Discovery 2020 Yuta Michimura - Department of Physics, University of Tokyo - 東京大学

Page created by Theodore Pena
 
CONTINUE READING
Discovery 2020 Yuta Michimura - Department of Physics, University of Tokyo - 東京大学
Ando Lab Midterm Seminar                                      April 21, 2020

  Discovery 2020
                           Yuta Michimura
                 Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Discovery 2020 Yuta Michimura - Department of Physics, University of Tokyo - 東京大学
Contents
•   Looking back on the year 2019
•   Working from home
•   My plans and expectations for the year 2020
•   Hot topics (continued and expanded from 2019)
    - Ultralight dark matter search with interferometers
    - Optical levitation of photonic crystal mirror
    - Lorentz invariance test in space
    - SILVIA:
      Space
      Interferometer
       Laboratory
       Voyaging towards
        Innovative
         Applications                                    2
                                  (c)Philip FONG / AFP
Discovery 2020 Yuta Michimura - Department of Physics, University of Tokyo - 東京大学
Review: My Plans JFY2019
                     Only upto ~0.97 Mpc
 Mostly not done

Done for some tables

 KAGRA+
 paper not done

Work in progress
(Paper with Somiya-san
published)
           SILVIA
Cavity constructed

New collaboration
                                           3
started (PnC, LMA)
Discovery 2020 Yuta Michimura - Department of Physics, University of Tokyo - 東京大学
Review: My Expectations JFY2019
                      Successful implementation
                      Paper by Enomoto-kun
      Not achieved
   Partially done
DONE at below
100 Hz
Achieved good
sensitivity but not
started
         DONE
       Cryostat
       constructed
PASSED

 From this year?
                                                  4
Discovery 2020 Yuta Michimura - Department of Physics, University of Tokyo - 東京大学
Effort Report for 2019

                         5
Discovery 2020 Yuta Michimura - Department of Physics, University of Tokyo - 東京大学
Effort Report for 2019
    • Compared with 2018:
       - KAGRA slightly decreased, KAGRA+ halved
       - Quantum and dark matter doubled
       - DECIGO greatly increased
    • Many visits (thank you for supports!)
                                                        For 2018

                                                                       45.0%
                                                                       19.9%
                                                                       4.6%
                                                                       0.0%
                                                                       4.7%
                                                                       2.3%

                                                                       15.6%
                                                                       8.0%
                                                                       without Virgo

* Number of days spent was counted for each topic based on my personal record.
If n topics on the same day, 1/n was allocated for each topic.                 6
Discovery 2020 Yuta Michimura - Department of Physics, University of Tokyo - 東京大学
Effort Report for 2020 (so far)

                                  7
Discovery 2020 Yuta Michimura - Department of Physics, University of Tokyo - 東京大学
Working from Home
  •    At first could not concentrate on work
  •    Now I’m used to it. No commuting is convenient.
  •    But I started to feel like I’m left behind
  •    Lucky that most of the work can be done remotely with my
       brain and PC (which is not ideal for experimentalists, though)

                Sleep                                 Sleep
Eat

                                    Eat
      Work                         News
                          Eat                Work             Eat
                                                           Shop
                        Commute                                   8
         Chat                                      Eat
Discovery 2020 Yuta Michimura - Department of Physics, University of Tokyo - 東京大学
Email Traffic over the Month
    • I was expecting a decrease, but slightly increased?
         (may be just a coincidence)

https://emailanalytics.com/

                                                          7都府県
                              Started to work from home   緊急事態宣言

                                                                   Test emails
                                                                   to check
                                                                   granite

                                                                            9
Discovery 2020 Yuta Michimura - Department of Physics, University of Tokyo - 東京大学
Summary and News from JFY2019
 • Significant achievements by group members
 • New projects such as SILVIA, DANCE and optical levitation
   mirror started as anticipated
 • Progress in KAGRA much less than anticipated (found
   tragedic issues: birefringence and frosting)
 • Visited (too?) many places, gave a number of talks,
   including lectures at TianQin Research Center and Durham
   University, and met new people
 • Wrote many applications (4 positions, 3 grants, involved in
   other 6 applications including a big one on dark matter)
 • Wrote EPJD review paper on mg-scale optomechanics,
   Parity article on KAGRA
 • New people related to dark matter
 • Time to realize ideas rather than coming up with new ideas?
                                                           10
Productivity for the Past 10 Years
• 2019 was the most productive year by numbers
• But this is just from past activities of group members

                              As of April 2020

                               PhD Thesis

                               B4->M1

                                                           11
Number of People in Ando Group
• First big decrease in our group
• 2020 will be the touchstone of our ability to keep up

                                                          12
Grants for JFY2020
• Largest over the past years
• Largest output is expected
                                 Lorentz violation
                                  - observation!
                                 Optical levitation
                                  - mirrors!
                                 Quantum
                                  - mirrors!
                                 Axion
                                  - demonstration!

