, 26, 34, and 37
ISBA Paralegal Symposium April 2021 www.proteusdiscovery.com
Document Review Platforms

• There is no shortage of options
• Cloud based or on-prem
• From highly-complex to fairly-intuitive
• Pricing per user, per matter, per amount of data ingested, and more
ISBA Paralegal Symposium April 2021 www.proteusdiscovery.com
Relativity

• 800 lb. gorilla.
• Very powerful, but very complex (12 certifications available).
• Transitioning from server-based to cloud-based (RelativityOne).
• Relativity is most adaptable to integrations and add-ons.
• Pricing typically occurs per GB/month.
• There is an access fee for each user.
• Relativity is typically sold through a channel partner.
• Strong certification program.
• No ability to process and load data on your own without add-on.
ISBA Paralegal Symposium April 2021 www.proteusdiscovery.com
Relativity Demo
ISBA Paralegal Symposium April 2021 www.proteusdiscovery.com
Everlaw

• Everlaw is sold on a Per GB/Month basis.
• No per user Fee.
• No fees for additional features.
• No external connections to third-party applications.
• Intuitive interface.
• Able to process and load data on your own.
• No project managers to call for support.
Everlaw Demo
Contracted Document Review

• When to use
 • Large volume of documents
 • Intricate issue codes
 • Leverage machine learning

• When not to use
 • Small document set
 • Complex privilege calls
 • If there is no one to manage the process

• What questions to ask/how to vet a partner
 • Location of attorneys
 • Progress measurables
 • Communication
 • End products (decision log, chat functionality)
 • Flat fee or per document pricing
 • QC abilities and workflows
DiscoveryMaster – Doc Review Management
DiscoveryMaster – Doc Review Management
New Factors in Document Review

 • Creation of new technology, maturity of millennials and emergence of Gen Z
 • Emerging document review issues:
 • Emojis
 • Online collaboration tools
 • Internet of Things (IoT)
 • Deepfakes
New Factors in Document Review: Emojis

• Roughly 8.5 billion texts are sent per day in the U.S., equating to an average of 32 texts per person
 per day.
• Approximately 70% of Americans who text use emojis – an estimated 10% use ONLY emojis.
• More than 700 million emojis are used every day on Facebook posts.
• Discovery Issues:
 • Forensic tools don’t always capture emojis
 • Different platforms (Apple, Android, etc.) can display the exact same emoji in different ways.

 https://cloudnine.com/ediscoverydaily/electronic-discovery/thinking-like-a-millennial-how-millennials-are-changing-discovery-part-four/
New Factors in Document Review: Emojis

• Eric Goldman is attempting to track every U.S. court opinion in Westlaw and Lexis that references
 emojis.
• His 2018 Year-in-Review blog post indicated that there were 53 such cases in 2018, which accounts
 to over 30% of the 171 such cases he has identified since 2004.
• No major substantive rulings on emojis to date, but it’s likely only a matter of time.

 ⚖️ ⏱️

 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/01/emoji-law-2018-year-in-review.htm/
New Factors in Document Review: Collaboration Tools

• Definition: web-based apps offering teams the ability to work remotely on the same platform by
 utilizing services such as instant messaging, to-do lists, file sharing, scheduling, etc.
• Examples
 • Slack
 • Basecamp
 • Microsoft Teams
 • Google Docs

 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/01/emoji-law-2018-year-in-review.htm/
New Factors in Document Review: Collaboration Tools

• Advantages
 • Can be utilized to streamline workflows and improve productivity.
 • Can lead to dramatic reduction in email communication.
 • Can successfully track the progression of work for the duration of one or more projects.

 https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/technology/pages/collaboration-apps-make-e-discovery-more-difficult.aspx
New Factors in Document Review: Collaboration Tools

• Disadvantages
 • Can be misused to harass co-collaborators.
 • Many online collaboration tools contain both public and private chat channels, which can make
 identification and collection of relevant information difficult.
 • Chat messages and other features are sometimes encrypted and can often be created and
 deleted in discreet ways.
 • Not designed for corporate data management or compliance.

 https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/technology/pages/collaboration-apps-make-e-discovery-more-difficult.aspx
New Factors in Document Review: Collaboration Tools

• Discovery Issues:
 • What counts as a “document” for the purpose of discovery?
 • Who should be listed as the custodian?
 • How should legal holds be applied and successfully enforced?
 • How can information exported from the application be reviewed and utilized?

 https://www.logikcull.com/blog/case-study-slack-data-wins-the-case
New Factors in Document Review: IoT

• Internet of Things (IoT): “The concept of connecting any device with an on and off switch to the
 Internet (and/or to each other).”
• Examples
 • “Smart Speakers” (Amazon Echo, Google Home, etc.)
 • “Wearables” (Fitbit, Apple Watch, Garmin)
 • Cell phones
 • Coffee Makers
 • Washing Machines
 • Headphones
 • Lamps

 Forbes, A Simple Explanation of the Internet of Things, May 13, 2014
New Factors in Document Review: IoT

• Usage
 • Research firm Gartner forecasted that 8.4 billion connected “things” were being used worldwide
 in 2017.
 • Up 31% from 2016
 • Projected 20.4 billion connected “things” in 2020
 • Consumer Applications Accounted for 63% of IOT in 2017

 Gartner Press Release, February 7, 2017
 https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2017-02-07-gartner-says-8-billion-connected-things-will-be-in-use-in-2017-up-31-percent-from-2016
New Factors in Document Review: IoT

• Discovery Issues
 • How to access and preserve data?
 • Potential for falsifying or hacking of the IoT device
 • Each IoT device may generate its own proprietary data format
 • How can information exported from the IoT device be reviewed and utilized?

 https://www.zapproved.com/blog/using-iot-data-challenges/
New Factors in Document Review
IoT Example
New Factors in Document Review: Deepfakes

• Deepfakes: utilize artificial intelligence to take an existing image, video, or audio file and replace
 them with fake or misleading content that is difficult, if not impossible, to detect.

 https://www.logikcull.com/blog/two-ways-to-start-deepfaking-evidence-today-not-that-you-would
New Factors in Document Review: Deepfakes

Example
New Factors in Document Review: Deepfakes

• Discovery Issues:
 • How can we keep deepfakes out of productions (and the courtroom)?
 • While research is currently being conducted to find ways to effectively detect deepfakes, it’s
 possible that the deepfake technology may be improved at a rate that outpaces the technology
 designed to detect it.

 https://www.logikcull.com/blog/two-ways-to-start-deepfaking-evidence-today-not-that-you-would
Resources

• EDRM (Electronic Discovery Resource Model)
• ACEDS (Association of Certified e-Discovery Specialists)
• The Sedona Conference (standards organization with standing groups on eDiscovery)
• eDiscovery Today (daily blog published by Doug Austin)
Get in touch

 Ray Biederman Anthony Cozzi
 CEO, Co-Founder Sr. Project Manager
 ray.biederman@proteusdiscovery.com anthony.cozzi@proteusdiscovery.com
You can also read