                                ※間接経費含む
                                      13
Balance between Topics
• Work-work balance would be
  very important in coming years
• Large scale vs Table top
• Ongoing vs Emerging
• Management vs Implementation
  ……

                                   14
My Plans JFY2020
• Remaining things for O4
   - OMC, beam shutter
   - Optical table cover for TRX and TRY
   - upgraded MZM? In-vac RF PDs and RF/DC QPDs?
• Finish KAGRA+ paper, write birefringence paper
• More concrete planning of SILVIA and DECIGO
• Write SILVIA and DECIGO paper
• Absorption calculations for
  optical levitation mirror
• Start DANCE Act-1 observation
• Introduce polarization optics
  to TRX and TRY of KAGRA
• Search for ultralight dark matter
  with KAGRA data                                15
My Expectations JFY2020
• New data analysis on GW polarization
• Better control of filter cavity and more clear squeezing angle
  rotation
• Pave the way to optical levitation mirror (photonic crystal or
  curvature from coating stress)
• Stability confirmation paper for optical levitation
• Start Lorentz violation search with upgraded setup
• Q measurement at cryogenic temperatures
• Coil-coil actuator paper

• New people in our group

                                                          16
Schedules in JFY2020
• June: 16th Patras Workshop @ Trieste, Italy
   → postponed to June 2021
• July: 13th LISA Symposium @ Glasgow, UK ??
• September: 日本物理学会 @ 筑波大学, 熊本大学 ??
• September: 日本天文学会 @ 弘前大学 ??
• September: LVKC @ Cardiff, UK ??
• October: JGRG30 @ 早稲田大学 ??
• March: 日本物理学会 @ 東京大学駒場キャンパス ??

                                                17
Hot Topics
• 2019 ver (see slides)
   - DANCE: Dark matter Axion riNg Cavity Experiment
   - Optical levitation of photonic crystal mirror
   - Lorentz invariance test in space
   - C-DECIGO: km scale GW detector in space
• 2020 ver
   - Ultralight dark matter search with interferometers
   - Optical levitation of photonic crystal mirror
   - Lorentz invariance test in space
   - SILVIA: Space Interferometer Laboratory Voyaging
  towards Innovative Applications

                                                          18
Laser Interferometry
• Great tool to probe fundamental mysteries of our Universe
• Laser interferometric gravitational wave detectors can be
  sensitive to various physics other than gravitational waves
• Small scale experiments can beat large scale experiments
                                                                             Dark
                                                           Alternative
                                                           polarization
                                                             modes
                                                                            energy
                                                Gravitational          Cosmic expansion,
                     Length change                 waves                   inflation
                         δL/L                           Boson cloud

Laser
                                                        around BHs   Dark
                                                               B-L bosons

                    Speed of light                      Non-standard matter
                                            Mirror    forces
                     change δc/c
  Fringe change                          displacement
                                                                          wave function
   ∝δL/L, δc/c anisotropy     polarization
                                            Axion     extra
                                                                            collapse
                              dependence                  dimensions
                            Lorentz violation                Quantization
                                      quantization of
                                        spacetime             of gravity 19
Dark Matter
• We know they exist everywhere and
  we know they played an important role
  in forming our Universe,
  but we don’t know what they are at all

                                           21
Past Searches: WIMPs
• Wide range of candidates, but many focused on WIMPs
• WIMP searches will be soon limited by neutrino background

 Park (2007)

                             https://cerncourier.com/a/defeating-the-background-
                             in-the-search-for-dark-matter/

                              PBHs
                              (upto 100 Msun = 1e59 GeV)                22
A New Era

  G. Bertone, T. M. P. Tait, Nature 562, 51 (2018)

                                            23
Laser Interferometric Search
• Strong tool to search for ultralight dark matter (wave-like
  dark matter)
• Dark matter Axion search with riNg Cavity Experiment
  (DANCE)
   I. Obata, T. Fujita, YM, PRL 121, 161301 (2018)
• DM Axion search with laser interferometric GWD
   K. Nagano, T. Fujita, YM, I. Obata, PRL 123, 111301 (2019)
• B-L gauge boson search
   P. W. Graham+, PRD 93, 075029 (2016)
   A. Pierce+, PRL 121, 061102 (2018)
   D. Carney+, arXiv:1908.04797
• Search through fine-structure constant change
   H. Grote & Y. V. Stadnik, PRR 1, 033187 (2019)
• New searches with strong magnets
   R. Creswick, F. T. Avignone III, arXiv:2004.01642
                                                                24
DANCE
• Axion-photon coupling (          ) gives different
  phase velocity between left-handed and right-
  handed circular polarizations

                                           axion mass
        coupling constant    axion field
• Measure the difference
  as resonant frequency
  difference in an bow-tie
  cavity

                                                   25
DANCE Act-1
• L= 1 m, Finesse = 3e3, Pin= 1 W
• Also good for practicing a cavity experiments

                                          ∝ma1/2     ∝ma5/4
                                           scan
                                   ∝ma5/4

        T >T                cavity pole
    ∝ma0 coh obs
                   ∝ma1/4                   ∝ma1/2
                                             scan

                                                              ∝ma1

                                                                     26
DANCE Act-2
                        • L= 1 m, Finesse= 2e5, Pin= 1 W, Tobs= 3 months
                        • New idea to do coherent search with two cavities

                        • Table-top experiment is complementary to large-scale
                          experiments like GW detectors
Axion-photon coupling

                                 CAST

                             γ-ray from SN1987A
                             X-ray from M87

                             DANCE Act-2 Advanced LIGO
                             (two cavities) (4 km)
                                                KAGRA (3 km)

                                                                                 27
DM Axion Search with GWDs
  • Different method is required for linear cavities in GW
    detectors                                         Modulation at
  • Axion-photon coupling create                      frequency
    modulation in polarization              p-pol
    angle of linear polarization
  • Sensitive when modulation period and round-trip time of
    light in a cavity are the same
  • Can be searched
    along with GWs                 left-handed
                 p-pol               is faster
 Laser       FI
                                  right-handed
      p-pol s-pol                    is faster
(GW signal) (Axion signal)                                    28
B-L Gauge Boson
    • Difference between baryon number and lepton number
    • B-L is conserved very well and could be a charge of U(1)B-L
      symmetry
       → It is natural to think that some gauge boson is coupled

                                    Baryon                Lepton
    • Related to baryon asymmetry
      through leptogenesis
浜口幸一 (2017)

                                                            29
Gauge Boson Search
• Several groups proposed laser interferometric search with
  GW detectors and mg-scale optomechanical experiments
   P. W. Graham+, PRD 93, 075029 (2016)
   A. Pierce+, PRL 121, 061102 (2018)
   D. Carney+, arXiv:1908.04797
• When mirrors have different
  B-L ratio (~neutron ratio), different
  resonant frequency, or mirrors are
  apart, amplitude or phase of force
  acting on mirrors are different
  and DM signal remains

                                                        30
Search with KAGRA and mg Mirror
 • KAGRA can outperform aLIGO because of the use of
   sapphire mirrors
 • Table top experiment can also be used
                            KAGRA           Advanced
                            DARM            LIGO
                                             When DM direction
                                             is optimal
                                             1 year observation
                                             with designed
      EP tests                               sensitivity for
                        7-mg pendulum
                                             KAGRA and aLIGO
                        with fixed mirror
                                             Sensitivity in PRL
                                             122, 071101 (2019)
        KAGRA PRC                            is used for 7-mg
                                             pendulum

                                                          31
bKAGRA to dKAGRA
• Dark matter search could
  bring light to KAGRA        Add polarization
                              optics to TRX
                              and TRY to
                              search for axion
                              with lower
                              sensitivity

     B-L gauge boson search
     with POP beam

     Sensitive axion search   JGW-P2011614
     with OFI rejected beam
                                         32
Fine-Structure Constant
• Scalar DM may introduce temporal variation in α
• Variation in α can be searched by looking for
  mirror thickness change
• BS thickness by MICH or ITM HR surface
  position change by DARM               H. Grote & Y. V. Stadnik,
                                        PRR 1, 033187 (2019)

                                                           33
Light Shining through Wall (LSW)
• Axion-photon conversion under magnetic field
  (Primakoff effect)

               production γ→a             reconversion a→γ
• LSW probability                                cavity length
                         magnetic field

        power build up

• Sensitivity proportional to
                                                          34
Proposal to Improve the Sensitivity
     •   See change in the transmitted power
     •   Modulate input laser polarization to modulate the signal
     •   Sensitivity will be proportional to
     •   But it is not a null measurement (room for improvement?)
                                                    ALPS-IIc
                                                    B=5 T, L=100 m,
                                                    Finesse=1.2e5, Pin= 30 W

                 FPAS-100
                 B=10 T, L=100 m,
                 Finesse=1e5, Pin=7.5 W
                                                                               35
R. Creswick, F. T. Avignone III, arXiv:2004.01642
Optical
Levitation
Long History
• Nov 2013: Sandwich proposed at a seminar
• Jan 2014: Ordered a prototype fused silica mirror
   3 mm dia. t 0.1 mm, RoC= 30 mm, R>99.95 %
• Apr 2014: Delivered (6 out of 7 are broken)
• Oct 2014-Jan 2020: Torsion pendulum experiment
     - Feb 2015: B4 report by Aritomi and Enomoto
     - Jan 2016: Master thesis by Kuwahara
     - Jan 2018: Master thesis by Wada
     - Jan 2019: Master thesis by Kawasaki
     - Jan 2020: Master thesis by Kita
•   Apr 2019: Proposal to use photonic crystal (seminar)
•   Oct 2019: Horizontal restoring force confirmation (elog)
•   Dec 2019: PCM collaboration initiated (seminar)
•   Apr 2020: Ordered thin fused silica substrates
•   Let’s fabricate and characterize of mirrors!            37
Levitation Mirrors We Want
  • First goal is to demonstrate the levitation
  • For demonstration, heavier mirror with higher
    finesse is OK
               For SQL              Prototype            For suspended
                                                         experiment
Mass           0.2 mg               ~1.6 mg              ~ 7 mg
Size (mm)      φ 0.7 mm             φ 3 mm               φ 3 mm
               t 0.23 mm            t 0.1 mm             t 0.5 mm
RoC            30 mm convex 30±10 mm convex              100 mm concave
                            (measured:                   (previously flat
                            15.9±0.5 mm)                 ones were used)
Reflectivity   97 %                 >99.95 %             99.99%
               (finesse 100)        (measured: >99.5%)

Comment        Optics Express 25,   Only one out of 8    Succeeded
               13799 (2017)
                                    without big cracks                38
Mirror Mass vs Reflectivity
• Mirror transmission give mirror mass (and mirror radius)
• Mirror transmission also gives maximum beam radius
  allowed from diffraction loss         If critical couple, no detuning

                            97%, 0.2 mg
                            (for SQL)

                                                              9.8 m/s2           Mirror power
                                                                                 transmission
                                                                                 (R=1-T)
 Beam radius has
 to be smaller than
                                                             Intra-cavity power
 dotted lines
 (2*Taperture < Tcoat/10)                                  Calculation by T. Kawasaki,
               99.95%, 1.6 mg                              modified by YM
               (for levitation demonstration)              (Mirror thickness 0.1 mm,
               Beam radius should be smaller than 0.6 mm   fused silica assumed to calculate radius.
                                                           Critical coupling)
                                                                                          39
Mirrors to Characterize in 2020
• Raw Si3N4 membrane (Norcada NX5100DS)
   - we have one
• Membrane with photonic crystal
   - we need to fabricate
• 3 mm dia. mirror we made in 2014
   - we have one
• 3 mm dia. thin fused silica substrate
   - in stock, ordered
• 1 inch dia. thin fused silica mirror
   - available by summer?
• 3 mm dia. thin fused silica mirror
   - available by the end of summer?

                                          40
Characterization Method
• By beam profiling of reflected beam and by cavity scan
  (Nagano method; see JPS2017s talk)
• Inside the small chamber to avoid contamination of mirrors
• See Chiyoda-kun’s talk

                                                        41
Absorption
   • Steady state temperature can be roughly calculated with

Absorption                                             Environment temperature
                                  Surface area
       Emissivity(~0.99) Stefan-Boltzmann constant   Mirror temperature

   • Absorption of > thickness
                                             since m, Pcirc and A will be
                                             proportional to radius2     42
More on Absorption
• Since beam density is high, two-photon absorption might
  also have to be considered
• The effect of temperature increase to
   - Radius of curvature change
   - Thermal lensing, wave front distortion
   - Cavity length change
   etc…
  should be considered with simulations
  (fused silica melting point is ~2000 K)
• Absorption measurements also necessary
• Study on photothermal effects recently reported by ANU
   R. Lecamwasam+, arXiv:1912.07789
   (if mirror heating increases cavity length, single optical
  spring can stabilize the cavity length)
                                                            43
Nanosphere is Hot
Even though absorption is
low, high temperatures (2,000 K) can be
reached because of poor
heat transfer to the surrounding gas at low
pressures.                                    J. Millen+, Nature
                                              Nanotechnology 9, 425 (2014)

                                                               44
Lorentz
Violation
Even Longer History
• Mar 2011: Monolithic MI experiment at Kyoto (seminar)
• Jul 2011: Proposal for ring cavity at seminar
• Jul 2012 to Oct 2013: Observation run
• Jun 2013: CPT’13 conference (seminar)
• Oct 2014: Submission of PhD thesis
• Jan 2018: Master thesis by Sakai and Takeda
   - Continuous rotation
     and monolithic optics
• Oct 2019: Almost the same
  noise floor at stationary
  and rotation achieved
  by Takeda-kun

                                                          46
Apparatus Comparison
      AC
     power
      data
     logger                      vacuum enclosure
                                       semi-
PC                                    monolithic
                                       optics
              laser                data
      vacuum enclosure            logger     laser
          non-             wireless   turntable       AC
        monolithic
         optics                          rotary      power
                            PC
                                       connector
         turntable
Old Model                    New Model
 - non-monolithic optics      - monolithic optics
                                                       47
 - alternative rotation       - continuous rotation
Latest Sensitivity
• Floor noise at rotation stays almost the same with that at
  stationary
• Noise peak at rotation frequency
                                             Polarization?
                                             Intensity?

                 When rotating               Could be solved
                    (old)                    with fiber fusion
                                             splicing

      Stationary
         (old)                            When rotating
               Stationary                    (new)
                 (new)

                                                          48
Prospects in 2020
• Good results are obtained and we need to take the last step
  toward the observation (may be its better to just start now?)
• Also can be used for practicing cavity control and noise
  hunting
• Setup very close to the setup which can be brought into
  space (see seminar slides)

                                               http://qsfp.physics.ox.ac.uk/

                                                                  49
SILVIA
• 100 m triangular formation flight demonstration satellite
• Applied for JAXA’s Epsilon class mission (公募型小型)
• Some people previously called FF-DECIGO
• Demonstration for space GW detector

                                                          51
Sensitivity
• 100 m, 100 g, finesse 100, 10 mW, 1e-13 N/rtHz

                     TOBA
                                      TianQin
                                                SILVIA
         LISA

                    B-DECIGO
                                     KAGRA
                    Einstein Telescope       aLIGO
                        Cosmic Explorer

                                                     52
Control
Scheme

             GW signal

          length
           servo

  Laser

      frequency          drag-free
         servo             servo
                                     53
Interesting Topics for SILVIA
• Initial link acquisition scheme and lock acquisition scheme
• Demonstration of control scheme with table top experiment
• Simulation of orbital motion with drag-free and cavity
  controls taken into account
• Development of actuators and local sensors

• Basic ideas are discussed (in Nagano-kun’s thesis or here
  and here), but actual demonstration
  in table-top experiments and
  time-domain simulations
  are very important
• No need to care so much about
  noise, focus on scheme
• Launch planned in ~2027                               54
Job Advertisement
• Ultralight dark matter search
  - DANCE Act-1 cavity experiment                   * Red ones can be
    (cavity characterization, noise spectrum…)        done from home
   - Observing run and data analysis pipeline
    (similar to continuous wave search;
     we are taking KAGRA PRCL and MICH data now!)
• Lorentz violation search
  - Hunt for noise peaking at rotation frequency
    (alignment, scattered light, fiber splicing…)
  - Observing run and data analysis pipeline (similar to DM search)
• Optical levitation
  - Mirror characterization
  - Absorption calculation
• SILVIA
  - Simulation on controls
  - Demonstration experiment                                 55
Summary
• 2020 seems to be an important year for future discovery
• Only you can
  motivate yourself

                                                        56
You can also read